HYBRID SYSTEM FOR CONTAMINANTS CONTROL OF INDUSTRIAL PROCESS

Abstract

This Invention Patent application provides a comprehensive program for control of organic and inorganic contaminants from paper production processes and other potentially pollutant industries through the integrated action of three continuous treatment systems, referenced herein as “3WAY”, with a first system aimed at the treatment of process waters for reuse, more specifically “white or clarified water” present in the “wet end” of paper and cellulose machines, allied to a second system based on the use of an adsorbent clay mix equipment that enables treatment of the cellulose pulp in previous phases of the process up to the machine circuit, in addition to a third system that carries out the cleaning of contaminant deposits present in clothing (felts and wires) or other machine parts through application of a heated and pressurized cleaning solution with a high detergency power.

Claims

1. “HYBRID SYSTEM FOR CONTAMINANTS CONTROL OF INDUSTRIAL PROCESS” wherein it integrates continuous contaminant treatment systems, supporting the chemical and mechanical method (100), which acts in synergy both in the “effect” (101) and in the “causes” (102) and (103) for generation of organic and inorganic deposits in paper and cellulose manufacturing and other industrial sectors.

2. “HYBRID SYSTEM FOR CONTAMINANTS CONTROL OF INDUSTRIAL PROCESS”, according to claim 1, wherein said “hybrid system” comprises three continuous treatment systems in the category (SWAY), namely a machine parts and clothing treatment system (101A), a process water treatment system (102A) and a cellulose pulp treatment system (103A).

3. “HYBRID SYSTEM FOR CONTAMINANTS CONTROL OF INDUSTRIAL PROCESS”, according to claim 1, wherein said hybrid system may allow two continuous treatment systems integrated to the category (2WAY), one of them being, necessarily, the machine parts and clothing treatment system (101A) with organic or inorganic deposits issues.

4. “HYBRID SYSTEM FOR CONTAMINANTS CONTROL OF INDUSTRIAL PROCESS”, according to claim 1, wherein the integration between the systems comprises a method for mapping and monitoring of the organic and inorganic contaminants in different phases of the process, in order to provide quick predictive analyses for decision making on how to balance the dosages of chemical additives and operation conditions between the different continuous treatment systems in categories (SWAY) and (2WAY).

5. “HYBRID SYSTEM FOR CONTAMINANTS CONTROL OF INDUSTRIAL PROCESS”, according to claim 4, wherein the initial mapping process is carried out through “direct measurements” of relevant parameters and correlated with “indirect measurements” which may be monitored with greater agility within the operational routine.

6. “HYBRID SYSTEM FOR CONTAMINANTS CONTROL OF INDUSTRIAL PROCESS”, according to claim 4, wherein it comprises the initial mapping of an industrial process for production of cellulose (200) in which the “direct measurement” for microscopic contaminant count may be correlated with the “indirect measurement” of the turbidity difference, before and after a pH shock, and a direct measurement of water hardness is correlated with a conductivity indirect measurement

7. “HYBRID SYSTEM FOR CONTAMINANTS CONTROL OF INDUSTRIAL PROCESS”, according to claim 4, wherein the monitoring enables identification of sudden changes to the level of contaminants right at the start of the process, thus allowing the increase of chemical additive dosages in the cellulose pulp treatment system (103A) and it may also act, when required, on the chemical strategy of process water treatment systems (102A) and machine parts and clothing treatment systems (101A).

8. “HYBRID SYSTEM FOR CONTAMINANTS CONTROL OF INDUSTRIAL PROCESS”, according to claim 1, wherein the process water treatment system (102A) uses one or more technologies that include filtering, oxidation and/or distillation.

9. “HYBRID SYSTEM FOR CONTAMINANTS CONTROL OF INDUSTRIAL PROCESS”, according to claim 8, wherein the technologies are applied to “complex residual currents” for reuse, which are generated in volumes lower than 100 m.sup.3/h.

10. “HYBRID SYSTEM FOR CONTAMINANTS CONTROL OF INDUSTRIAL PROCESS”, according to claim 9, wherein the “complex residual currents” for reuse are generated in volumes between 5 and 20 m.sup.3/h.

11. “HYBRID SYSTEM FOR CONTAMINANTS CONTROL OF INDUSTRIAL PROCESS”, according to claim 8, wherein the “complex residual currents” are segregated according to physicochemical and biological control parameters that allow evaluation of the recalcitrant nature of dissolved organic contaminants or the particle size of suspended contaminants.

12. “HYBRID SYSTEM FOR CONTAMINANTS CONTROL OF INDUSTRIAL PROCESS”, according to claim 11, wherein the control parameters indicate the recalcitrant nature of the “residual current” if the ratio between Chemical Oxygen Demand and the Biochemical Oxygen Demand (DQO/DBO) is higher than five and, for suspended pollutants, micrometric ones are separated from the macrometric ones when the particle size is below 5 μm.

13. “HYBRID SYSTEM FOR CONTAMINANTS CONTROL OF INDUSTRIAL PROCESS””, according to claim 8, wherein it comprises the recommendation of advanced oxidation treatment (102J) and/or advanced distillation treatment (102G) for “complex residual currents” with a DQO/DBO ratio higher than five, as well as the advanced membrane filtering techniques or ultrafiltration (102C) followed by reverse osmosis (102D) for situations with micrometric suspended pollutants with particle size lower than 5 μm, and also for dissolved inorganic pollutants, in addition to dissolved macromolecular organic pollutants with molecular weight above 10 KDaltons.

14. “HYBRID SYSTEM FOR CONTAMINANTS CONTROL OF INDUSTRIAL PROCESS”, according to claim 13, wherein it comprises the treatment of a “complex residual current” comprising, initially, ultrafiltration (102C) followed by reverse osmosis (102D) with the “accepted portion” sent for reuse, whereas the “rejected portion” (102F) must pass through the advanced distillation unit (102G); later on, its “accepted portion” (102H) may be used for more refined reuse applications, which may include DESMI water for boilers, and its “rejected portion” (1021) may also undergo the advanced oxidation process in a multioxidative reactor (102J); the final treated water (102K) may then return to the start of the process water treatment system (102A), as well as being released to the process water recirculation circuit or finally sent to the wastewater treatment plant.

15. “HYBRID SYSTEM FOR CONTAMINANTS CONTROL OF INDUSTRIAL PROCESS”, according to claim 8, wherein it comprises the applicability of said process water treatment system (102A) to numerous potentially pollutant industrial segments, in which the particularities of “complex residual currents” is compatible to this “hybrid system”, and may be included in said industrial segments the chemicals, textile, tannery, food, animal protein industry, pharmaceutical, pharmachemical, sugar cane, steelworks, metalworks, mining, oil and gas, and remediation industries, among others.

16. “HYBRID SYSTEM FOR CONTAMINANTS CONTROL OF INDUSTRIAL PROCESS”, according to claim 1, wherein the cellulose pulp treatment system (103A) provides a “thermodynamic equipment” such as the shearing chamber (103D) capable of applying a mix of clays (103B), (103C) and (103F) in the form of slurries, enhancing its contaminant adsorption properties.

17. “HYBRID SYSTEM FOR CONTAMINANTS CONTROL OF INDUSTRIAL PROCESS”, according to claim 16, wherein the “thermodynamic equipment” enables the synergistic action of clays (103B), (103C) and (103F) with the fixative polymer (103E), providing on-site organofilization that enhances tack removal effects and fixation of contaminants.

18. “HYBRID SYSTEM FOR CONTAMINANTS CONTROL OF INDUSTRIAL PROCESS”, according to claim 16, wherein it provides periodic control of the ionic demand at the point where the mix of clays is applied, in addition to correspondence with the conductivity measurement, serving as a predictive analysis of abnormal process situations to aid in decision making regarding changes in application strategy.

19. “HYBRID SYSTEM FOR CONTAMINANTS CONTROL OF INDUSTRIAL PROCESS”, according to claim 1, wherein the machine parts and clothing treatment system (101A) provides a “thermodynamic equipment” such as the heat injection pump or heat exchanger (101E) that combines water (101B), vapor (101C) and chemicals (101D) to produce an “active solution” (101F) for cleaning of contaminants.

20. “HYBRID SYSTEM FOR CONTAMINANTS CONTROL OF INDUSTRIAL PROCESS”, according to claim 1, wherein it applies the Internet of Things (IoT) concept to any of the aforementioned continuous treatment systems (101A), (102A) and (103A).

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0038] This Invention Patent application shall be described in detail, referencing the drawings listed below, in which:

[0039] FIG. 1 shows the method 100 which is the core of the continuous chemical treatment for contaminants of paper production processes and explains the “hybrid system” concept referenced herein as “3WAY”;

[0040] FIG. 2 shows a diagram of an example of the mapping of the standard industrial process for production of cellulose 200, comprising the respective characterizations and measurements in key points for control of contaminants;

[0041] FIG. 3A shows a chart that evaluates different additives over a sample of cellulose pulp through measurement of the turbidity differential versus the contaminant count;

[0042] FIG. 3B shows a chart in which the concentration of one of the additives is varied for determining of the calibration curve;

[0043] FIG. 4 shows a diagram that allows observation of the system 102A developed to treat a “clarified water” current under standard conditions found in the paper production sector through combination of advanced technologies aiming at reuse;

[0044] FIGS. 5A and 5B represent, respectively, the technological solution for treatment of residual water currents 104A coming from the petrochemical sector through an advanced oxidation process (diagram) and the respective table with the results obtained (Table 1);

[0045] FIG. 6 shows the summarized flowchart of the treatment system of the cellulose pulp 103A; and

[0046] Lastly, FIG. 7 shows a schematic view of the most important set of equipment that comprise the machine parts and clothing treatment system.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0047] The core of this Invention Patent application, as shown in FIG. 1, is the integration of three treatment systems into a hybrid system referenced herein as “SWAY” in its fully assembled model, supporting the method 100 for continuous treatment that acts in synergy on the “effect” 101, in other words, when the deposits are already formed in different phases of the process, and accumulated on parts of the machine such as the clothing, as well as the “causes” 102 and 103 or, more particularly, before the agglomeration of dissolved or suspended contaminants in colloid state and formation of organic and inorganic deposits.

[0048] Following the concept proposed herein, the treatment system for clothing 101A acts upon the “EFFECT”, removing deposits formed (e.g. pitch-type organic deposits) which are dispersed and stabilized in the water medium until finally discarded as liquid residue for the ETE. On the other hand, the process water treatment system 102A and the cellulose pulp treatment system 103A act upon the “causes”, whereas the first removes and/or degrades contaminants, providing the reuse of water in the process and the second allows both the removal of contaminants and also their fixation to the cellulose fiber, therefore getting “carried” to the process with no collateral effects.

[0049] It should be noted that in a closed “water circuit” system, in which there is no system cleansing, new contaminants are constantly found, in addition to the concentration of additives through process waters, so that, for implementation of the chemical and mechanical strategy described herein, at least two integrated continuous treatment systems are required in the simplified “2WAY” model, always addressing the “effect” and a “cause”, namely: treatment of machine parts and clothing 101A plus treatment of cellulose pulp 103A or treatment of machine parts and clothing 101A plus treatment of process waters 102A aiming at reuse.

[0050] In order to advance in the integration of the continuous treatment systems presented herein, the development of a more effective method for mapping and subsequent monitoring of contaminant levels in different phases of the process becomes a requirement, thus providing quick predictive analyses to aid in decision making on how to balance dosages of chemical additives and operation conditions between the systems in models referenced herein as “SWAY” or “2WAY”.

[0051] Aware of the complexity of deposit composition and that the contaminants may spread in the dissolved and suspended phases in colloid state, before agglomerating and forming larger deposits (above 5 μm), depending on water medium conditions, pH variations, production recipe, temperature and pressure during the process, an initial mapping was devised at first with some “direct measurements” of relevant parameters, which are laborious and susceptible to human error, and afterwards correlate said measurements with “indirect measurements” which may be monitored with increased agility within the operational routine.

[0052] FIG. 2 shows, for example, the initial mapping of a standard industrial process for production of cellulose 200, briefly involving the phases of wood digestion in a digester 201, depuration 202, filter section 203, pressing section 204 and diffusers 205, that comprise the “fiber line”, followed by the “machine circuit”, more precisely from the High Consistency Tank (TAC) 206, passing through the mixing tank 207 and the machine tank 208, then through the silo 209 and white water tower 210 until reaching, at last, the inlet box 211 that marks the entry into cellulose drainage machine 212.

[0053] This specific monitoring has concentrated the evaluation in the “machine circuit”, comprising characterizations in five distinct points of the process, considered relevant to control of contaminants, in addition to the respective measurements of pH, hardness, conductivity, total solids, turbidity, color and contaminant count. In the aforementioned FIG. 2, the five machine points are indicated, respectively, by references 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, related to which measured values of pH, hardness, contaminants, conductivity, total solids, turbidity and color are expressed, and it should be noted that measurement units for such parameters are featured in: pH, hardness (mg/L), contaminants (million cont./cm.sup.3), Conductivity (pS/cm), total solids (%), turbidity (NTU) and color (mg PtCo/L).

[0054] In Point 1 it was obtained the following values: pH=9.96, hardness=60, Contaminants=119, Conductivity=1358, Total Solids=3.14, Turbidity=49 and Color=386; In Point 2 it was obtained the following values: pH=4.84, hardness=20, Contaminants=138, Conductivity=1240, Total Solids=2.45, Turbidity=54 and Color=427; In Point 3 it was obtained the following values: pH=4.86, hardness=40, Contaminants=127, Conductivity=1244, Total Solids=2.97, Turbidity=59 and Color=493; In Point 4 it was obtained the following values: pH=6.73, hardness=100, Contaminants=13, Conductivity=1071, Total Solids=0.07, Turbidity=16 and Color=132; and in Point 5 it was obtained the following values: pH=4.71, hardness=72, Contaminants=142, Conductivity=1257, Total Solids=2.07, Turbidity=59 and Color=451;

[0055] It should be observed, as an example of “direct measurement” specific for pitch and stickies-type suspended organic contaminants, microscopic count of the quantity of contaminants (expressed in million contaminants per cm.sup.3), which may, in theory, be crossed with the “indirect measurement” for turbidity. Another important correlation, in this case for dissolved inorganic contaminants, would be the “direct measurement” for hardness expressed by the CaCO3 contents in solution (mg/L) versus the “indirect measurement” for conductivity expressed in pS/cm.

[0056] The fact is that this theoretical model has not been confirmed for the specific case of the correlation between turbidity and the microscopic count of suspended organic contaminants, as indicated by the measurements carried out on the same point only with samples collected in different days. In Point 5, for example, it was observed a discordant behavior from the contaminant count that increased from 48 to 282 million cont./cm.sup.3 in two analysis rounds carried out in subsequent weeks, while turbidity remained mostly unchanged in the same period.

[0057] In this sense, this Invention Patent application considered the hypothesis that the “turbidity difference” (Δ NTU), before and after a pH “shock” (from 8 to 4, for example) would be a correlative measurement with the contaminant count (million cont./cm.sup.3), since every chemical species susceptible to changes in solubility by the balance of protonated and de-protonated forms features a specific distribution between the dissolved and colloid phases, which, sometimes, may not affect the absolute value of each turbidity measure, but their differential.

[0058] In order to prove this hypothesis, experimental lab conditions were applied, initially evaluating (FIG. 3A) a battery with three different adsorbent additives over the sample cellulose pulp sample, confronting the turbidity differential measurement (A NTU) with the microscopic contaminant count (in million cont./cm3). Afterwards, the best result was selected (in this case additive 3) and the concentration was varied (in kg/t) in order to attest the falling trend in contaminant counting with the increase in turbidity differential, as per FIG. 3B for a wide range of concentrations, although a concentration threshold was hit above 4 kg/t. Therefore, after tracing a robust calibration curve (at least four points), it is perfectly possible to carry out coherent extrapolations on the contaminant level of a sample only through quick measurement of the turbidity differential (A NTU), largely facilitating the monitoring of process contaminants.

[0059] In possession of this methodology, it is possible to identify a sudden change in the level of organic contaminants right at the beginning of the process by the more significant variation of the turbidity differential (A NTU), due to factors such as change in wood composition, thus allowing an increase in dosages of pitch and stickies control additives inside the cellulose pulp treatment system 103A. If said variation spreads to points further ahead in the process, may also act upon the chemical strategy for the machine parts and clothing treatment system 101A, increasing the frequency of preventive shocks or dosage of continuous cleaning chemicals. Clearly, the same principle applies for detection of sudden variations in conductivity, although in this case the focus would be inorganic contaminants, such as calcium.

[0060] Afterwards, each one of the three continuous treatment systems that comprise this technological solution will be detailed, and may be comprised in the models referenced herein as “SWAY” or “2WAY” of the “hybrid system” for control of contaminants in paper production processes and other industry sectors.

Treatment of Process Waters:

[0061] The process water treatment system 102A aiming at reuse is characterized by using one or more advanced technologies, which are: filtration, oxidation and/or distillation. The focus lies in the treatment of “complex residual currents”, which are usually generated in smaller volumes, below 100 m.sup.3/h and ideally between 5 and 20 m.sup.3/h. Said currents must be separated at the point of generation, prior to disposal to the Wastewater Treatment Plant, for potential reuse within the industrial process itself, such as “makeup” with industrial fresh water, important for closed “water circuit” system cleansing or even in applications that require water with high purity, such as “DESMI” water for generation of vapor in boilers or at the Chemicals Products Central for preparation of process additives sensitive to the diluent medium.

[0062] The segregation of these “complex residual currents” takes place through monitoring of certain physical, chemical, and biological parameters along a “decision tree”, in which pollutants are firstly segmented between organic and inorganic, separated into dissolved or suspended in water medium. For dissolved organics, there is also the possibility that these are biodegradable or recalcitrant (non-biodegradable). For suspended pollutants, in general, the macrometric ones are separated from the micrometric ones by particle size, in other words, above or below 5 μm. This way, it is much easier to carry out the analysis of environmental parameters in the “currents”, taking as a criterion, for example, the ratio between the Chemical Oxygen Demand and the Biochemical Oxygen Demand (COD/BOD), whereas if this ratio is higher than five, it indicates the recalcitrant nature of contaminants and, therefore, frames it as a “complex current” in which treatment is recommended through advanced oxidation processes that take place at the multioxidant reactor 102J and/or more recent solutions, such as advanced distillation of high energy efficiency, which occurs at the distilling unit 102G. For suspended micrometric pollutants (<5 μm), on the other hand, advanced membrane filtration techniques must potentially be employed, more particularly ultrafiltration followed by reverse osmosis which shall also be effective for dissolved inorganic pollutants and macromolecular dissolved organic pollutants (with molecular weight higher than 10 kDaltons). Some representative examples are shown below.

[0063] EXAMPLE 1. For a standard treatment situation with a “clarified water current” of a paper machine circuit, having elevated hardness and the presence of various dissolved and colloid contaminants, usually reference values are found in raw water for the main turbidity parameters lower than 100 NTU and hardness lower than 375 ppm of CaCO3. DQO/DBO ratio amounts greatly oscillate, usually around 1.5 (e.g. 6,000/4,000 mg O2/liter), but may reach values above 5 (e.g. 10,000/2,000 mg O2/liter) according to the “water circuit” closure degree and the composition of specific current contaminants.

[0064] As provided in the diagram of FIG. 4, in face of the advancements already attained by our patent BR 102014022402-5 which approached the standard filtration processes associated to chemical adsorption techniques, this invention proposes initial treatment of “clarified water” 102B in a flow of 10 m3/h through a combination of two advanced membrane filtration techniques, more precisely ultrafiltration 102C followed by reverse osmosis 102D, attaining excellent results in treated water with turbidity values lower than 0.2 NTU and hardness lower than 0.5 mg/L of CaCO3.

[0065] The “accepted portion” of this advanced filtering 102E (around 7 m3/h) may immediately be intended for reuse, while the “rejected portion” (approximately 3 m3/h), with a concentrated contaminant load, must proceed in treatment passing through an advanced distillation unit 102G which applies the concept patented in BR 102016010684-2 (extended internationally in WO2017193190 and licensed by us for industrial applications) which attains increased energy efficiency in heat exchange processes. Its “accepted portion” of approximately 2 m3/h, for instance, comprises high purity water, and may be used in more refined reuse applications, such as “DESMI” water for generation of vapor in boilers or in preparation of chemical additives sensitive to the diluent medium. The “rejected portion” 1021 of 1 m3/h, even more concentrated in ionic charge and dissolved organic load, must undergo an advanced oxidation process inside a multioxidant reactor 102J, capable of degrading the residual organic load and also bring remaining ions to the higher oxidation stage, which normally are less toxic species (e.g. sulfide to sulphate). This clarified water (final treated water) 102K may then return to the start of the treatment system, and be released into the “water circuit” in recirculation or sent to the Wastewater Treatment Plant with no further impact to environmental control parameters.

[0066] EXAMPLE 2. As an example of application of treatment technology for process waters aiming at reuse in other industry sectors, more specifically the petrochemical sector which is considered one or the most pollutant, the treatment study is presented for a “phenolic current” (approximately 4 m3/day flow rate), arising out of drainage operations from gasoline processing and that must be separated in a tank for advanced treatment prior to disposal on the ETE, in face of the increased toxicity that affects the balance of biological treatment when phenol levels are found above 50 ppm, keeping in mind that it needs to be reduced below 5 ppm for legal attending within disposal standards.

[0067] Since it is a classic recalcitrant contaminant, which standard treatment methods have almost no effect on, the advanced oxidation process originally developed in our patent BR102013020206-1 was originally chosen as the technological solution, which makes use of pressurized redox systems. It should be noted that, in this specific case, both filtration and advanced distillation processes were not found effective due to specific properties of “phenolic currents”, considered one of the most difficult to treat.

[0068] The technological solution found, as evidenced in the flowchart and figure table 5A and 5B, respectively, passes through the multioxidant reactor 102J which receives the raw “phenolic current” 104A coming from the segregation tank 104 with up to 800 m.sup.3 and combines liquid and/or gas reagents depending on the situation. In this case, only liquid reagents were employed, more particularly the pH corrector 104B in a 2.7 g/L concentration and the oxidizing systems 104C (H.sub.2O.sub.2 50%), 104D (additive) and 104E)(FENTOX®, more specifically 16 g/L of a H.sub.2O.sub.2 50% solution, specific dispersant additive and household catalyst FENTOX® in 50 and 400 mg/L concentrations, respectively. The result is a treated water 104F with pH of 6 and phenol reduction of 99% efficiency, rated as lower than 5 ppm that allows reuse even for some specific applications within the petrochemical process. In aforementioned FIG. 5A, several inlets are indicated for the multioxidant reactor 102J, referenced as 102J1 (for admission of liquid reagent—RL), 102J2 (for admission of gas reagent—RG), 102J3 (for admission of liquid reagent (RL)) and 102J4 (for admission of gas reagent (RG)).

[0069] Obviously, to those skilled in the advanced treatment technologies presented herein, the applicability of the process water treatment system 102A is hereby explained, combined to other continuous treatment systems in the models referenced herein as “SWAY” or “2WAY”, focused on separation of “complex residual currents”, with treatment characteristics similar to the examples treated herein, and various industrial sectors in addition to the paper production sector, such as the chemical industry, textile, tannery, food industry, animal protein industry, pharmochemical, pharma-chemistry, sugar cane, steelworks, metalworks, mining, remediation industries, oil and gas, among others.

Treatment of Cellulose Pulp:

[0070] The cellulose pulp treatment system 103A, on the other hand, is essentially characterized by the application of a new clay mix composition, no longer restricted to polysilicates (e.g. talc for pitch control), combining natural and synthetic microparticles in different proportions, more specifically bentonite and hydrotalcite, which have complementary and synergistic adsorbent properties.

[0071] Such clays are applied as slurries with a high degree of solids and passing through a thermodynamic equipment such as a shearing chamber 103D recently patented by us in BR 10 2019 024382-1, focused in the replacement of talc in paper production processes, which provides better homogenization and friction between the clay slurries, with the spontaneous increase in pressure and temperature, thus maximizing the clay “delamination” process with subsequent increase of surface area and adsorption sites which incorporate the contaminants. In addition, the equipment enables synergistic action of adsorbent clays 103B “Clay 1”—(Bentonite), 103C “Clay 2”—(Hydrotalcite) and 103F “Clay 3” (other chemicals) with the fixative polymer 103E, providing on-site organophilization without degrading the structure of polymeric chains, which enhances “detackifying” effects and attachment of the contaminants to the fiber.

[0072] A key aspect of this application, in order to provide better integration between systems in the models referenced herein as “SWAY” and “2WAY” lies in the monitoring of ionic demand at the point where the mix of slurries will be applied. It is known that the balance of electric charges, more specifically the presence of “anion trash” in suspended the cellulose pulp, has a vital role in the performance of various additives, particularly over cation adsorbents and polymers used herein. Usually, even greater care must be taken when finding anion demands above 100 mV or below 50 mV.

[0073] Therefore, this Invention Patent application comprises periodic control of ionic demand in mV (direct measurement) at the point of application through a MUTEK® equipment 103G, in addition to the correspondence with the “indirect measurement” of conductivity (pS/cm), as seen before, serving as predictive analysis for abnormal process situations, to aid in decision making regarding changes in application strategy of the system such as, for example, a correction at the dosage level of clay slurries and polymers at the entrance of the shearing chamber 103D, aiming to provide contrast to an eventual overload of “anionic trash”.

[0074] FIG. 6 shows the summarized flowchart of the cellulose pulp treatment system 103A, added to the paper or cellulose production line, which provides the natural 103B and synthetic 103C clay mix (e.g. bentonite and hydrotalcite) through the aforementioned thermodynamic equipment 103D. On-site organophilization of clays is carried out by simultaneously adding the fixative polymer 103E which may enter the talc location, in an independent chamber section or replacing the third clay 103F which is optional.

[0075] As already emphasized elsewhere, it should be noted that the model referenced herein as “2WAY”, preferred by this Invention Patent application, provides integration of said cellulose pulp treatment system 103A with the clothing treatment system 101A, thus acting simultaneously on the “cause” and the “effect” of the presence of contaminants in distinct points of the process, in other words, back at the beginning of the process, either in the “fiber line” or in the “machine circuits”, as well as further in the process, more particularly in paper and cellulose machines. Machine parts and clothing Treatment:

[0076] Lastly, the continuous chemical treatment system of machine parts and clothing 101A a thermodynamic equipment such as an injecting heat pump or heat exchanger 101E type that combines water 101B, vapor 101C and chemicals 101D to produce an “active solution” 101F with a high contaminant cleaning power, with benefits to the productivity in paper and cellulose manufacturing machines evidenced in our first patent PI 9715083-5, which received an important amendment in PI 0503029-3 and was internationally extended in WO 2008/012597.

[0077] In general, the main advances were the provision of two or more thermodynamic equipment working in parallel, providing “individual” treatment of clothing, an important innovation for simultaneously addressing various felts and wires with different control conditions, such as temperature, pressure, chemical dosage, among others. Therefore, each clothing has a “customized” treatment due to its unique compaction characteristics and useful life, allowing the reduction of chemical consumption to use only the required amount for cleaning each one.

[0078] Other important innovations added were the use of double-body showers 101H that allow drawing the inner part for cleaning the nozzles 101N without affecting machine productivity and quality of the formed paper sheet, as well as the introduction of a kit comprising a set of equipment allocated in an intermediate strategic position that allows abatement of temperature and pressure to levels between 40 and 60° C. and 1 to 6 bar, respectively. In such condition, the system is flexible for eventual applications of sensitive chemical products such as some enzymatic or polymeric ones in different machine points.

[0079] FIG. 7 shows a schematic view of the most important set of equipment that comprise the machine parts and clothing treatment system 101A, with particular attention to the fresh water feeding line 101B, the vapor line 101C, continuous use or shock treatment chemicals feeding line 101D, injecting heat pumps or heat exchangers 101E, keeping in mind that these are always combined in parallel to allow “individual” treatment of the felts and wires, or any machine parts to which the “pressurized chemical solution” 101F is applied, which is transported through an elevation and pressure maintenance pump 101G up to the double-body showers 101H. Additionally, the pressure and temperature reduction tank 1011 and a series of peripherals may be found, that enable application of polymeric and enzymatic products, which are: dosage pumps 101J, chemicals 101K and enzyme 101L storage containers, as well as two pipelines 101M transported to the tank 1011.

[0080] In order to facilitate the integration between systems in models referenced herein as “SWAY” or “2WAY”, this Invention Patent application provides the application of the concept of Internet of Things—IoT to all continuous process water treatment systems 102A, cellulose pulp treatment systems 103A and machine parts and clothing treatment system 101A, thus allowing data collection, analysis and generation of real-time information, using methods comprising big data, artificial intelligence, machine learning, recommendation algorithms, among others, which are key for quick decision making regarding application processes, more particularly the optimization of application parameters to identify eventual mechanical or chemical strategy flaws, in addition to predictive or automatic corrective interventions on dosages, application points, product exchange, among other functions. Such advances not only enable better integration between systems, but also important aspects for industries in general, which are: better process control, increase in productivity and reduction in consumption of chemicals.

[0081] Lastly, in face of the advancements presented herein, despite particular implementations described and detailed herein, this invention priority Patent application must not be considered as limited to such descriptions. It should, likewise, be evident to those skilled in the various arts involved that any changes, apparent or otherwise, may be incorporated as an integral part of this invention and yet remain in compliance with the scope of the following claims.