Retinal Promoter and Uses Thereof
20210052742 ยท 2021-02-25
Inventors
- Naomi Chadderton (Dublin, IE)
- Gwenyth Jane Farrar (Dublin, IE)
- Killian Hanlon (Dublin, IE)
- Paul F. Kenna (Dublin, IE)
- Arpad Palfi (Dublin, IE)
- Sophia Millington Ward (Dublin, IE)
Cpc classification
A61K48/0058
HUMAN NECESSITIES
C12N2750/14143
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C12N2830/008
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
A61K48/0075
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61K48/005
HUMAN NECESSITIES
International classification
A61K48/00
HUMAN NECESSITIES
Abstract
Disclosed is a promoter for driving expression in the retina. The promoter sequence comprises at least NEFH promoter conserved region A and optionally one or more of NEFH conserved regions D, F, D1, K, B, C and E. Also disclosed are uses of the promoter for directing expression to retinal ganglion cells and uses for the treatment of ocular diseases.
Claims
1-22. (canceled)
23. An isolated nucleic acid molecule having promoter activity, wherein said nucleic acid molecule comprises Neurofilament heavy gene promoter conserved region A and optionally one or more of Neurofilament heavy gene promoter conserved regions D, F, D1, K, B, C and E, wherein said nucleic acid molecule comprises no more than three of the group of Neurofilament heavy gene promoter conserved regions consisting of Neurofilament heavy gene promoter conserved regions D, F, D1, and K and no more than four of the group of Neurofilament heavy gene promoter conserved regions consisting of Neurofilament heavy gene promoter conserved regions D, F, B, C, and E; wherein Neurofilament heavy gene promoter conserved region A is a nucleotide sequence having the nucleotide sequence shown as SEQ ID NO: 1, or a functional variant thereof; Neurofilament heavy gene promoter conserved region D is a nucleotide sequence having the nucleotide sequence shown as SEQ ID NO: 2, or a functional variant thereof; Neurofilament heavy gene promoter conserved region F is a nucleotide sequence having the nucleotide sequence shown as SEQ ID NO: 3, or a functional variant thereof; Neurofilament heavy gene promoter conserved region D1 is a nucleotide sequence having the nucleotide sequence shown as SEQ ID NO: 4, or a functional variant thereof; Neurofilament heavy gene promoter conserved region K is a nucleotide sequence having the nucleotide sequence shown as SEQ ID NO: 5, or a functional variant thereof; Neurofilament heavy gene promoter conserved region B is a nucleotide sequence having the nucleotide sequence shown as SEQ ID NO: 6, or a functional variant thereof; Neurofilament heavy gene promoter conserved region C is a nucleotide sequence having the nucleotide sequence shown as SEQ ID NO: 7, or a functional variant thereof; and Neurofilament heavy gene promoter conserved region E is a nucleotide sequence having the nucleotide sequence shown as SEQ ID NO: 8, or a functional variant thereof.
24. The isolated nucleic acid molecule according to claim 23, wherein of Neurofilament heavy gene promoter conserved regions D, F, D1, K, B, C and E, the isolated nucleic acid molecule comprises fewer than three.
25. The isolated nucleic acid molecule according to claim 23, wherein, of Neurofilament heavy gene promoter conserved regions A, D, F, D1, K, B, C and E said isolated nucleic acid molecule comprises only conserved region A.
26. The isolated nucleic acid molecule according to claim 23, wherein, of Neurofilament heavy gene promoter conserved regions A, D, F, D1, K, B, C and E, said isolated nucleic acid molecule comprises only conserved regions A and F.
27. (canceled)
28. The isolated nucleic acid molecule according to claim 23, wherein the isolated nucleic acid molecule comprises each of Neurofilament heavy gene promoter conserved region A, Neurofilament heavy gene promoter conserved region D, and Neurofilament heavy gene promoter conserved region F.
29. The isolated nucleic acid molecule according to claim 23, wherein the isolated nucleic acid molecule comprises at least one of the conserved regions selected from: Neurofilament heavy gene promoter conserved region D1 and Neurofilament heavy gene promoter conserved region K;
30. The isolated nucleic acid molecule according to claim 23, wherein the isolated nucleic acid molecule comprises between two recited conserved regions a spacer sequence of a length in the range 20-180% of the sequence separating said recited conserved regions in the nucleic acid sequence shown as SEQ ID NO: 21.
31-32. (canceled)
33. The isolated nucleic acid molecule according to claim 23, wherein the isolated nucleic acid molecule comprises at least one of the conserved regions selected from: Neurofilament heavy gene promoter conserved region B, Neurofilament heavy gene promoter conserved region C, and Neurofilament heavy gene promoter conserved region E;
34. The isolated nucleic acid molecule according to claim 33, wherein, of Neurofilament heavy gene promoter conserved regions B, C, and E, the isolated nucleic acid molecule comprises only one or two.
35. The isolated nucleic acid molecule according to claim 33, wherein the isolated nucleic acid molecule comprises between two recited conserved regions a spacer sequence of a length in the range 20-180% of the sequence separating said recited conserved regions in the nucleic acid sequence shown as SEQ ID NO: 22.
36-37. (canceled)
38. A method of treatment of ocular disease, wherein said method comprises administering to an eye an isolated nucleic acid molecule having promoter activity, wherein said nucleic acid molecule comprises at least Neurofilament heavy gene promoter conserved region A and optionally one or more of Neurofilament heavy gene promoter conserved regions D, F, D1, K, B, C and E; wherein Neurofilament heavy gene promoter conserved region A is a nucleotide sequence having the nucleotide sequence shown as SEQ ID NO: 1, or a functional variant thereof; Neurofilament heavy gene promoter conserved region D is a nucleotide sequence having the nucleotide sequence shown as SEQ ID NO: 2, or a functional variant thereof; Neurofilament heavy gene promoter conserved region F is a nucleotide sequence having the nucleotide sequence shown as SEQ ID NO: 3, or a functional variant thereof; Neurofilament heavy gene promoter conserved region D1 is a nucleotide sequence having the nucleotide sequence shown as SEQ ID NO: 4, or a functional variant thereof; Neurofilament heavy gene promoter conserved region K is a nucleotide sequence having the nucleotide sequence shown as SEQ ID NO: 5, or a functional variant thereof; Neurofilament heavy gene promoter conserved region B is a nucleotide sequence having the nucleotide sequence shown as SEQ ID NO: 6, or a functional variant thereof; Neurofilament heavy gene promoter conserved region C is a nucleotide sequence having the nucleotide sequence shown as SEQ ID NO: 7, or a functional variant thereof; and Neurofilament heavy gene promoter conserved region E is a nucleotide sequence having the nucleotide sequence shown as SEQ ID NO: 8, or a functional variant thereof.
39. The method according to claim 38, wherein the isolated nucleic acid molecule comprises each of Neurofilament heavy gene promoter conserved region A, Neurofilament heavy gene promoter conserved region D, and Neurofilament heavy gene promoter conserved region F.
40. The method according to claim 38, wherein the isolated nucleic acid molecule comprises each of Neurofilament heavy gene promoter conserved regions A, D, F, D1, and K.
41. The method according to claim 40, wherein the isolated nucleic acid molecule comprises each of Neurofilament heavy gene promoter conserved regions A, D, F, D1, and K having the nucleic acid sequences shown as SEQ ID NOS: 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 respectively.
42. The method according to claim 40, wherein the isolated nucleic acid molecule consists of the nucleic acid sequence shown as SEQ ID NO: 21.
43. The method according to claim 38, wherein the isolated nucleic acid molecule comprises each of Neurofilament heavy gene promoter conserved regions A, D, F, B, C, and E.
44. (canceled)
45. The method according to claim 43, wherein the isolated nucleic acid molecule consists of the nucleic acid sequence shown as SEQ ID NO: 22
46. The method according to claim 43, wherein the isolated nucleic acid molecule comprises each of Neurofilament heavy gene promoter conserved regions A, D, F, B, C, and E having the nucleic acid sequences shown as SEQ ID NOS: 10, 13, 16, 18, 19, and 20 respectively.
47-48. (canceled)
49. The isolated nucleic acid molecule according to claim 23, wherein said nucleic acid molecule having promoter activity provides preferential expression of said one or more heterologous polynucleotide sequences in the ganglion cell layer of the eye.
50. A vector comprising the isolated nucleic acid according to claim 23.
51-54. (canceled)
55. A therapeutic composition comprising the isolated nucleic acid molecule according to claim 23.
56. (canceled)
57. The method according to claim 38, wherein the ocular disease is Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy (LHON), dominant optic atophy (DOA), or glaucoma.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0046] The foregoing and other objects, features and advantages of the present invention, as well as the invention itself, will be more fully understood from the following description of preferred embodiments when read together with the accompanying drawings, in which:
[0047]
[0048]
[0049]
[0050]
[0051]
[0052]
[0053]
[0054]
[0055]
[0056]
[0057]
[0058]
[0059]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0060] The invention relates to use of conserved sequences from the upstream sequence of the Nefh gene to enhance expression of genes. In a particular apect the invention relates to use of such conserved sequences to enhance expression of genes from adeno associated virus (AAV) vectors.
[0061] Specifically, the invention utilises the nucleic acid molecule comprising at least one of the conserved regions selected from: Nefh promoter conserved region A; Nefh promoter conserved region D, and Nefh promoter conserved region F.
[0062] Additionally, the isolated nucleic acid molecule of the first aspect of the invention optionally may further comprise at least one of the conserved regions selected from: NEFH promoter conserved region D1, and NEFH promoter conserved region K.
[0063] Furthermore, the isolated nucleic acid molecule of the first aspect of the invention optionally may further comprise at least one of the conserved regions selected from: Nefh promoter conserved region B, Nefh promoter conserved region C, and Nefh promoter conserved region E.
[0064] NEFH promoter conserved region A is a nucleotide sequence having the nucleotide sequence shown as SEQ ID NO: 1, or a functional variant thereof, NEFH promoter conserved region D is a nucleotide sequence having the nucleotide sequence shown as SEQ ID NO: 2, or a functional variant thereof; and NEFH promoter conserved region F is a nucleotide sequence having the nucleotide sequence shown as SEQ ID NO: 3, or a functional variant thereof. NEFH promoter conserved region D1 is a nucleotide sequence having the nucleotide sequence shown as SEQ ID NO: 4, or a functional variant thereof, NEFH promoter conserved region K is a nucleotide sequence having the nucleotide sequence shown as SEQ ID NO: 5, or a functional variant thereof. Nefh promoter conserved region B is a nucleotide sequence having the nucleotide sequence shown as SEQ ID NO: 6, or a functional variant thereof, Nefh promoter conserved region C is a nucleotide sequence having the nucleotide sequence shown as SEQ ID NO: 7, or a functional variant thereof; and Nefh promoter conserved region E is a nucleotide sequence having the nucleotide sequence shown as SEQ ID NO: 8, or a functional variant thereof.
[0065] In the context of the present invention, a functional variant includes any variant nucleic acid or that may have one or more nucleic acid substitutions but that does not have a materially different function than, or that can still hybridize under stringent hybridization conditions (0.2SSC, 0.1% SDS) to, or that shares at least 60% identity, for example at least 65% identity, such as at least 70% identity, for example at least 80% identity, such as at least 90% identity or at least 95% sequence identity with the nucleotide sequence or nucleic acid indicated. A functional variant preferably retains at least 10%, for example 20%, 35%, 50%, 70%, 80%, 90% or greater of the functional activity of the sequence indicated. Thus, for example, where said sequence is a promoter said functional activity is promoter activity.
[0066] Particular examples of Nefh promoter conserved region A which are functional variants of the human nucleotide sequence shown as SEQ ID NO: 1 include the nucleotide sequences shown as murine SEQ ID NO:9, murine SEQ ID NO:10, and rhesus macaque SEQ ID NO:11.
TABLE-US-00005 SEQIDNO:9 SEQIDNO:9 CCAGCCCCGCCCCTCTCACTGCGGAGAAGCCGGTCGGCCCGGGGCCGCGG GGGAGGAGGTGGAGAGGGTGGGGCCCTCCTCCCCAGCCCCCCACTGCCGA GGGGCCGGACCGGGCCACCGCGGATATAAAAGAGCCGGAGTCCCAGAGCT GCCGCAGTGCTGCCTGCCCCGTCCCAGCCCCGCACTCCCGCTC SEQIDNO:10 SEQIDNO:10 CCCAGCCCCGCCCCTCTCACTGCGGAGAA GCCGGTCGGCCCGGGGCCGCGGGGGAGGAGGTGGAGAGGGTGGGGCCCTC CTCCCCAGCCCCCCACTGCCGAGGGGCCGGACCGGGCCACCGCGGATATA AAAGAGCCGGAGTCCCAGAGCTGCCGCAGTGCTGCCTGCCCCGTCCCAGC CCCGCACTCCCGCTC SEQIDNO:11 SEQIDNO:11 CCCTACCCCGCCCCTCTCACTGCGGCTGAGCCGGTCAGCCGGGGGCCGCA GGGGAGGAG GCGGAGAGGGCGGGGCCCTCCTCCCCACCCCCTCACTGACAAGGGGTTGG ACCCGGCCGC GGCGGCTATAAAAGGGCCGGCGCCCTGGTGCTGCCGCAGTGCCTCCAGCC CCGTCCCGGC CCCGCGCACCTGCTC
[0067] Particular examples of human NEFH promoter conserved region D which are functional variants of the nucleotide sequence shown as SEQ ID NO: 2 include the nucleotide sequences shown as murine SEQ ID NO:12, murine SEQ ID NO:13, and rhesus macaque SEQ ID NO:14.
TABLE-US-00006 SEQIDNO:12 SEQIDNO:12 GGAAAACCAAACATAGGAGAACACAATTTGTACAAGGTCATTC SEQIDNO:13 SEQIDNO:13 TGCATCTTGTCTCTTGCACACAAGGGAAAACCAAACATAGGAGAACACAA TTTGTACAAGGTCATTCAGCTAGCGAAGCACAGAAGCTAACCCC SEQIDNO:14 SEQIDNO:14 GGAAAAACAAGGGTGGGAGAATACAGCTCGTCCAAGGTCATTC
[0068] Particular examples of human NEFH promoter conserved region F which are functional variants of the nucleotide sequence shown as SEQ ID NO: 3 include the nucleotide sequences shown as murine SEQ ID NO:15, murine SEQ ID NO:16, and rhesus macaque SEQ ID NO:17.
TABLE-US-00007 SEQIDNO:15 SEQIDNO:15 AAATCCAAGCAGTATGGGAGATAAATGGGGAAGCCATGTGGGCGTAAGGG GGTAGAGGTCTGCATCCCAGTCCCCTCCCCATGGCATCTGCAGTGCCTCC CAGCCTTTCTGACCCCTGCAAAGAGCAGCATGACTGGACCTTTAAATTGG GAAAATGCTTCATCATGTTCTGCTCCATCATGAAAAACTAGAGTCTCCTC SEQIDNO:16 SEQIDNO:16 TGCTGTCAACTGCTTGTCAGACTTCTCACCCCCAAGAAGGGCATGTGC ATTCTGCAGACAACTGAAGAGACTCGAAGGAACAAGAATCTAATAACAAA AATCCAAGCAGTATGGGAGATAAATGGGGAAGCCATGTGGGCGTAAGGGG GTAGAGGTCTGCATCCCAGTCCCCTCCCCATGGCATCTGCAGTGCCTCCC AGCCTTTCTGACCCCTGCAAAGAGCAGCATGACTGGACCTTTAAATTGGG AAAATGCTTCATCATGTTCTGCTCCATCATGAAAAACTAGAGTCTCCTCC CCCTCCTCCCTAGTGCACTCTCCT SEQIDNO:17 SEQIDNO:17 TGCTGTCAGCTGCTTGTGAGCCTTCTCACATCCAGAGAATATATCAGCAT TCTGCAGACCGAAAAGACCCAGAGGAACAAGGCTCCAATGGCAAAATTCC AAGTAGAATGACAAATAAATGGGGAGCCATTTGAGAGCAAGGGAGTCCTG CCCAACACCCCCTCCCCATGCCTTTCTCAGGGACCTCAGACCAGCCACTC ACCTCCATCCTCCCAGAACCACCTGCAACCAGCCCGTTGCCCCTTGCAAA CTGGAGCATGACTGGATCTTTAGATGGGGGAAAAATGCTTCATCATGTTC TGCTTCTTCATGCAAAACCAGAAACTCCCTCCCCCTCTTCCCTCCTCCCA GCGCACTCTCCT
[0069] A particular example of murine Nefh promoter conserved region B which is a functional variant of the nucleotide sequence shown as SEQ ID NO: 6 is the nucleotide sequence shown as SEQ ID NO:18.
TABLE-US-00008 SEQIDNO:18 SEQIDNO:18 TCTAACT
[0070] A particular example of murine Nefh promoter conserved region C which is a functional variant of the nucleotide sequence shown as SEQ ID NO:7 is the nucleotide sequence shown as SEQ ID NO:19.
TABLE-US-00009 SEQIDNO:19 SEQIDNO:19 GCGCTCCCTTTCTCCGTCTGCAGTGTTCTCCTTCTCAGGGTAGCTTTGCG GTCCTTTCAAACTCCACGCCC
[0071] A particular example of murine Nefh promoter conserved region E which is a functional variant of the nucleotide sequence shown as SEQ ID NO: 8 is the nucleotide sequence shown as SEQ ID NO:20.
TABLE-US-00010 SEQIDNO:20 SEQIDNO:20 ATTTAACCCTTCCCATCCGAGGAGCGGCTGCTGTCCGTGGTGCTGAAGCG ATAGCGGCACGGGCGGCTCCGTCCACTAAC
[0072] As described above, in certain embodiments of the invention, the isolated nucleic acid molecule of the first aspect of the invention comprises each of conserved regions A, D1, D, F, and K. In one such embodiment, the isolated nucleic acid molecule comprises a full length NEFH promoter sequence such as that shown as SEQ ID NO:21.
[0073] In another embodiment, the isolated nucleic acid molecule comprises a full length Nefh promoter sequence such as that shown as SEQ ID NO:22.
TABLE-US-00011 SEQIDNO:22 SEQIDNO:22 TGTGCTGTCAACTGCTTGTCAGACTTCTCACCCCCAAGAAGGGCATGTGC ATTCTGCAGACAACTGAAGAGACTCGAAGGAACAAGAATCTAATAACAAA AATCCAAGCAGTATGGGAGATAAATGGGGAAGCCATGTGGGCGTAAGGGG GTAGAGGTCTGCATCCCAGTCCCCTCCCCATGGCATCTGCAGTGCCTCCC AGCCTTTCTGACCCCTGCAAAGAGCAGCATGACTGGACCTTTAAATTGGG AAAATGCTTCATCATGTTCTGCTCCATCATGAAAAACTAGAGTCTCCTCC CCCTCCTCCCTAGTGCACTCTCCTGGCCTGCAGCCAGGGGCTGGGAATGA GACACAGGACAGGAAAGGGATCTCTTTTAGGGAATCTATCAGTTCTCCTC CTAGGGATCCCTCCAAAAGAGAAAACCACAGCAAACTGGGGTGCAGTGAG GCTTGAGGTAACTGCCTGGGAGAAGTTCTGATCTGAAGAAGTCTATACTG GTTTCCAGAGCTTGTCAGTGGGCATTGGAGTGGGGCTCTCTCTGCTCCGG GAAGAGGTTTGCAGGGAGAAAGAACTTCACAGAGAGCCAGGCACTGGACA GGACATGCAGGGGTGGGTCACTTACATACAACCGTAGGTCGTTTCGAGCC CGTCATATGACTCATCCAATCCTCCCCTGTACCGCACAGAGGGACTGCTT GGAAAAGCTATGGAACCTCCCTACTCCGTTAGGCATAGATTTAACCCTTC CCATCCGAGGAGCGGCTGCTGTCCGTGGTGCTGAAGCGATAGCGGCACGG GCGGCTCCGTCCACTAACACCGCTTTTGACCGGAAAACCAAACCAAGAAC GAGCCGTATAATAAAGCAAGAGCTCCAAGTCTAAGCCCCTCCGCCGTCCC CGCCCTTTCACCTGAAGCCTCAGTAGGGCTCATGATGGAGGTCGGTGGAC TTTGGTACTGAAAAACCACTCCACCACTTCCTCGGAGCATGAAAGGGGAT GCTTACGGCAGTACTGGTTCATCTATTCTGGAAAAGGAATGAGATGCCAA GATAAAGCAGAAAAATCGGGCAAGGAAGGGAGAAAGACAAAGTTCTCAGG TGAGAGGAACTGGTTACTATTCCGACTGGCAATATGTGGGTTCTCCTCCC CAAAATCAGCCAGACATTTCCCAAGTTCGAACCTCCTAGGGGCACATGGG AGCTTGGAGCTGCATCTTGTCTCTTGCACACAAGGGAAAACCAAACATAG GAGAACACAATTTGTACAAGGTCATTCAGCTAGCGAAGCACAGAAGCTAA CCCCACCCTGTGGCAGAACTTGGCTTCGGTGTTGAGGCTCTTGCTGCCTA CTGAGGGACCCCCTGTTCTTCGTAGGCAGTTTTCCTTTCCGGGCAAGAGG AGACTCCACTTTCCAGTCGTGGCCACTGGAATTTTTAGAGAGCACCACGT TCCTCTCACCCAGCGCTCCCTTTCTCCGTCTGCAGTGTTCTCCTTCTCAG GGTAGCTTTGCGGTCCTTTCAAACTCCACGCCCACCCCAACCCCAACCCC GAAGCCAGCTGTACAGTTCCTTAAGCCCCTTTGGGTGGCCCAGGGCCGCT GTAGTATCTGGGGAACACTGCACCGCCAGCTAGAAGGTCCCCATTTATCA TCAGTAGCATCCATCATGCAACCCCATACAGAATCCCTTCGTGGGTGACT GCAGTCTGCACTCCTCATCTCAAGGTCCTCTCTAACTATCAGGGAACCAA CCCTGTGCTGCTTCTCAAGTGGGGGTGTCCTCTCATAGTAATCACTGCAG TCTCCCACTGCTTCAACCCGAAGGCGCCCTGACCCATCAGTTCTGCAATC CTCTCCCTATTTCCAGTGCCCTCTCTTATTCTGAGGGTCTTATTCTGACT AATAGGGTCTTCCGACATGCACCTGGAGGTCTGCACTTGTCCGCTCCGGA AGTCCTTTACTCCTTGGTCTGACCTCGGGAGGCTCTACTGACGATGCGTC GATTCCCCTTCACTCCTGGGTCGTCCCCCCCAGCCCCGCCCCTCTCACTG CGGAGAAGCCGGTCGGCCCGGGGCCGCGGGGGAGGAGGTGGAGAGGGTGG GGCCCTCCTCCCCAGCCCCCCACTGCCGAGGGGCCGGACCGGGCCACCGC GGATATAAAAGAGCCGGAGTCCCAGAGCTGCCGCAGTGCTGCCTGCCCCG TCCCAGCCCCGCACTCCCGCTCCGCTGGCGGCCGCACCTGCTCCGGCCAT G
[0074] In another embodiment, the isolated nucleic acid molecule comprises a full length rhesus macaque Nefh promoter sequence such as that shown as SEQ ID NO:23.
TABLE-US-00012 SEQIDNO:23 SEQIDNO:23 CAGTCCCTCTTGGAGCCCCCTTTTTACCCCAAATCCCTAGTCCTCTTTGC TGTCAGCTGCTTGTGAGCCTTCTCACATCCAGAGAATATATCAGCATTCT GCAGACCGAAAAGACCCAGAGGAACAAGGCTCCAATGGCAAAATTCCAAG TAGAATGACAAATAAATGGGGAGCCATCTGAGAGCAAGGGAGTCCTGCCC AACACCCCCTCCCCATGCCTTTCTCAGGGACCTCAGACCAGCCACTCACC TCCATCCTCCCAGAACCACCTGCAACCAGCCCGTTGCCCCTTGCAAACTG GAGCATGACTGGATCTTTAGATGGGGGAAAAATGCTTCATCATGTTCTGC TTCTTCATGCAAAACCAGAAACTCCCTCCCCCTCTTCCCTCCTCCCAGCG CACTCTCCTTCCAGTAAAACATGGTTAAAGGGACAGCGCCATCACTTTCC CAGCTCTGAGGGTCTGCTTAGAACCAGGGGCCTTGGAAGGAGACAGAGGG CAAAGAGAAAGGAACTGGCAGAGGTCTTTCCTGGGGGATCTGTCTGTTCT GTCCTGGGAATCCTGGAGCAGGAAAACTCGGGTAAAGTGGGGGTGTAGTG GGGGTTGAGATAACCGCCTGGGGGAGATTCAGAGTGCAAGTAGGAGTCTA CAAACTCTCAAGGGGGTCTCAGGGCTCCCGGCATCCCCAGGGGTCCTTTC GCAGGGGTCCCTATGCAGGAGGAGAACAGCCCAGAAAACAGGGAACTAGA CCCTTGACAGGAAGTCCAAGGAGGGGTCCCTGGCTCACTGTGTGACCCTG CTGGATCACTCGCCTCCGCTCTCGGGTCCCCTGAGCACTCCGTGCCTCCC TTCCCTCCCCTAAAGTAAAAGCAGAAGTTAATCGCTTTCCCCTCCCCACG CCCAACAAAGAGCAGGCCCTGTCCCCGGTGCTGAAGCGCCAGCCGCAGCG CCTCCCCCACTCCCAAGGCATAAAACATGAGCCAAAACCAATAAAGAACC AAATGTCACAGCTGTTGCAGGGCCCCCTAAGTCCCGGGGACCCCTTTTTC TACCTGACATCCTAGTGGGGTGAGGGACTTTTGTACCTGGAAAGCATCCC ATCACTTCCCTGGAAGCGAGAAGGGATGCCGACTCAGGCGCCTGCTTGTC TGTTATGGGGGTAGGGGACCAGAGAACAAGTTGAGGCTGAGAAGATGGGG AGGGGGAGGGAGAAAAGAGGACTTCATAGTGGCGAGAGAACGGCAAGATG TGGGTTCCCCATCCCCAATTCAGCCAGAGACCCCTCAAAGTGGAACTTCC TGGGGCAGTCGGGGGTCAGAAGTTGGAGCTTGTCTCTGGGGCAAGACCTC TTCGTTGTACAGATGGAAAAACAAGGGTGGGAGAATACAGCTCGTCCAAG GTCATTCGACTAGCAAACTGCTTAGCTGACCCTAGTGTGCAGAACCTGGC TCGGGTGACACCCATCATTTCCCCCCACCCCACACAGGCGCCAGCTCTCT CAATTTCATGCTCAAGCCCCGCTACGGTACCCCCACTGTGGGTTATCTGC CCCTCAAACTCAGCCCAGCTTCCTCCTGCCTATTCGGGGAACCCTCTGCC CGCTTCGCTGAGGGTCCGTCCCCTTTACTGGGGATGGCAGCAGGGTCTCC TGTCTCCTCTCTCGGGGGGCCACTGCCGACTTTTCATAGAACGCTTTGCC CCCTCCCAACCCCACCCATCCGGGGTTCCCTCTCTCCATCCTCTGCAGCG TCTCCCATACCCCCATTGAGGGTAGTCTTGGTATTCTCCCCAACTCCAGG TCCCCCTTCATCTATTCCAGGGCTGGCCGCGGAGTTTCCTGAGCGCTCTC CAAGTGGGTCCTCTAGATGTTAGGAGAACACTGTACTTCCCCCCGTCAGG GGTCTCCTGTCTCCGTTCTATGGAGCGTCCATGCTCCCATTCAGGACTGT CTTGCTCCCTCCTCTATTCCGGGGCTGGCTGCACAGTCTCTGTACCCCCT ATCCTGAGGGCCTCTCTTAACTATTTGGAAAGCCTCGTGTCCTCTCTCAT ACGGGGATCCCTTCATCCTAATGACTGCAATCTTCCATTGCTCCATCCCT AGGGCATCCTGCCCCTATTCCCATCAGGTTTCTCCTTGTCCTCTCCCTGT TTCAAGTCCCCTTTCTTATTCCGAACACACTCTCAGGCTCTTCCGACGCA TACCCGGGGGTCCTCACTGGCCCACTCCGGGAGTCCTCTGCCCGCTACCC CGAACTCGGGGGTCTCCTCTGACGCAGCGTCGATTCCCCTTCCCTCCTCG GTCCCCTACCCCGCCCCTCTCACTGCGGCTGAGCCGGTCAGCCGGGGGCC GCAGGGGAGGAGGCGGAGAGGGCGGGGCCCTCCTCCCCACCCCCTCACTG ACAAGGGGTTGGACCCGGCCGCGGCGGCTATAAAAGGGCCGGCGCCCTGG TGCTGCCGCAGTGCCTCCAGCCCCGTCCCGGCCCCGCGCACCTGCTCCGG C
[0075] As described above, in certain embodiments of the invention, the isolated nucleic acid molecule need not comprise a full length NEFH promoter sequence but may comprise, for example, only one, two, three, four or five of the Nefh promoter conserved regions A, D, F, B, C and E, or, for example only one, two, three or four of the NEFH promoter conserved regions A, D, F, D1, and K.
[0076] In another embodiment, the isolated nucleic acid molecule may comprise, for example, only two of the Nefh promoter conserved regions A, D, F, B, C and E, or, for example only two of the NEFH promoter conserved regions A, D, F, D1 and K separated by a spacer sequence such as a piece of lambda DNA such as that shown as SEQ ID NO:24.
TABLE-US-00013 SEQIDNO:24 SEQIDNO:24 AGGCATTTATACTCCGCTGGAAGCGCGTGTGTATTGCTCACAATAATTGC ATGAGTTGCCCATCGATATGGGCAACTCTATCTGCACTGCTCATTAATAT ACTTCTGGGTTCCTTCCAGTTGTTTTTGCATAGTGATCAGCCTCTCTCTG AGGGTGAAATAATCCCGTTCAGCGGTGTCTGCCAGTCGGGGGGAGGCTGC ATTATCCACGCCGGAGGCGGTGGTGGCTTCACGCACTGACTGACAGACTG CTTTGATGTGCAACCGACGACGACCAGCGGCAACATCATCACGCAGAGCA TCATTTTCAGCTTTAGCATCAGCTAACTCCTTCGTGTATTTTGCATCGAG CGCAGCAACATCACGCTGACGCATCTGCATGTCAGTAATTGCCGCGTTCG CCAGCTTCAGTTCTCTGGCATTTTTGTCGCGCTGGGCTTTGTAGGTAATG GCGTTATCACGGTAATGATTAACAGCCCATGACAGGCAGACGATGATGCA GATAACCAGAGCGGAGATAATCGCGGTGACTCTGCTCATACATCAATCTC TCTGACCGTTCCGCCCGCTTCTTTGAATTTTGCAATCAGGCTGTCAGCCT TATGCTCGAACTGACCATAACCAGCGCCCGGCAGTGAAGCCCAGATATTG CTGCAACGGTCGATTGCCTGACGGATATCACCACGATCAATCATAGGTAA AGCGCCACGCTCCTTAATCTGCTGCAATGCCACAGCGTCCTGACTTTTCG GAGAGAAGTCTTTCAGGCCAAGCTGCTTGCGGTAGGCATCCCACCAACGG GAAAGAAGCTGGTAGCGTCCGGCGCCTGTTGATTTGAGTTTTGGGTTTAG CGTGACAAGTTTGCGAGGGTGATCGGAGTAATCAGTAAATAGCTCTCCGC CTACAATGACGTCATAACCATGATTTCTGGTTTTCTGACGTCCGTTATCA GTTCCCTCCGACCACGCCAGCATATCGAGGAACGCCTTACGTTGATTATT GATTTCTACCATCTTCTACTCCGGCTTTTTTAGCAGCGAAGCGTTTGATA AGCGAACCAATCGAGTCAGTACCGATGTAGCCGATAAACACGCTCGTTAT ATAAGCGAGATTGCTACTTAGTCCGGCGAAGTCGAGAAGGTCACGAATGA ACCAGGCGATAATGGCGCACATCGTTGCGTCGATTACTGTTTTTGTAAAC GCACCGCCATTATATCTGCCGCGAAGGTACGCCATTGCAAACGCAAGGAT TGCCCCGATGCCTTGTTCCTTTGCCGCGAGAATGGCGGCCAACAGGTCAT GTTTTTCTGGCATCTTCATGTCTTACCCCCAATAAGGGGATTTGCTCTAT TTAATTAGGAATAAGGTCGATTACTGATAGAACAAATCCAGGCTACTGTG TTTAGTAATCAGATTTGTTCGTGACCGATATGCACGGGCAAAACGGCAGG AGGTTGTTAGCGCGACCTCCTGCCACCCGCTTTCACGAAGGTCATGTGTA AAAGGCCGCAGCGTAACTATTACTAATGAATTCAGGACAGACAGTGGCTA CGGCTCAGTTTGGGTTGTGCTGTTGCTGGGCGGCGATGACGCCTGTACGC ATTTGGTGATCCGGTTCTGCTTCCGGTATTCGCTTAATTCAGCACAACGG AAAGAGCACTGGCTAACCAGGCTCGCCGACTCTTCACGATTATCGACTCA ATGCTCTTACCTGTTGTGCAGATATAAAAAATCCCGAAACCGTTATGCAG GCTCTAACTATTACCTGCGAACTGTTTCGGGATTGCATTTTGCAGACCTC TCTGCCTGCGATGGTTGGAGTTCCAGACGATACGTCGAAGTGACCAACTA GGCGGAATCGGTAGTA
Vectors
[0077] As described above the promoter molecule and the expression cassette of the invention can be provided in a vector. In an embodiment, the promoter molecule and the expression cassette can be delivered to a cell using any suitable vector. For example, the vectors which may be used include viral and non-viral vectors, such as AAV serotypes, adenovirus, herpes virus, SV40, HIV, SIV and other lentiviral vectors, RSV and non-viral vectors including naked DNA, plasmid vectors, peptide-guided gene delivery, terplex gene delivery systems, calcium phosphate nanoparticles, magnetic nanoparticles, colloidal microgels and/or the integrase system from bacteriophage phiC31. Viral vectors useful in the invention include, but are not limited to, those listed in Table 1. Non-viral vectors useful in the invention include, but are not limited to, those listed in Table 2. Cationic lipid-based non-viral vectors can include glycerol-based (e.g. DOTMA, DOTAP, DMRIE, DOSPA), non-glycerol-based (e.g. DOGS, DOTIM) and/or cholesterol-based cationic lipids (e.g. BGTC, CTAP; Ju et al., 2015; Karmali and Chaudhuri, 2007; Lee et al., 2016). Viral and non-viral vector delivery may be accompanied by other molecules such as cationic lipids and/or polymers and/or detergents and/or agents to alter pH, such as, for example, polyethelene glycol (PEG), to enhance cellular uptake of vectors and/or to enhance expression from vectors and/or to evade the immune system. For example, polycationic molecules have been generated to facilitate gene delivery including but not exclusive to cationic lipids, poly-amino acids, cationic block co-polymers, cyclodextrins amongst others. Pegylation of vectors with polyethelene glycol (PEG) can shield vectors from, for example, the extracellular environment. Vectors may be used in conjunction with agents to avoid or minimise cellular immune responses such as PEG or as a Polyplex with Poly (L-Lysine) among others. Exosomes may be used to aid vector delivery and or evasion of the immune response (Wassmer et al., 2017). Vectors may be delivered in conjunction with immunomodulatory/immunosuppression regimes to aid transgene expression. Vector delivery may be undertaken using physical methodologies such as electroporation, nucleofection and/or ionotophoresis, either alone or in combination with molecules to enhance delivery. Vectors may be used in conjunction with agents to promote expression of transgenes incorporated into vectors, for example, using histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDAC) and/or DNA methyl transferase inhibitors and/or histone methyl transferase inhibitors to modulate chromatin structures thereby aiding expression. HDAC inhibitors include but are not exclusive to short chain fatty acids such as valproic acid and sodium butyrate, ketones, benzamides, cyclic and non-cyclic hydroxamates such as suberoyl anilide hydroxamic acids (SAHA), trichostatin A (TSA), cyclic peptides or tetrapeptides amongst others (Daly et al., 2016; Liu et al., 2006; Ververis et al., 2013). DNA methyl transfease inhibitors including, for example, 5-AC, decitabine and zebularine can be used to modulate chromatin structures. In addition, histone methyl transferase inhibitors can influence chromatin states, for example, BIX-01294 (diazepin-quinazolin-amine derivative). In addition, to the chemical entities referred to above, nucleic acids-based inhibitors can be used to suppress expression of proteins and/or non-coding RNAs involved in chromatin remodelling. In one embodiment of the invention vectors are optimized to specifically transduce target cell type(s) or target tissue type(s). Viral and/or non-viral vectors may be modified to target specific cell types and/or to prevent targeting of some cell types. For example, the inclusion of the capsid from AAV serotype 5 in an AAV2/5 hybrid virus facilitates transduction of photoreceptor cells or various serotypes including AAV2/2, AAV8BP2, 7m8 and others efficiently transduce RGCs, typically post intravitreal administration (Ramachandran et al., 2016). Similarly, for example, peptides may be included in viral vectors to facilitate targeting. Synthetic non-viral vectors can be modified to include ligands to facilitate targeting of vectors to specific cell and/or tissue types, for example, folate can be conjugated to liposomes to target tumour cells which over express the folate receptor (Hattori and Maitani, 2005; Lu and Low, 2012).
[0078] In another embodiment of the invention, vectors are designed to optimize the generation and/or production of vector, for example, to optimise viral titre and/or to optimize the number or type of nucleotides incorporated into vector(s). For example, vector genomes may be modified such that large transgenes may be incorporated into vectors, for example, gutless adenovirus vectors have an increased capacity in terms of size than previous generations of adenovirus vectors. Components of vectors can be modified to optimize generation and production of vectors, for example, genes involved in replication of AAV can be modified to optimize replication and/or self complementary AAV vectors can be used to optimize rates of transgene expression. In an additional embodiment, vectors are designed to enable optimal expression of all components of a therapeutic. For example, where the vector is used to deliver two or more heterologous polynucleotide sequences, additional sequences can be included in the vector to optimize expression of each of the heterologous polynucleotide sequences. For example, vectors can include suppression and or replacement elements and or neurotrophic factor(s), among other nucleic acid components. For example where the vector is used to express two components, additional sequences can be included in the vector to optimize expression of both elements from a given vector. For example, inclusion of nucleotides to separate the ITRs of AAV and the nucleic acid component(s) can result in optimisation of expression of the components. Multiple nucleic acid components can be juxtaposed or separated from each other and/or can be in the same orientation or opposing orientations. Additional sequences, such as, for example, stuffer sequences can be included in vectors to optimize vector design. In addition, multiple nucleic acids components may be used in one vector. In addition vector design can include optimisation of codons to optimise levels of transgene expression, and/or achieve, modification of GC content, and/or removal of potential splice sites and/or other manipulations (Fischer et al., 2017).
TABLE-US-00014 TABLE 1 Exemplary Viral Vectors Delivery Method Serotype Reference AAV All serotypes, including but (Flannery et al., 1997; not limited to Lebkowski et al., 1988) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, Lentivirus (for example but VSV-G (Balaggan et al., 2006; Pang not exclusively Feline- Rabies-G et al., 2006; Takahashi, FIV, Equine-EIAV, Further serotypes** 2004) Bovine-BIV and Simian- SIV). Adenovirus Various (Bennett et al., 1996) Simian papovirius SV40 Various (Kimchi-Sarfaty et al., 2002) Semliki Forest Virus Various (DiCiommo et al., 2004) Sendai Virus Various (Ikeda et al., 2002)
[0079] The list provided is not exhaustive; other viral vectors and derivatives, natural or synthesized could be used in the invention.
TABLE-US-00015 TABLE 2 Exemplary Non-Viral Vectors or Delivery Methods Delivery Method Reference Cationic liposomes (Sakurai et al., 2001) HVJ liposomes (Hangai et al., 1998) Polyethylenimine (Liao and Yau, 2007) DNA nanoparticles (Farjo et al., 2006) Dendrimers (Marano et al., 2005) Bacterial (Brown and Giaccia, 1998) Macrophages (Griffiths et al., 2000) Stem cells (Hall et al., 2006) Retinal transplant (Ng et al., 2007) Marrow/Mesenchymal stromal cells (Chng et al., 2007; Kicic et al., 2003) Implant (e.g., Poly(imide)uncoated (Montezuma et al., 2006) or coated) Electroporation (Featherstone, 1993) Targeting peptides (for example but (Trompeter et al., 2003) not exclusively Tat) Lipid mediated (e.g., DOPE, PEG) (Zeng et al., 2007) (Amrite et al., 2006; Caplen et al., 1995) (Chalberg et al., 2005)
[0080] The list provided is not exhaustive. Other non-viral vectors and derivatives, natural or synthesized and other delivery methods could be used with the invention.
[0081] In an embodiment, the heterologous polynucleotide encodes mammalian Myocilin 7, Opa1, Ndi1, rhodopsin, peripherin or others, such as those associated with diseases listed in Table 3. In another embodiment, the heterologous polynucleotide encodes neurotrophic factors, anti-apoptotic agents and/or antioxidants, such as those listed in Table 4.
TABLE-US-00016 TABLE 3 Diseases with known retinal ganglion cell/optic nerve involvement. Disease Ocular symptoms/genes References Glaucoma Optic nerve excavation, (Weinreb et al., 2014) ganglion cell loss Multiple Sclerosis Recurrent optic neuritis (Chan, 2002) Neuroretinitis Transient inflammation of the (Purvin et al., 2011) optic nerve head. Devic's disease Inflammation and (Weinshenker and demyelination of optic nerve Wingerchuk, 2017) and spinal cord. Lupus Optic nerve inflammation, (Suri et al., 2016) treatable. Sarcoidosis Optic neuritis, progressive (Kidd et al., 2016) degeneration, optic nerve involvement; can be bilateral. Wegener's Optic nerve lesions. (Purvin and Kawasaki, Granulomatosis 2009; Takazawa et al., 2014) Optic nerve tumours Decreased visual function, (Miller, 2004) proptosis, optic disc swelling or pallor, and strabismus. Central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO), venous stasis retinopathy, optociliary shunt vessels, or rubeosis iridis with neovascular glaucoma. Grave's disease Autoimmune. Optic nerve (So et al., 2000) compression by extraocular muscles, progressive vision loss, treatable with early intervention. Anterior ischemic optic Ischemia leading to axon (Khalilpour et al., 2017) neuropathy degeneration and ganglion cell loss. Toxic optic neuropathy Optic nerve damage caused by (Grzybowski et al., 2015) toxic compounds (ethylene glycol, methanol, lead, tobacco and alcohol (tobacco-alcohol syndrome), insecticides, chloramphenicol. Vitainin deficiency (B12, Optic nerve pallor, scotoma, (Chavala et al., 2005) thiamine) progressive, painless vision loss. Ethambutol/Isoniazid Transient optic neuritis, can (Kass et al., 1957; Tsai and resolve upon cessation of Lee, 1997) treatment Amiodarone/Digitalis Progressive optic neuropathy (Passman et al., 2012) Leber's hereditary optic Retinal ganglion cell (Yu-Wai-Man et al., 2016) neuropathy degeneration; mitochondrial inheritance (for example, mutations in ND1, ND4, ND4L, ND6). Dominant optic Retinal ganglion cell (Kerrison et al., 1999; neuropathy degeneration; autosomal Reynier et al., 2004; Yu- dominant inheritance (for Wai-Man et al., 2016) example, mutations in OPA1, OPA3, OPA4, OPA5, OPA6, OPA8) X-linked or recessive optic Retinal ganglion cell (Katz et al., 2006; Lenaers neuropathy involvement (for example, et al., 2012) OPA2, OPA6 and OPA7 Friedreich's ataxia Optic nerve pallor, retinal (Fortuna et al., 2009; nerve fibre layer thinning. Noval et al., 2012) Mutations in FXN. Mohr-Tranebjaerg Deafness-dystonia-optic (Jin et al., 1996) syndrome neuronopathy (DDON) syndrome. Mutations in DPP/TIMM8 Charcot-Marie-Tooth Autosomal recessive disease, (Bombelli et al., 2014) disease caused primarily by MFN2. Optic atrophy seen as part of disease progression in some cases. Tay-Sachs Sphingolipidosis. Progressive (Chen et al., 2014) optic atrophy and retinal degeneration; autosomal recessive inheritance (mutations in HEXA). Niemann-Pick Sphingolipidosis. Progressive (Chen et al., 2014) lipid deposits leading to retinal ganglion cell degeneration; autosomal recessive inheritance (mutations in SMPD). Krabbe disease Sphingoipidosis. Psychosine (Chen et al., 2014) deposition leading to ganglion cell layer cell loss and thinning; autosomal recessive inheritance (mutations in GALC). Leigh syndrome/NARP Nerve fibre and ganglion cell (Hayashi et al., 2000) layer thinning, optic nerve atrophy; disease can be caused by multiple genes, with strong ocular involvement in MT- ATP6 mutation (mitochondrial). Behr syndrome Optic atrophy, spinocerebellar (Bonneau et al., 2014) degeneration. Can present as autosomal recessive or dominant (for example, OPA1, OPA3, C12ORF65). Wolfrum Syndrome Autosomal recessive disorder (Barrett et al., 1997; involving diabetes insipidus, Hoekel et al., 2014) diabetes mellitus, optic atrophy, and deafness (DIDMOAD) (for example, WFS1). Wolfrum Syndrome 2 involving optic atrophy, diabetes mellitus, deafness and decreased lifespan can be caused by mutations in the CISD2 gene. The list provided is not exhaustive.
TABLE-US-00017 TABLE 4 Exemplary neurotrophic factors, anti-apoptotic agents and antioxidants, which may be used in conjunction with the promoter described herein. These genes may be delivered at the same time as a therapeutic gene listed in Table 3 or at a different time, using the same vector or a different vector. Reference Neurotrophic factor NGF (Carmignoto et al., 1989) b-NGF (Lipps, 2002) NT-3 (Lu et al., 2011) NT4 (Bikbova et al., 2013) BDNF (Carmignoto et al., 1989; Di Polo et al., 1998) GDNF (Frasson et al., 1999; Gregory-Evans et al., 2009; Wu et al., 2004) NTN (Neurturin) (Koeberle and Ball, 2002) aFGF and bFGF (Akimoto et al., 1999; Faktorovich et al., 1990; Lau et al., 2000; McLaren and Inana, 1997; Uteza et al., 1999) LIF (Joly et al., 2008; Rhee and Yang, 2010) CNTF (Li et al., 2011; Sieving et al., 2006) Hepatocyte growth factor (Tnges et al., 2011) PDGF (Akiyama et al., 2006) VEGF (Trujillo et al., 2007) PEDF (Cayouette et al., 1999) RdCVF (Lveillard et al., 2004) Chondroitinase ABC (Liu et al., 2012) Erythropoietin (Rex et al., 2009; Rong et al., 2011; Sullivan et al., 2011) Suberythropoietc Epo (Wang et al., 2011) Anti-apoptotic agents Calpain inhibitor I (McKernan et al., 2007) Calpain inhibitor II (McKernan et al., 2007) Calpeptin (McKernan et al., 2007) PARP Norgestrel (Doonan et al., 2011) Antioxidant Vitamin C www.nei.nih.gov/amd Vitamin E www.nei.nih.gov/amd Beta-carotene www.nei.nih.gov/amd SOD2 +/ catalase (Doonan et al., 2009; Usui et al., 2009) Rosiglitazone (Doonan et al., 2009) Sestrin-1 (Budanov et al., 2004) PPAR (Aoun et al., 2003; Fan et al., 2008; Tomita et al., 2005; Zhao et al., 2006) Lutein (Li and Lo, 2010) The list provided is not exhaustive.
TABLE-US-00018 TABLE 5 Exemplary enhancer elements and epigenetic elements Reference Enhancer Element Chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter (Eguchi et al., 2007) transcription factor II Mouse dystrophin muscle promoter/enhancer (Anderson et al., 2006) Tobacco eIF4A-10 promoter elements (Tian et al., 2005) Immunoglobulin (Ig) enhancer element (Frezza et al., 2007) HS1,2A Col9a1 enhancer element (Genzer and Bridgewater, 2007) Gata2 intronic enhancer (Khandekar et al., 2007) TH promoter enhancer (Gao et al., 2007) CMV enhancer InvivoGen cat# pdrive- cag 05A13-SV Woodchuck hepatitis virus (Donello et al., 1998; posttranscriptional regulatory element Schambach et al., 2006) IRBP (Ying et al., 1998) CMV enhancer and chicken -actin InvivoGen cat# pdrive- promoter cag 05A13-SV CMV enhancer and chicken -actin InvivoGen cat# pdrive- promoter and 5UTR cag 05A13-SV CpG-island (Antoniou et al., 2003) Epigenetic elements Mcp Insulators (Kyrchanova et al., 2007) CpG-island region of the HNRPA2B1 (Williams et al., 2005) locus Chicken b-globin 5hypersensitive site 4 (Kwaks and Otte, 2006) (cHS4) Ubiquitous chromatin opening elements (Kwaks and Otte, 2006) (UCOEs) Matrix associated regions (MARs) (Kwaks and Otte, 2006) Stabilising and antirepressor elements (Kwaks and Otte, 2006) (STAR) Human growth hormone gene silencer (Trujillo et al., 2006) This list is not exhaustative
[0082] In an embodiment of the invention, the invention may be used to direct expression of heterologous polynucleotides to RGCs to provide transgene expression in these cells and/or to alleviate disease pathology. In another embodiment, the invention may be used to drive expression in RGCs, for example, to express a marker gene. The nucleic acid molecules, expression cassettes and vectors of the invention may thus be used in methods to identify a RGC. Kits comprising the isolated nucleic acid molecule according to the first aspect of the invention, the expression cassette according to the second aspect of the invention, or the vector according to the third aspect of the invention. This would enable, by inclusion of a marker gene in the kit, the identification of RGC cells for subsequent sorting or staining or isolation.
Cells
[0083] In another aspect, the invention provides cells comprising a promoter sequence of the first aspect of the invention, an expression cassette of the second aspect, or a vector of the third aspect for experimental or therapeutic use. In an embodiment, the cells express a suppressor such as antisense, and or RNAi that can target a gene expressed in RGCs. In another embodiment, the cells express a replacement nucleic acid. In another embodiment, the cells express a nucleic acid to augment expression of an endogenous gene and or to provide expression of a nucleic acid not normally expressed in that cell type. In another embodiment, the cells express a replacement nucleic acid that is not targeted by the suppressor. In an embodiment, the cells express a gene editing component such as CRISPR/Cas that can target a gene expressed in RGCs. In another embodiment, the cells comprise a vector encoding at least one or more suppression and or gene editing component(s). In another embodiment, the cells comprise a vector encoding one or more nucleic acids. In an additional embodiment, the cells comprise one or more vectors encoding suppression and or gene editing component(s) and or replacement nucleic acid(s).
[0084] In another aspect, the invention provides a transgenic animal comprising the isolated nucleic acid molecule according to the first aspect of the invention, the expression cassette according to the second aspect of the invention, the vector according to the third aspect of the invention, or the cell according the fourth aspect of the invention and its experimental or therapeutic use. In an embodiment, the transgenic animal is a model for Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy (LHON). In another embodiment, the transgenic animal is a model for dominant optic atrophy (DOA). In another embodiment, the transgenic animal is a model for glaucoma.
[0085] The isolated nucleic acid molecule according to the first aspect of the invention, the expression cassette according to the second aspect, or the vector of the third aspect of the invention can be administered to cells, tissues, and/or animals. Administration of the isolated nucleic acid molecule, the expression cassette, or the vector may be systemic or local. Administration of the isolated nucleic acid molecule, the expression cassette, or the vector may be used in conjunction with chemical and/or physical agents to aid administration. In a particular embodiment, the isolated nucleic acid molecule, the expression cassette, or the vector is for administration by intraocular (e.g., subretinal and/or intravitreal) injection. In the case of the retina, intravitreal injection can be used to administer a polynucleotide according to the following procedure. For example, mice can be anaesthetised by intraperitoneal injection of Domitor and Ketalar (10 and 50 g/g of body weight respectively). The pupils can be dilated with phenylephrine and under local analgesia (amethocaine) a small puncture is made in the sclera. A micro-needle attached to a 10 l syringe (Hamilton Company Europe) is inserted through the puncture to the vitreous and, for example, 1-3 l of vector can be administered into the vitreous. For example, in the case of AAV 1-3 l of a 10.sup.9-14 vp/ml AAV vector preparation in PBS is administered. A reverse anaesthetic (antisedan, 50 g/g of body weight) can be applied by intraperitoneal injection post-delivery. Body temperature during the procedure can be sustained using a homeothermic heating device. In addition newborn mice can be prepared for intravitreal injection according to Matsuda and Cepko or injected in utero according to Dejnenka et al. and Garcia-Frigola et al. (Dejneka et al., 2004; Garcia-Frigola et al., 2007; Matsuda and Cepko, 2004; Patricio et al., 2017).
[0086] In one embodiment of the invention administration of the isolated nucleic acid molecule, the expression cassette, and or the vector in combination with one or more factors to facilitate cell survival, cell viability and/or cell functioning is contemplated. In relation to neurons, a range of neurotrophic and/or neuroprotective factors may be used, including brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), glial dervived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), neurturin, ciliary derived neurotrophic factor (CNTF), nerve growth factor (NGF), fibroblast growth factors (FGF), insulin-like growth factors (IGF), pigment epithelium-derived factor (PEDG), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), thyrotrophin releasing hormone (TRH) and rod derived cone viability factor (RDCVF) amongst others (Feng et al., 2017; Igarashi et al., 2016; Kimura et al., 2016; Koeberle and Ball, 2002; Ortin-Martinez et al., 2014; Rathnasamy et al., 2017). There is substantial evidence in the literature that such factors may increase cell viability and/or cell survival for a range of cell types. For example, these factors have been shown to provide beneficial effects to a wide range of neuronal cell types including, for example, RGCs and or photoreceptors, when delivered either in protein or DNA forms (Buch et al., 2006; Cen et al., 2017; Feng et al., 2017). The use of GDNF to augment gene-based therapies for recessive disease has been demonstrated in mice (Buch et al., 2006; Feng et al., 2017). Genes encoding neurotrophic/neuroprotective factors may be expressed from general promoters such as the CBA promoter (Buch et al., 2006) or from tissue specific promoters such as the promoter sequence of the invention or promoter elements from genes detailed in Table 7 (and/or Table 3). Sequences to optimise expression of neurotrophic/neuroprotective factors such as those sequences identified in Table 4, may be included in constructs.
[0087] In one embodiment of the the isolated nucleic acid molecule, the expression cassette, and or the vector may be administered in combination with one or more factors to facilitate mitochondrial function including but not limited to Ndi1, Opa1, ND1, ND4, ND6, NDUAF6, and or AOX. In another embodiment administration of the isolated nucleic acid molecule, the expression cassette, and or the vector in combination with a corrected or optimised version of one or more of the genes causative of the disorders including but not limited to those listed in Table 3.
Evaluation of Expression of Heterologous or Endogenous Genes Using RNA Assays
[0088] Expression of heterologous polypeptides (genes of interest) and/or endogenous genes can be evaluated in cells, tissues and/or animals using RNA assays including real time RT-PCR, northern blotting, RNA in situ hybridisation and or RNAse protection assays. RNA expression levels of heterologous and/or endogenous nucleic acids can be assessed by real time RT-PCR using, for example, a Step-One Real Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif., USA) and using, for example, a QuantiTect SYBR Green RT-PCR kit (Qiagen Ltd). RT-PCR assays are undertaken using levels of expression of housekeeping controls such as -actin or GAPDH, for example, for comparative purposes. Levels of RNA expression can be evaluated using sets of primers targeting the nucleic acids of interest. For example, the following primers can be used for the evaluation of levels of expression of Thy1, gamma-synuclein, Ndi1, GDNF, Brn3a, Nefh, rhodopsin, channelopsins, EGFP, -actin, GAPDH, melanopsin, among others.
TABLE-US-00019 TABLE6 ExamplesofPCRPrimersformeasuringrhodopsin,-actin,GAPDH, Neth(twoprimerpairsgiven),gamma-synuclein,Brn3a,Thy1and Melanopsin Primer Sequence SEQIDNO RHOforwardprimer 5CTTTCCTGATCTGCTGGGTG3 SEQIDNO:25 RHOreverseprimer 5GGCAAAGAACGCTGGGATG3 SEQIDNO:26 EGFPforward 5TTCAAGAGGACGGCAACATCC3 SEQIDNO:27 primer EGFPreverseprimer 5CACCTTGATGCCGTTCTTTCGC3 SEQIDNO:28 -actinforward 5TCACCCACACTGTGCCCATCTACGA3 SEQIDNO:29 primer -actinreverse 5CAGCGGAACCGCTCATTGCCAATGG3 SEQIDNO:30 primer GAPDHforward 5-CAGCCTCAAGATCATCAGCA-3 SEQIDNO:31 primer: GAPDHreverse 5-CATGAGTCCTTCCACGATAC-3 SEQIDNO:32 primer: Nefhforwardprimer 5-TGGCCCTGGACATTGAGATT-3 SEQIDNO:33 1: Nefhreverseprimer 5-TGCGTGGATATGGAGGGAAT-3 SEQIDNO:34 1: Nefhforwardprimer 5-ACCGTCATCAGGCAGACATT-3 SEQIDNO:35 2: Nefhreverseprimer 5-AATGTCCAGGGCCATCTTGA-3 SEQIDNO:25 2: Gammasynuclein 5-TCTCCATTGCCAAGGAAGGT-3 SEQIDNO:26 forwardprimer: Gammasynuclein 5-CTTGTTGGCCACTGTGTTGA-3 SEQIDNO:27 reverseprimer: Brn3aforward 5-CGCAGCGTGAGAAAATGAAC-3 SEQIDNO:28 primer: Bm3areverse 5-TGGCAGAGAATTTCATCCGC-3 SEQIDNO:29 primer: Thy1forward 5-TGAACCAAAACCTTCGCCTG-3 SEQIDNO:30 primer: Thy1reverseprimer: 5-AGCTCACAAAAGTAGTCGCC-3 SEQIDNO:31 Melanopsinforward 5-GGGTTCTGAGAGTGAAGTGG-3 SEQIDNO:32 primer: Melanopsinreverse 5-AAGAGGCCTTGAGTTCTCC-3 SEQIDNO:33 primer:
[0089] Expression of heterologous or endogenous genes may be confirmed, for example, by Northern blotting or real time RT qPCR. Real time RT PCR may be performed using standard methodologies such as those described in O'Reilly et al., 2007 and using primers such as amongst others those listed in Table 6.
[0090] RNA may also be detected by in situ hybridisations using single stranded RNA probes that have been labelled with, for example, DIG. To evaluate levels of expression of heterologous genes or endogenous genes, RNase protections assays can be performed using art known methods, such as that described in the Ambion mirVana Probe and Marker kit manual and the Ambion RPAIII Ribonuclease protection assay kit manual, as described (Chadderton et al., 2009; O'Reilly et al., 2007). For example, RNA probes approximately 15-25 nucleotides in length specific for transcripts from, for example, a heterologous gene can be synthesized.
[0091] Expression of heterologous genes and/or endogenous genes can be undertaken and determined in cells, in tissues and or in animals using, for example, the assays and associated methodologies provided above.
Evaluation of Expression of Heterologous and Endogenous Genes Using Protein Assays
[0092] Expression of heterologous genes and/or endogenous genes can be evaluated in cells, tissues and/or animals using protein assays including ELISA, western blotting and immunocytochemistry assays. ELISAs can be undertaken to evaluate levels of expression of a target endogenous genesuch proteins assays are well know in the art and methods are provided in, for example Palfi et al. (2006). For example, in the case of retinal genes such as the rhodopsin gene, ELISA is undertaken using a rhodopsin primary antibody which is typically used in a diluted form, for example, using a 1/10-1/10000 dilution (but possibly outside of this range) of an antibody for the target protein. Antibodies including Thy1, Ndi1, including others, can be used to evaluate levels of endogenous and/or heterologous genes expressed in RGCs. In addition, Western Blotting may be undertaken to determine relative quantities of a specific protein, for example GDNF, Ndi1, Thy1 and others. Briefly, protein samples are separated using SDS-PAGE and transferred to a membrane. The membrane is incubated with generic protein (for example milk proteins) to bind to sticky places on the membrane. A primary antibody is added to a solution which is able to bind to its specific protein and a secondary antibody-enzyme conjugate, which recognises the primary antibody is added to find locations where the primary antibody bound.
[0093] In addition to the protein assays referred to above, assays using antibodies in conjunction with microscopy can be used to evaluate protein levels. For example, in the case of Brn3a, GABA, EGFP, or rhodopsin immunocytochemistry (for example, using a 1/10-1:1000 dilution of a primary antibody) and fluorescent microscopy can be carried out as has been documented, and in
Delivery of Heterologous or Endogenous Polynucleotides
[0094] Both non-viral and/or viral vectors can be used in the invention to deliver the heterologous and/or endogenous polynucleotides of interest in expression cassettes of the second aspect of the invention. For example, in the case of retina, recombinant adenoassociated virus (AAV) and more specifically AAV2/2 may be used to elicit efficient preferential transduction of RGCs. Other AAV serotypes may also be used to deliver to retina, for example, AAV2/2 elicits efficient delivery to the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), as does AAV4. AAV vectors can be generated using protocols with and without helper virus. For example, a helper virus free protocol using a triple transfection approach is well documented (Xiao et al., 1998). Expression cassettes can be cloned into plasmids such as pAAV-MCS provided by Stratagene Inc. Transgenes can be cloned between the inverted terminal repeats of AAV2 and transfected into 293 cells (Agilent; ATCC cat no CRL-1573) with two other plasmids, hence the term triple transfection. For example, the pRep2/Cap2 plasmid (Agilent) together with the pHelper plasmid (Agilent), at, for example, a ratio of 1:1:2, can be used to generate AAV2/2 vectors. Virus can be generated using a variety of art known procedures including the method outlined below. For example, to generate virus fifty 150 mm plates of confluent HEK293 cells were transfected (50 g DNA/plate) with polyethyleminine (Reed et al., 2006). 48 hrs post-transfection crude viral lysates were cleared (Auricchio et al., 2001) and purified by CsCl.sub.2 gradient centrifugation (Zolotukhin et al., 1999). The AAV containing fraction was dialysed against PBS. Genomic titres, viral particles (vp/ml), were determined by quantitative real-time PCR using art known methods (Rohr et al., 2002).
Assay for Function
[0095] To evaluate if administration of a heterologous and/or augmentation of an endogenous gene using an expression cassette or a vector of the invention modulates the function of a target tissue and/or cell type, one or more assays may be employed that are well described in the prior art. In the case of the retina, functional assays include but are not limited to electrophysiological assays including the full-field electroretinogram (ERG) and the pattern electroretinogram (PERG) and psychophysical assays such as visual field assessment, both kinetic and static, colour vision testing, and pupillometry. Protocols for ERG and PERG recording in humans have been established by the International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision (ISCEV) and may be adapted for similar recording in animals. The full-field ERG can be performed using, for example, the following procedure or an adapted procedure. Animals are dark-adapted overnight and prepared for ERG under dim red light. Pupils are dilated with 1% cyclopentalate and 2.5% phenylephrine. Animals are anesthetized with ketamine and xylazine (16 and 1.6 g/10 g body weight respectively) injected intraperitoneally. Standardized flashes of light are presented to the animal, for example a mouse, in a Ganzfeld bowl. ERG responses are recorded simultaneously from both eyes by means of contact lens, gold wire or saline impregnated cotton thread electrodes, amongst others, using 1% amethocaine as topical anaesthesia. Reference and ground electrodes are positioned subcutaneously, approximately one mm from the temporal canthus and anterior to the tail respectively. Responses are analysed using appropriate recording equipment. Rod-isolated responses are recorded using a dim white flash (25 dB maximal intensity where maximal flash intensity was 3 candelas/m.sup.2/s) presented in the dark-adapted state. Maximal combined rod-cone responses to the maximal intensity flash are then recorded. Following a 10 minute light adaptation to a background illumination of 30 candelas/m.sup.2, cone-isolated responses are recorded to the maximal intensity flash presented initially as a single flash and subsequently as 30 Hz flickers in humans or 10 Hz in mice. A-waves are measured from the baseline to the trough and b-waves from the baseline (in the case of rod-isolated responses) or from the a-wave to the trough. The amplitude as well as the timing of the waveforms can provide valuable on both rod and cone photoreceptor function. The photopic electroretinogram negative response (PhNR), a component that follows the b-wave peak of the photopic full-field ERG, is thought to be correlated with inner retinal activity, particularly RGC activity, and is selectively reduced in optic neuropathies. The Visual Evoked Potential (VEP) assesses the transmission of electrical signals, predominantly generated by the macula, to the visual cortex. This response is, in fact, measured by electrodes placed over the occipital visual cortex, the exciting stimulus being either checkerboard pattern stimuli or flash stimuli. The amplitude of the signal correlates with the number of healthy retinal cells contributing to the signal of the signal while the efficiency of transmission along the optic nerve pathway may assays by determination of the latency of the signal, delay indicating pathological disturbance of transmission.
Optokinetics
[0096] OKR spatial frequency thresholds are typically measured blind by two independent researchers using a virtual optokinetic system (VOS, OptoMotry, Cerebral Mechanics, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada) as described (Prusky et al., 2004). OptoMotry measures the threshold of the mouse's optokinetic tracking response to moving gratings. Briefly, a virtual-reality chamber is created with four 17-inch computer monitors facing into a square and the unrestrained mouse placed on a platform in the centre. A video camera, situated above the animal, provides real-time video feedback. The experimenter centres the virtual drum on the mouse's head and judges whether the mouse makes slow tracking movements with its head and neck. The spatial frequency threshold, the point at which the mouse no longer tracks, is obtained by incrementally increasing the spatial frequency of the grating at 100% contrast. A staircase procedure is used in which the step size is halved after each reversal, and terminated when the step size becomes smaller than the hardware resolution (0.003c/d, 0.2% contrast). One staircase is presented for each direction of rotation to measure each eye separately, with the two staircases being interspersed.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
[0097] Optic nerve integrity in experimental and control mice can be assessed by MEMRI (Bearer et al., 2007; Lin and Koretsky, 1997; Lindsey et al., 2007; Watanabe et al., 2001) using a 7-T Bruker Biospec 70/30 magnet (Bruker Biospin, Etlingen, Germany). MEMRI demarcates active regions of the brain due to the ability of Mn.sup.2+ ions to enter excitable cells through voltage-gated calcium channels. Thus analysis of Mn.sup.2+ transport through the optic nerve provides a good measure of its integrity. Two hours before scanning, mice are anaesthetised and intravitreally injected, as described (Chadderton et al., 2012), with 2 ml of 20 mg/ml manganese chloride (MnCl.sub.2) in phosphate buffered saline (PBS). Log signal intensities from MRI scans corresponding to the region immediately superior to the optic chiasm can be quantified using the Image J software (Abrmoff et al., 2004) (http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/). Assays that may be used to assess transgene expression and functional effects are not limited to the assays detailed above.
[0098] The agents of the invention (e.g. isolated nucleic acids, expression cassettes and/or vectors) may be administered in effective amounts. An effective amount is a dosage of the agent sufficient to provide expression of the transgene and or a medically desirable result. An effective amount means that amount necessary to delay the onset of, inhibit the progression of or halt altogether the onset or progression of the particular condition or disease being treated and/or provide expression of a marker or molecular tool. An effective amount may be an amount that reduces one or more signs or symptoms of the disease. When administered to a subject, effective amounts will depend of course on the particular condition being treated; the severity of the condition; individual patient parameters including age, physical condition, size and weight, concurrent treatment, frequency of treatment, and the mode of administration. These factors are well known to those of ordinary skill in the art and can be addressed with no more than routine experimentation.
[0099] Actual dosage levels of active ingredients in the compositions of the invention can be varied to obtain an amount of the agent(s) that is effective to achieve the desired therapeutic response for a particular patient, composition, and mode of administration. The selected dosage level depends upon the activity of the particular agent, the route of administration, the severity of the condition being treated, the condition, and prior medical history of the patient being treated. However, it is within the skill of the art to start doses of the agent(s) at levels lower than required to achieve the desired therapeutic effort and to gradually increase the dosage until the desired effect is achieved.
[0100] Practice of the invention will be still more fully understood from the following examples, which are presented herein for illustration only and should not be construed as limiting the invention in any way.
EXEMPLIFICATION
[0101] To help illustrate the current invention, five constructs were generated using different conserved regions of murine Nefh or human NEFH upstream sequence to drive EGFP marker gene expression (
Example 1
In Silico RGC Promoter Analyses
[0102] Human genes whose relative expression was enriched in the RGC layer by over 10-fold compared to relative expression in OR were selected (Kim et al., 2006). Genes were assessed based on GCL expression level (EL.sub.GCL) compared to the OR expression (EL.sub.OR), termed the enrichment factor (EF=EL.sub.GCL/EL.sub.OR; Kim et al., 2006) and the 15 genes with the highest ELs were selected for further investigation. A gene score (GS=EL.sub.GCLEF) was used to rank genes for suitability as potential promoters. Further analysis was performed on mouse genomic data, as a mouse promoter was the desired output. Data from the UCSC genome browser (mm10 mouse mammalian conservation track; UCSC; Kent et al., 2002) were used to establish conservation upstream of the transcriptional start site of candidate genes; results from analysis of 2.5 kb upstream of the start site are presented (
Cloning and AAV Production pAAV.CMV-EGFP was cloned as described (Palfi et al., 2010). To generate pAAV.Nefh-EGFP, a 2251 bp fragment of mouse Nefh upstream sequence (NM_010904.3) was amplified from genomic DNA and substituted for the CMV promoter in pAAV.CMV-EGFP. To create pAAV.minNefh-EGFP a 838 bp fragment encompassing the six highly conserved regions of Nefh/was synthesized by Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT) and substituted for the CMV promoter in pAAV.CMV-EGFP. pAAV.NEFH-EGFP was generated by amplifying 1.9 kb fragment of human genomic DNA (NM_021076.3) using the following primers: Forward primer: 5 AGATCATCTTAAGACGCGTTGCTGTCAGCTGCTTGTGA 3 (SEQ ID NO: 45) and Reverse primer: 5GAGGTACAGTGTTCTCCTAAC 3+ (SEQ ID NO: 46). The purified PCR product was cloned into pcDNA3.1+ (Invitrogen) along with a fragment of custom synthesized DNA obtained from GeneWiz in their standard vector (pUC57-Amp; see below). The full length NEFH, 2501 bp, was excised and cloned in place of the CMV promoter in pAAV-CMV-EGFP to create pAAV-NEFH-EGFP (SEQ ID NO: 47).
TABLE-US-00020 AGTTTCCTGAGCGCTCTCCAAGTGGGTCCTCTAGATGTTAGGAGAACA CTGTACCTCCCCCGGTCAGGGGTCTCCTGTCTCCGTTCTATGGAGCGT CCATGCTCCCATTCAGGACTGCCTTGCTCCCTCCTCTGTTCCGGGGCT GGCTGCACAGTCTCTGCACCCCCTATCCTGAAAGCCTCTCTTAACTAT TTGGAAAGCCTCGTGTCCTGTCTCATACAGGGATCCCCTCATCCTAAT GACTGCAATCTTCCATTGCTCCATCCCGAGGGCATCCTGCCCCTATTC CCATCAGGTTTCTCCTTGTCCTCTCCCTGTTTCAAGTCCCCTTTCTTA TTCCGAACACACTCGCAGGCTCTTCCGACGCGCACCCGGGGGTCCTCA CTGGCCCACTCCGGGAGTCCTCTGCCCGCTTCCCCGACCTCGAGGGTC TCCTCTGACGCAGCGTCGATTCCCCTTCCCTCCTCGGTCCCCTGCCCC GCCCCTCTCACTGCGGCGGAGCCGGTCGGCCGGGGGGCCGCAGGGGAG GAGGCGGAGAGGGCGGGGCCCTCCTCCCCACCCTCTCACTGCCAAGGG GTTGGACCCGGCCGCGGCGGCTATAAAAGGGCCGGCGCCCTGGTGCTG CCGCAGTGCCTCCCGCCCCGTCCCGGCCTCGCGCACCTGCTCAGCGAT ATCCTAGGAATTCAGCTTCTAGA
[0103] To create pAAV.A-EGFP, conserved region A was amplified from human genomic DNA using the following primers: Forward: 5-ATCGATGACGCGTCTCTGACGCAGCGTCGATT-3 (SEQ ID NO: 48); and Reverse: 5-AGATCATGATATCGGCCTGAGCAGGTGCGCGA-3 (SEQ ID NO: 49) and cloned upstream of EGFP in pAAV-MCS-EGFP (Agilent Technologies) was digested with MluI and EcoRV and purified. To generate pAAV.A+F-EGFP, the following sequence was custom synthesized by GeneWiz and cloned into pAAV.CMV-EGFP in place of CMV (SEQ ID NO: 50):
TABLE-US-00021 AGAGATCATACGCGTCTAGTCATCTCAGTTGCTGTCAGCTGCTTGTGA GCCTTCTCACATCCAGAGAATGTATCAGCATTGTGCAGACTGAAAAGA CCCAGAGGAACAAGGCTCCAATGGCAAAATTCCAAGTAGAATGACAAA TAAATGGGGAGCCATCTGAGAGCAAGGGAGTCCTGCCCAACACCCGCC CCATGCCTTTCTCAGGGACCTCAGACCAGCCACTCACCTCCATCCTCC CAGCACCACCTGCAACCAGCCCCTTGCCCTCTGCAAACTGGAGCACGA CTGGATCTTTAGATGGGGGAAAAATGCTTCATCATGTTCTGCTGCTTC ATGCAAAACCAGAAACTCCCTCCCCCTCTTCCCTCCTCCCAGCGCACT CTCCTTCCAGTAAGTTTAAACTTCCCTCCTCGGTCCCCTGCCCCGCCC CTCTCACTGCGGCGGAGCCGGTCGGCCGGGGGGCCGCAGGGGAGGAGG CGGAGAGGGCGGGGCCCTCCTCCCCACCCTCTCACTGCCAAGGGGTTG GACCCGGCCGCGGCGGCTATAAAAGGGCCGGCGCCCTGGTGCTGCCGC AGTGCCTCCCGCCCCGTCCCGGCCTCGCGCACCTGCTCTCACGTGATC AGAGATATCTCAGACA
[0104] pAAV.A-spacer-F-EGFP was generated by amplifying a 1866 bp section of lambda DNA using the following primers (Forward primer: 5-ATCGATGTTTAAACTACTACCGATTCCGCCTAGT-3 (SEQ ID NO: 51) and Reverse primer: 5-ATGCATGTTTAAACAGGCATTTATACTCCGCTGG-3) (SEQ ID NO: 52) and cloning this between conserved regions A and F in pAAV.A+F-EGFP. All plasmid constructs were verified by Sanger sequencing. Recombinant AAV2/2 viruses, AAV.NEFH-EGFP AAV.Nefh-EGFP, AAV.CMV-EGFP, AAV.minNefh-EGFP, AAV.A-EGFP, AAV.A+F-EGFP and AAV.A-spacer-F-EGFP were generated, and genomic titres determined, as described (O'Reilly et al., 2007).
Animals and Intravitreal Injections
[0105] Wild type 129 S2/SvHsd mice (Harlan UK Ltd, Oxfordshire, UK) were maintained in a specific pathogen free (SPF) facility. Intravitreal injections were undertaken in strict compliance with the European Communities Regulations 2002 and 2005 (Cruelty to Animals Act) and the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) statement for the use of animals. Adult mice were anaesthetised and pupils dilated as described (O'Reilly et al., 2007). Using topical anaesthesia (Amethocaine), a small puncture was made in the sclera. A 34-gauge blunt-ended microneedle attached to a 10 l Hamilton syringe was inserted through the puncture, and 3 l AAV2/2 was slowly, over a two-minute period, administered into the vitreous. Following intravitreal injection, an anesthetic reversing agent (100 mg/10 g body weight; Atipamezole Hydrochloride) was delivered by intraperitoneal injection. Body temperature was maintained using a homeothermic heating device. Animals were sacrificed by CO.sub.2 asphyxiation.
Histology
[0106] Histology was performed as described (Chadderton et al., 2012) with some modifications. Briefly, transduced eyes (n=6) were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and cryosectioned (12 m). Sections were co-labeled for EGFP (chicken anti-GFP; Abcam, ab13970, 1/2000 dilution; Palfi et al., 2012) and either Brn3a (goat anti-Brn3a; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-31984, 1/200 dilution; Nadal-Nicolas et al., 2009; Trost et al., 2015), ChAT (goat anti-choline acetyltransferase; Millipore, AB144P, 1/500 dilution; Zhu et al., 2014) or GABA (rabbit anti-GABA; Sigma, A2052, 1/2000 dilution; Zhu et al., 2014) using immunohistochemistry. EGFP was labeled with FITC-conjugated secondary antibody (1/400 dilution, Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories) while Brn3a, ChAT and GABA were labeled with Cy3-conjugated secondary antibody (1/400 dilution, Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories). Cell nuclei were counterstained with 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). Background labeling was determined using parallel processed sections where the primary antibodies were omitted. Corresponding microscope images were taken using a Zeiss Axiophot fluorescent microscope (Carl Zeiss Ltd., Welwyn Garden City, UK). Immunohistochemical signals obtained with different filters were overlaid using Photoshop v.13 (Adobe Systems Europe, Glasgow, UK). For analysis, levels for each channel were set to predetermined values to help discrimination between signal and background; signal levels above threshold were taken as positive. Additionally, cellular colocalisation of the positive immunohistochemical signals with the nuclear label was a criterion for identification of positive cells. However, it is possible that at the low spectrum identification of either positive or negative cells failed. This would have implicated a small percentage of cells and affected all groups similarly, and therefore should not have any significant effects on the results. Labeled and co-labeled cells were counted manually using the count tool in Photoshop. Two transduced sections (approximately 300 m apart) from the central part of the retina (1500 m span in total) were analysed for each marker (n=4-5). Statistical analysis (one way ANOVA, Tukey's multiple comparison post-hoc test) was performed using Prism 5 (GraphPad); p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Flow Cytometry Cell Sorting
[0107] Retinas were harvested three weeks post-injection and trypsin-dissociated, as previously described (Palfi et al., 2012). To isolate RGCs, cells were labeled with anti-Thy1-PE-Cy5, (CD90.2, Rat Thy-1.2, 53-2.1 1:100; eBioscience Inc., San Diego, Calif.). DRAQ5 (BioStatus, Leicestershire, UK). Nucleated, DRAQ5-positive cell populations were initially sorted on the basis of forward and side scatter, and subsequently two stages of singlet selection. Retinal cells expressing both EGFP and Thy-1 were identified (BD FACSAria IIIu high speed cell sorter, BD Bioscience, San Jose, Calif.). EGFP had been excited by a 488 nm laser and the emission was collected using a 530/30 band pass filter. Thy-1 PECy5 had been measured exciting the probe with a 561 nm laser and collecting the signal with a 690/40 nm band pass. QC of the cell sorter had been done with BD CS&T beads and the drop delay had been adjusted using the BD Accudrop beads (RUO), following manufacture specifications. EGFP-positive cells expressing Thy-1 were represented as a percentage of the total EGFP positive cells. Data was reanalyzed with the FCSExpress 6 Flow software (DeNovo Software). Statistical analysis (Student's t-test) was performed using Microsoft Excel and p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RT-QPCR of FACS Sorted Thy-1 Positive Cells
[0108] Thy1-positive cells collected from n=12 retinas and non-labelled retinal cells with a similar forward and side scatter from n=9 retinas were collected by flow cytometry cell sorting and total RNA was extracted as described (Millington-Ward et al., 2011). Thy1 mRNA was amplified in triplicate from pooled sorted populations by flow cytometry using the QuantiTect SYBR green RT-PCR kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) using the manufacturer's protocol and the following primers:
TABLE-US-00022 F (SEQIDNO:30) 5TGAACCAAAACCTTCGCCTG3 R (SEQIDNO:31) 5AGCTCACAAAAGTAGTCGCC3
[0109] Resulting CT values were standardised to cell number, as standardly used housekeeping genes could be expressed at different levels in different cell populations, making them unreliable for this analysis.
RNA Extraction and PCR Analysis
[0110] Adult wild type mice (n=5 or 6 eyes) were intravitrally injected with 6.610.sup.8 vp AAV-A-EGFP, AAV-A+F-EGFP, AAVA-spacer-F-EGFP, AAVEGFP or AAV-Nefh-EGFP. Retinas were harvested three or four weeks post-injection and total RNA extracted as described (Millington-Ward et al., 2011). In vivo expression levels of EGFP was determined by reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) on a StepOne Real Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif., USA) using a QuantiTect SYBR Green RT-PCR kit (Qiagen Ltd., Crawley, UK). The EGFP primers used were: EGFP forward primer 5 TTCAAGAGGACGGCAACATCC 3 (SEQ ID NO: 27, Table 6) and EGFP reverse primer: 5 CACCTTGATGCCGTTCTTTCGC 3 (SEQ ID NO: 28, Table 6). RT-PCRs were performed twice in triplicate. Expression levels were normalized using the internal housekeeping gene -actin. Standard curves of -actin were generated by serially diluting RNA 5. Standard curves of EGFP were generated by serially diluting plasmid DNA containing an EGFP gene 10. A minimum of 4 points were used in all standard curves.
Results
[0111] The objective of the current study was the characterisation and in vivo evaluation of an RGC promoter for future use in AAV-mediated gene therapies. A comparative evaluation of genes with highly enriched RGC expression was undertaken in silico and the lead candidate was investigated in vivo (
TABLE-US-00023 TABLE 7 List of putative ganglion cell promoters. Human transcriptomic data of 1,000 cell populations from RGCs versus OR (Kim et al. 2006) was used to determine relative expression levels in the outer retina (EL.sub.OR) and the GCL (EL.sub.GCL). Enrichment factor (EF) for the GCL was calculated as EF = EL.sub.GCL/EL.sub.OR. A gene score (GS) was calculated as GS = (EL.sub.GCL EF) to provide an overall score. Genes are listed in order of GS. Rank Gene name EL.sub.GCL EL.sub.R EF GS 1 NEFH 21899.1 89.4 245 5.37 10.sup.6 2 NEFM 6984.1 31.7 220.6 1.54 10.sup.6 3 NEFL 7841.1 50.5 155.3 1.22 10.sup.6 4 VSNL1 4659.33 67.35 69.18 3.22 10.sup.5 5 SPARCL1 5077 149.75 33.9 1.72 10.sup.5 6 SLC17A6 1302.9 10.3 126.8 1.65 10.sup.5 7 TMSB10 7124.3 324.6 21.9 1.56 10.sup.5 8 ANXA2 2221.4 37.5 59.3 1.32 10.sup.5 9 STMN2 4139.9 147.9 28 1.16 10.sup.5 10 PRPH1 1238.5 18.4 67.5 8.36 10.sup.4 11 CRTAC1 4478.6 347 12.9 5.78 10.sup.4 12 RBPMS 832.5 12.6 66 5.49 10.sup.4 13 RAB13 1802.7 59.7 30.2 5.44 10.sup.4 14 ATP1B1 3803.3 299.2 12.7 4.83 10.sup.4 15 FABP3 1054.6 24.9 42.4 4.47 10.sup.4
[0112] Following analysis, Nefh was deemed to be the most highly enriched gene in RGCs with an enrichment factor (EF) of 245-fold, as well as demonstrating an extremely high EL.sub.GCL (21899.1; Table 7). Some of the mouse genes analysed showed greater average conservation in their 2.5 kb upstream regions than Nefh (Nefm 0.289, Stmn2 0.292, Crtacl 0.349 vs. Nefh 0.185). However, due to their lower EF and EL.sub.GCL scores, Nefh was deemed likely to drive higher levels of RGC-specific expression and hence to be a better candidate promoter (GS: Nefh 5.3710.sup.6 vs. Nefm 1.5410.sup.6, Stmn2 1.1610.sup.6, Crtacl 5.7810.sup.4). Tmsb10, Nefl, and Sparcl1 had lower scores than Nefh in all categories. Brn3a, a commonly used marker for RGCs (Kim et al., 2006; Nadal-Nicolas et al., 2014), was found to have an extremely high conservation within a 2.5 kb upstream region, and a high EF (0.576, 79.1 respectively). However, its EL.sub.GCL was found to be approximately 39 times lower than that of Nefh (719.7), and so was not included as a candidate gene. The hSYN gene showed no significant GCL enrichment or expression in the Kim et al (2006) study.
[0113] To explore the strength and specificity of the putative Nefh promoter, 2251 bp of upstream sequence from the mouse homologue was used to drive expression of an EGFP reporter gene in an AAV2/2 vector (AAV-Nefh-EGFP) and expression compared to that mediated by the CMV promoter (AAV-CMV-EGFP; Palfi et al., 2010, Chadderton et al., 2012). The mouse gene was chosen to ensure that function or non-function was not due to species incompatibility. The CMV promoter incorporated into AAV vectors has previously been shown to drive high levels of transgene expression in a wide variety of retinal cell types (Lebherz et al., 2008; Li et al., 2008; Mueller and Flotte, 2008), including RGCs (Chadderton et al., 2012; Tshilenge et al., 2016) and was used as a control vector for transgene expression.
[0114] Adult mice were injected intravitreally with 310.sup.9 viral genomes (vg)/eye AAV.CMV-EGFP or with either 310.sup.9 vg/eye or 910.sup.9 vg/eye AAV.Nefh-EGFP. Histological analysis 12 weeks post-injection revealed widespread EGFP expression in the retina (
[0115] Approximately fifty percent of cells in the GCL are RGCs with the other fifty percent being displaced amacrine cells (Akopian et al., 2016; Jeon et al., 1998; webvision.med.utah.edu). To further delineate the expression profile of the Nefh promoter, EGFP transgene expression was analysed in the GCL using antibodies targeting Brn3a, an RGC marker (Schlamp et al., 2013) and two amacrine cell markers, ChAT and GABA (Jeon et al., 1998; Wassle et al., 1987; webvision.med.utah.edu). Brn3a staining was used to explore the specificity of the Nefh promoter for RGCs; 50%-55% of all cells in the GCL were Brn3a positive in line with previously published data (
[0116] As a second method of assessing preferential gene expression in RGCs from the Nefh promoter, adult wildtype mice were intravitreally injected with 910.sup.9 vg/eye AAV.Nefh-EGFP or 310.sup.9 vg/eye AAV.CMV-EGFP. Three weeks post injection, retinas were taken, cells dissociated and analysed by FACS and EGFP-positive cells assessed for Thy1 expression. Interestingly levels of Thy1 enrichment in these populations were significantly higher in AAV.Nefh-EGFP versus AAV.CMV-EGFP transduced retinal samples (5.4-fold, n=12 versus only 1.6-fold, n=9 respectively; p<0.005). These data support the immunohistochemical observations above. Notably, Thy1 mRNA levels were found to be 3.23-fold higher in Thy1-positive cells than in non-antibody labeled retinal cells with a similar forward and sideways scatter (CT values of 32.618 and 33.477 respectively), indicating that the Thy1 antibody enriches for RGCs (
[0117] To further explore the preferential gene expression in RGCs from the Nefh promoter, adult wildtype mice were subretinally injected with 310.sup.9 vg/eye AAV.Nefh-EGFP or AAV.CMV-EGFP and EGFP expression evaluated. The AAV2 serotype efficiently transduces RGCs; however, prior studies have shown that it will not transduce photoreceptors when injected intravitreally. As such, it was necessary to confirm an absence of transgene expression in photoreceptors when AAV.Nefh-EGFP was administered subretinally (
[0118] Given the potential demonstrated by 2251 bp of upstream sequence of the Nefh gene to preferentially transduce RGCs in the murine experiments above, it was important to evaluate the putative promoter region from NEFH. 2501 bp of upstream sequence from the human gene was used to drive expression of an EGFP reporter gene in an AAV2/2 vector (AAV-NEFH-EGFP) and expression compared to that mediated by the murine Nefh promoter (AAV-Nefh-EGFP;
[0119] Similarly EGFP RNA expression levels from AAV-Nefh-EGFP and AAV-NEFH-EGFP were compared in wild type mice. Mice were injected intravitreally with 6.610.sup.8 vp of either vectors and retinas taken 3 weeks post-injection. EGFP RNA levels expressed from both vectors did not differ significantly and in this in vivo study were shown to be functionally equivalent (
[0120] To further explore the individually defined elements of the putative NEFH promoter a series of constructs were generated (
[0121] The constructs evaluated expressed EGFP at varying levels, with AAV.Nefh-EGFP expressing significantly more highly than any of the other constructs (p<0.05;
DISCUSSION
[0122] AAV has become one of the commonly used vectors for gene therapy, with many clinical trials ongoing or completed and a number of gene therapies approved or seeking approval (clinicaltrials.gov). AAV is the dominant vector for use in ocular gene therapies (Bainbridge et al., 2015; Bennett et al., 2016; Feuer et al., 2016; Ghazi et al., 2016; Hauswirth et al., 2008; MacLaren et al., 2014; clinicaltrials.gov), and research in recent years has focused on improving the efficiency of AAV transduction and expression in the retina. The development of AAV vectors such as AAV7m8 and AAV8BP2 has improved levels of transduction in a wide variety of retinal cell types, and enabled consideration of intravitreal administration as a potential route of access for many retinal cells including photoreceptors (Cronin et al., 2014; Dalkara et al., 2013; Ramachandran et al., 2016). Various tyrosine capsid mutations in AAV have the potential to increase transgene expression levels by modulating capsid phosphorylation and ubiquitin proteasome-based degradation of viral particles during intracellular trafficking (Mao et al., 2016; Mowat et al., 2014; Petrs-Silva et al., 2009). Recent approaches to intravitreal delivery, including vitrectomy and sub-inner limiting membrane (sub-ILM) blebbing, have the potential to improve expression levels further (Boye et al., 2010; Tshilenge et al., 2016). However, a consequence of more efficient and broad transduction profiles may be greater potential for off-target effects. Confining expression of a gene therapy to only those cells affected by a disease represents a rational strategy; the potential reduction in immune responses may be an advantageous safety feature, as well as a means of aiding long-term expression.
[0123] In the current study, we have developed an approach to identify putative RGC promoters by analysing retinal transcriptomic data and referencing it against mammalian sequence conservation datasets to infer potential function. The expression levels of retinal genes were analysed, with high GCL enrichment and high absolute expression levels prioritised. Gene expression data in RGCs from the gene expression omnibus (GEO; ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo) was analysed in detail. Studies on expression from pre-natal or immature retina were omitted. In addition, samples where photoreceptor cell-specific gene expression was found to be high in RGCs were excluded as this indicated sample impurity. In contrast to the data from Kim et al. (2006), and taking the above into account, no studies in the database suitably provided data on RGC gene expression enrichment in adult retina.
[0124] Conservation of the upstream sequence of these genes was evaluated in this context in order to establish lead candidate promoter sequences. Using this approach, we identified a number of potential promoters for use in RGCs. We proceeded to evaluate in vivo one of these, Nefh, a putative promoter sequence that showed significant conservation between species, high retina expression and RGC enrichment and that was of a suitable size for use in AAV-mediated gene delivery vectors. We established that the Nefh upstream sequence efficiently drives expression in RGCs following intravitreal injection of AAV.Nefh-EGFP.
[0125] Following intravitreal delivery of either AAV.Nefh-EGFP or AAV.CMV-EGFP, EGFP expression patterns were compared by histology. Serotype AAV2/2 was chosen both for its efficient transduction of mouse RGCs, as well as its use and tolerance in the human eye, as has been observed in several clinical trials (Bennett et al., 2016; Busskamp et al., 2010; Ghazi et al., 2016; Koilkonda et al., 2014; MacLaren et al., 2014; Sengupta et al., 2016; Yang et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2009). Both the Nefh and CMV promoters drove effective expression of EGFP in the GCL (
[0126] Fifty percent of the GCL is composed of amacrine cells (Akopian et al., 2016; Jeon et al., 1998; webvision.med.utah.edu). Analysis of EGFP expression in Brn3a-negative cells, as well as in GABA-positive or ChAT-positive amacrine cells, two major types of amacrine cells in the mouse GCL, demonstrated that AAV.Nefh-EGFP resulted in transgene expression in significantly fewer amacrine cells compared to AAV.CMV-EGFP. While expression from the Nefh promoter was significantly restricted to ChAT-positive amacrine cells in the GCL compared to the CMV promoter, expression from both promoters were similar for GABA expressing amacrine cells in the GCL. This further highlights the relative specificity of the Nefh promoter sequence in targeting RGCs, and underlines its potential use for gene delivery to RGCs and its value for future gene therapies directed towards the retinal GCL. Of note, no significant difference was found between the numbers of transduced RGCs between the two doses of AAV.Nefh-EGFP. Previous studies have shown that only 40-60% of cells in the GCL are actually RGCs (Schlamp et al., 2013; Xiang et al., 1996); it may be that saturation of RGC transduction is being reached even at the lower AAV.Nefh-EGFP dose.
[0127] RGCs represent a heterogeneous population thought to comprise in the region of 30 discrete types, which together represent just approximately 1% of cells in the retina (Baden et al. 2016). This has made isolation of pure populations of RGCs highly challenging within the field. Methods that have traditionally been used to enrich for RGC, commonly using the Thy1 antibody, have included immunopanning (Barres et al., 1988; Welsbie et al., 2017), density gradient centrifugation (Kornguth et al., 1981), and magnetic cell separation (Shoge et al., 1999). More recently flow cytometry based methods with the Thy1.2 antibody have been used for RGC enrichment (Chintalapudi et al., 2016). These studies have highlighted that while the Thy1 antibody does indeed enrich for RGCs it does not exclusively label these cells, indicating that RGC-isolation methodologies still require optimisation. In the current study we used Thy1.2-based flow cytometry to support the data from immunohistochemistry. Similar to other studies, we found that the antibody did not exclusively isolate RGCs, based on the percentage of Thy1-positive cells. However, in addition we confirmed at the RNA level that Thy1 was enriched in our cell-sorted population. We found the enrichment of Thy1-positive cells within the EGFP-positive cell population to be greater in AAV.Nefh-EGFP versus AAV. CMV-EGFP treated retinal cell samples confirming the histological data, indicating preferential gene expression in RGCs with the Nefh promoter.
[0128] To expand the potential of the identified Nefh promoter to future human studies we also tested 2501 bp of the putative promoter region upstream of NEFH and demonstrated comparable levels of both expression and specificity in the mouse retina (
[0129] The purpose of this study was two-fold, involving identification of candidate RGC promoters for potential use in AAV-mediated gene therapies, and moreover the validation of the utilised methodology for characterisation of putative promoter sequences (
[0130] Intravitreal injection represents a route of vector administration that enables efficient transduction of RGCs. RGCs are the primary target cell population for gene therapies for many disorders including Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy (LHON), dominant optic atrophy (DOA), glaucoma and the retinal endophenotypes that are a feature of many neurodegenerative disorders, such as multiple sclerosis (Farrar et al., 2013). While intravitreal administration provides access to RGCs, it may more readily result in stimulating immune response(s) to vectors such as AAV compared to subretinal administration (Li et al., 2008). It would therefore be valuable to minimise the therapeutic vector dose, and to confine transgene expression to the target cells of interest, thereby limiting undesired side effects.
[0131] Furthermore, observations regarding patterns of cellular loss in end stage photoreceptor degenerations have highlighted the retention of certain retinal layers. While frequently the photoreceptor layer degenerates, many other retinal cells remain relatively intact, including bipolar, amacrine, horizontal and RGCs. These observations have been elegantly juxtaposed with the identification of light sensitive molecules from organisms such as algae and archaebacteria. Optogenetics is the expression of these molecules, provided as a gene therapy or protein, in non-light sensitive neurons thereby introducing a capacity for light detection. RGCs represent one key target cell population for optogenetics (Farrar et al., 2014; Gaub et al., 2014), and hence the NEFH promoter characterised in the current study, in principle, may also be of value in the design of future optogenetic-based gene therapies for IRDs. The above highlights the potential utility of the NEFH promoter sequence identified in the current study providing preferential transgene expression in RGCs in the design of future gene therapies for many disorders involving RGCs.
TABLE-US-00024 TABLE 8 List of animal sequences used for conservation alignment. A placental mammal species alignment (phastConsElements60wayEuarchontoGlires) was used for the conservation alignment seen in FIG. 2. Species are grouped as Glires, Primates, and other placental mammals, with species names, sequence assembly dates, and assembly details listed. Assembly Animal Species Date Assembly Name/details Mouse Mus musculus December GRCm38/mm10 reference 2011 Guinea Cavia porcellus February Broad/cavPor3 Syntenic pig 2008 net Kangaroo Dipodomys ordii July 2008 Broad/dipOrd1 Reciprocal rat best Naked Heterocephalus January Broad mole-rat glaber 2012 HetGla_female_1.0/ hetGla2 Syntenic net Pika Ochotona July 2008 Broad/ochPri2 Reciprocal princeps best Rabbit Oryctolagus April 2009 Broad/oryCun2 Syntenic cuniculus net Rat Rattus norvegicus March RGSC 5.0/m5 Syntenic net princeps 2012 Squirrel Spermophilus November Broad/speTri2 Syntenic net tridecemlineatus 2011 Tree Tupaia belangeri December Broad/tupBel1 Reciprocal shrew 2006 best Marmoset Callithrix jacchus March WUGSC 3.2/calJac3 2009 Syntenic net Gorilla Gorilla gorilla May 2011 gorGor3 Syntenic net Human Homo sapiens February GRCh37/hg19 Syntenic net 2009 Mouse Microcebus June 2003 Broad/micMur1 Reciprocal lemur murinus best Gibbon Nomascus June 2011 GGSC Nleu1.1/nomLeu2 leucogenys Syntenic net Bushbaby Otolemur March Broad/otoGar3 Syntenic net garnettii 2011 Chimp Pan troglodytes February Pan_troglodytes- 2011 2.1.4/panTro4 Syntenic net Baboon Papio hamadryas November Baylor 1.0/papHam1 2008 Reciprocal best Orangutan Pongo pygmaeus July 2007 WUGSC 2.0.2/ponAbe2 abelii Syntenic net Chinese Macaca mulatta October BGI CR_1.0/rheMac3 rhesus 2010 Syntenic net Squirrel Saimiri October saiBol1 Syntenic net monkey boliviensis 2011 Tarsier Tarsius syrichta August Broad/tarSyr1 Reciprocal 2008 best Panda Ailuropoda December BGI-Shenzhen 1.0/ailMel1 melanoleuca 2009 Syntenic Net Cow Bos taurus October Baylor Btau_4.6.1/bosTau7 2011 Syntenic Net Dog Canis lupus September Broad/canFam3 Syntenic familiaris 2011 net Sloth Choloepus July 2008 Broad//choHof1 Reciprocal hoffmanni best Armadillo Dasypus December Armadillo/dasNov3 novemcinctus 2011 Reciprocal best Tenrec Echinops telfairi July 2005 Broad/echTel1 Reciprocal best Horse Equus caballus September Broad/equCab2 Syntenic 2007 net Hedgehog Erinaceus June 2006 Broad/eriEur1 Reciprocal europaeus best Cat Felis catus September ISGSC Felis_catus 2011 6.2/felCat5 Reciprocal best Elephant Loxodonta July 2009 Broad/loxAfr3 Syntenic net africana Microbat Myotis lucifugus July 2010 Broad/myoLuc2 Reciprocal best Sheep Ovis aries February ISGC/oviAri1 Reciprocal 2010 best Rock Procavia July 2008 Broad/proCap1 Reciprocal hyrax capensis best Megabat Pteropus July 2008 Broad/pteVam1 Reciprocal vampyrus best Shrew Sorex araneus June 2006 Broad/sorAra1 Reciprocal best Pig Sus scrofa August SGSC Sscrofa10.2/susScr3 2011 Syntenic net Manatee Trichechus October Broad v1.0/triMan1 manatus 2011 Syntenic net latirostris Dolphin Tursiops October Baylor Ttru_1.4/turTru2 truncatus 2011 Reciprocal best Alpaca Vicugna pacos July 2008 Broad/vicPac1 Reciprocal best
[0132] All documents referred to in this specification are herein incorporated by reference. Various modifications and variations to the described embodiments of the inventions will be apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the invention. Although the invention has been described in connection with specific preferred embodiments, it should be understood that the invention as claimed should not be unduly limited to such specific embodiments. Indeed, various modifications of the described modes of carrying out the invention which are obvious to those skilled in the art are intended to be covered by the present invention.
REFERENCES
[0133] Abrmoff, M. D. et al. (2004). J. Biophotonics Int. 11, 36-41. doi:10.1117/1.3589100. [0134] Akimoto, M. et al. (1999). Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 40, 273-279. [0135] Akiyama, H. et al. (2006). J. Cell. Physiol. 207, 407-412. doi:10.1002/jcp.20583. [0136] Akopian, A. et al. (2016). J. Comp. Neurol. doi:10.1002/cne.24074. [0137] Ali, I. et al. (2016). Neurosci. Lett. 634, 32-41. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2016.10.001. [0138] Amrite, A. C. et al. (2006). Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 47, 1149-1160. doi:10.1167/iovs.05-0531. [0139] Anderson, C. L. et al. (2006). Mol. Ther. 14, 724-734. doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2006.04.013. [0140] Antoniou, M. et al. (2003). Genomics 82, 269-279. doi:10.1016/S0888-7543(03)00107-1. [0141] Aoun, P. et al. (2003). Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 44, 2999-3004. doi:10.1167/iovs.02-1060. [0142] Auricchio, A. et al. (2001). Mol. Ther. 4, 372-374. doi:10.1006/mthe.2001.0462. [0143] Baden, T. et al. (2016). Nature 529, 345-350. doi:10.1038/nature16468. [0144] Bainbridge, J. W. B. et al. (2015). N. Engl. J. Med. 372, 1887-97. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1414221. [0145] Bainbridge, J. W. B. et al. (2008). N. Engl. J. Med. 358, 2231-39. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0802268. [0146] Balaggan, K. S. et al. (2006). J. Gene Med. 8, 275-285. doi:10.1002/jgm.845. [0147] Barres, B. A. et al. (1988). Neuron 1, 791-803. doi:10.1016/0896-6273(88)90127-4. [0148] Barrett, T. G. et al. (1997). Eye 11, 882-888. doi:10.1038/eye.1997.226. [0149] Bearer, E. L. et al. (2007). Neuroimage 37. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.04.053. [0150] Bennett, J. et al. (1996). Nat. Med. 2, 649-654. [0151] Bennett, J. et al. (2016). Lancet 388, 661-672. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30371-3. [0152] Bennett, J. et al. (1998). Gene Ther. 5, 1156-64. doi:10.1038/sj.gt.3300733. [0153] Bessant, D. A. R. et al. (2001). Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 11, 307-316. doi:10.1016/50959-437X(00)00195-7. [0154] Bikbova, G. et al. (2013). Brain Res. 1534, 33-45. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2013.08.027. [0155] Bombelli, F. et al. (2014). JAMA Neurol. 71, 1036-42. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.629. [0156] Bonneau, D. et al. (2014). Brain 137. doi:10.1093/brain/awu184. [0157] Boye, S. E. et al. (2016). Hum. Gene Ther. 27, 580-597. doi:10.1089/hum.2016.085. [0158] Boye, S. E. et al. (2010). PLoS One 5. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011306. [0159] Brown, J. M. et al. (1998). Cancer Res. 58, 1408-1416. doi:9537241. [0160] Buch, P. K. et al. (2006). Mol. Ther. 14, 700-709. doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2006.05.019. [0161] Budanov, A. V et al. (2004). Science 304, 596-600. doi:10.1126/science.1095569. [0162] Busskamp, V. et al. (2010). Science (80-.). 329, 413-417. doi:10.1126/science.1190897. [0163] Callaway, E. M. (2005). J. Physiol. 566, 13-9. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2005.088047. [0164] Caplen, N. et al. (1995). Gene Ther. 29, 603-13. [0165] Carmignoto, G. et al. (1989). J Neurosci 9, 1263-1272. Available at: [0166] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2467970. [0167] Cayouette, M. et al. (1999). Neurobiol. Dis. 6, 523-32. doi:10.1006/nbdi.1999.0263. [0168] Cen, L. P. et al. (2017). Neuroscience 343, 472-482. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.12.027. [0169] Chadderton, N. et al. (2009). Mol. Ther. 17, 593-599. doi:10.1038/mt.2008.301. [0170] Chadderton, N. et al. (2012). Eur. J. Hum. Genet., 62-68. doi:10.1038/ejhg.2012.112. [0171] Chalberg, T. W. et al. (2005). Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 46, 2140-2146. doi:10.1167/iovs.04-1252. [0172] Chan, J. W. (2002). Ocul. Immunol. Inflamm. 10, 161-186. doi:10.1076/ocii.10.3.161.15603. [0173] Chavala, S. H. et al. (2005). Eur. J. Intern. Med. 16, 447-448. doi:10.1016/j.ejim.2005.01.021. [0174] Chen, H. et al. (2014). Surv. Ophthalmol. 59, 64-76. doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2013.02.005. [0175] Chintalapudi, S. R. et al. (2016). Front. Aging Neurosci. 8. doi:10.3389/fnagi.2016.00093. [0176] Chng, K. et al. (2007). J. Gene Med. 9, 22-32. doi:10.1002/jgm.990. [0177] Choi, V. W. et al. (2015). Mol. Ther. Methods Clin. Dev. 2, 15022. doi:10.1038/mtm.2015.22. [0178] Choudhury, S. et al. (2016). Front. Neurosci. 10, 551. doi:10.3389/fnins 2016.00551. [0179] Cronin, T. et al. (2014). EMBO Mol. Med. 6, 1-16. doi:10.15252/emmm.201404077. [0180] Dalkara, D. et al. (2013). Sci. Transl. Med. 5, 189ra76. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3005708. [0181] Daly, C. et al. (2016). Histone deacetylase: Therapeutic targets in retinal degeneration. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-17121-0_61. [0182] Dejneka, N. S. et al. (2004). Mol. Ther. 9, 182-188. doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2003.11.013. [0183] Di Polo, A. et al. (1998). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 95, 3978-83. doi:10.1073/pnas.95.7.3978. [0184] DiCiommo, D. P. et al. (2004). Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 45, 3320-3329. doi:10.1167/iovs.04-0140. [0185] Diester, I. et al. (2011). Nat. Neurosci. 14, 387-397. doi:10.1038/nn.2749. [0186] Donello, J. E. et al. (1998). J. Virol. 72, 5085-92. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9573279%5Cnhttp://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=PMC110072. [0187] Dong, J. Y. et al. (1996). Hum. Gene Ther. 7, 2101-2112. doi:10.1089/hum.1996.7.17-2101. [0188] Doonan, F. et al. (2011). J. Neurochem. 118, 915-927. doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.2011.07354.x. [0189] Doonan, F. et al. (2009). J. Neurochem. 109, 631-643. doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.05995.x. [0190] Eguchi, T. et al. (2007). Biochimie 89, 278-288. doi:10.1016/j.biochi.2006.12.006. [0191] Faktorovich, E. G. et al. (1990). Nature 347, 83-6. doi:10.1038/347083a0. [0192] Fan, Y. et al. (2008). Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 28, 315-21. doi:10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.149815. [0193] Farjo, R. et al. (2006). PLoS One 1. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000038. [0194] Farrar, G. J. et al. (2013). Trends Genet. 29, 488-497. doi:10.1016/j.tig.2013.05.005. [0195] Farrar, G. J. et al. (2014). Vis. Neurosci. 31, 289-307. doi:10.1017/50952523814000133. [0196] Featherstone, C. (1993). Am Biotechnol Lab 11. [0197] Feng, L. et al. (2017). eNeuro 4. doi:10.1523/ENEURO.0331-16.2016. [0198] Feuer, W. J. et al. (2015). Ophthalmology, 1-13. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.10.025. [0199] Fischer, M. D. et al. (2017). Mol. Ther. doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.05.005. [0200] Flannery, J. G. et al. (1997). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 94, 6916-6921. doi:10.1073/pnas.94.13.6916. [0201] Fortuna, F. et al. (2009). Brain 132, 116-123. doi:10.1093/brain/awn269. [0202] Frasson, M. et al. (1999). Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 40, 2724-2734. [0203] Frezza, D. et al. (2007). Ann. . . . 66, 1210-5. doi:10.1136/ard.2006.066597. [0204] Gao, Q. et al. (2007). Brain Res. 1130, 1-16. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.10.018. [0205] Garcia-Frigola, C. et al. (2007). BMC Dev. Biol. 7, 103. doi:10.1186/1471-213X-7-103. [0206] Gaub, B. M. et al. (2014). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 111, E5574-83. doi:10.1073/pnas.1414162111. [0207] Genzer, M. A. et al. (2007). Nucleic Acids Res. 35, 1178-1186. doi:10.1093/nar/gkm014. [0208] Ghazi, N. G. et al. (2016). Hum. Genet. 135, 327-343. doi:10.1007/s00439-016-1637-y. [0209] Gregory-Evans, K. et al. (2009). Mol. Vis. 15, 962-973. [0210] Grieger, J. C. et al. (2005). J. Virol. 79, 9933-44. doi:10.11283VI.79.15.9933-9944.2005. [0211] Griffiths, L. et al. (2000). Gene Ther. 7, 255-62. doi:10.1038/sj.gt.3301058. [0212] Grzybowski, A. et al. (2015). Acta Ophthalmol. 93, 402-410. doi:10.1111/aos.12515. [0213] Hall, K. M. et al. (2006). Exp. Hematol. 34, 433-442. doi:10.1016/j.exphem.2005.12.014. [0214] Hangai, M. et al. (1998). Arch. Ophthalmol. 116, 342-8. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9514488. [0215] Hattori, Y. et al. (2005). Curr. Drug Deliv. 2, 243-252. doi:10.2174/1567201054368002. [0216] Hauswirth, W. W. et al. (2008). Hum. Gene Ther. 19, 979-90. doi:10.1089/hum.2008.107. [0217] Hayashi, N. et al. (2000). Ophthalmology 107, 1397-1402. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(00)00110-X. [0218] Hoekel, J. et al. (2014). J. AAPOS 18, 461-465.el. doi:10.1016/j.jaapos.2014.07.162. [0219] Igarashi, T. et al. (2016). Mol. Vis. 22, 816-26. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27440998%5Cnhttp://www.pubmedcentral.nih.go v/articlerender.fcgi?artid=PMC4947967. [0220] Ikeda, Y. et al. (2002). Exp. Eye Res. 75, 39-48. doi:10.1006/exer.2002.1177. [0221] Ivanova, E. et al. (2010). Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 51, 5288-5296. doi:10.1167/iovs.10-5389. [0222] Jeon, C. J. et al. (1998). J Neurosci 18, 8936-8946. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9786999. [0223] Jin, H. et al. (1996). Nat Genet. 14, 353-6. doi:10.1038/ng0496-417. [0224] Joly, S. et al. (2008). J. Neurosci. 28, 13765-13774. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5114-08.2008. [0225] Ju, J. et al. (2015). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 16, 5666-5681. doi:10.3390/ijms16035666. [0226] Karmali, P. P. et al. (2007). Med. Res. Rev. 27, 696-722. doi:10.1002/med.20090. [0227] Kass, I. et al. (1957). JAMA, 1740-1743. [0228] Katz, B. J. et al. (2006). Am. J. Med. Genet. Part A 140, 2207-2211. doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.31455. [0229] Kay, C. N. et al. (2013). PLoS One 8. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0062097. [0230] Kent, W. J. et al. (2002). Genome Res. 12, 996-1006. doi:10.1101/gr.229102. [0231] Kerrison, J. B. et al. (1999). Arch Ophthalmol 117, 805-810. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10369594. [0232] Khalilpour, S. et al. (2017). J. Neurol. Sci. 375, 430-441. doi:10.1016/j.jns.2016.12.044. [0233] Khandekar, M. et al. (2007). Development 134, 1703-1712. doi:10.1242/dev.001297. [0234] Khani, S. C. et al. (2007). Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 48, 3954-3961. doi:10.1167/iovs.07-0257. [0235] Kiang, A. S. et al. (2005). Mol. Ther. 12, 555-561. doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2005.03.028. [0236] Kicic, A., et al. (2003). J. Neurosci. 23, 7742-7749. doi:23/21/7742 [pii]. [0237] Kidd, D. P. (2016). Neurol. Neuroimmunol. neuroinflammation 3, e270. doi:10.1212/NXI.0000000000000270. [0238] Kim, C. Y. (2006). Mol. Vis. 12, 1640-8. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17200664. [0239] Kimchi-Sarfaty, C. et al. (2002). Hum. Gene Ther. 13, 299-310. doi:10.1089/10430340252769815. [0240] Kimura, A. et al. (2016). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 17. doi:10.3390/ijms17091584. [0241] Koeberle, P. D. et al. (2002). Neuroscience 110, 555-567. doi:S0306452201005577 [pii]. [0242] Koilkonda, R. D. et al. (2010). Arch. Ophthalmol. (Chicago, Ill. 1960) 128, 876-83. doi:10.1001/archophthalmol.2010.135. [0243] Koilkonda, R. D. et al. (2014). JAMA Ophthalmol. 33136, 409-420. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.7630. [0244] Kornguth, S. et al. (1981). Neurosci. Lett. 27, 151-157. doi:10.1016/0304-3940(81)90260-3. [0245] Kgler, S. et al. (2003a). Gene Ther. 10, 337-347. doi:10.1038/sj.gt.3301905. [0246] Kgler, S. et al. (2003b). Virology 311, 89-95. doi:10.1016/S0042-6822(03)00162-4. [0247] Kwaks, T. H. J. et al. (2006). Trends Biotechnol. 24, 137-142. doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2006.01.007. [0248] Kyrchanova, O. et al. (2007). Mol. Cell. Biol. 27, 3035-43. doi:10.1128/MCB.02203-06. [0249] Lau, D. et al. (2000). Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 41, 3622-3633. [0250] Lebherz, C. et al. (2008). J. Gene Med. 10, 375-382. doi:10.1002/jgm.1126. [0251] Lebkowski, J. S. et al. (1988). Mol. Cell. Biol. 8, 3988-3996. doi:10.1128/MCB.8.10.3988. [0252] Lee, J. et al. (2016). Theranostics 6, 192-203. doi:10.7150/thno.13657. [0253] Lenaers, G. et al. (2012). Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 7, 46. doi:10.1186/1750-1172-7-46. [0254] Lveillard, T. et al. (2004). Nat. Genet. 36, 755-9. doi:10.1038/ng1386. [0255] Li, Q., Miller et al. (2008). Mol. Vis. 14, 1760-9. Available at: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2559816&tool=pmcentrez& rendertype=abstract. [0256] Li, R. et al. (2011). PLoS One 6. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0023148. [0257] Li, S. Y. et al. (2010). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 11, 2109-2117. doi:10.3390/ijms11052109. [0258] Liao, H. W. et al. (2007). Biotechniques 76, 211-220. doi:10.1007/s11103-011-9767-z.Plastid. [0259] Lin, Y.-J. et al. (1997). Magn. Reson. Med. 38, 378-388. doi:10.1002/mrm.1910380305. [0260] Lindsey, J. D. et al. (2007). Neuroimage 34, 1619-1626. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.07.048. [0261] Lipps, B. V (2002). J. Nat. Toxins 11, 57-62. Available at: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0036007738&partnerID=40&md5=8dc2cb02db919b0223f2d3ab98d27e5d. [0262] Liu, T., et al. (2006). Cancer Treat Rev 32, 157-165. doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2005.12.006. [0263] Liu, T. et al. (2012). J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 100 A, 236-242. doi:10.1002/jbm.a.33271. [0264] Lopez, A. J. et al. (2016). J. Neurosci. 36, 3588-3599. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3682-15.2016. [0265] Lu, H.-X. et al. (2011). Med. Sci. Monit. 17, BR305-311. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22085792. [0266] Lu, Y. et al. (2012). Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 64, 342-352. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.09.020. [0267] MacLaren, R. E. et al. (2014). Lancet 383, 1129-1137. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62117-0. [0268] Mao, Y. et al. (2016). BMC Biotechnol. 16, 1. doi:10.1186/s12896-015-0230-0. [0269] Marano, R. J. et al. (2005). Gene Ther. 12, 1544-50. doi:10.1038/sj.gt.3302579. [0270] Masland, R. H. (2012). Neuron 76, 266-280. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.10.002. [0271] Matsuda, T., et al. (2004). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 101, 16-22. doi:10.1073/pnas.2235688100. [0272] McKernan, D. P. et al. (2007). Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 48, 5420-5430. doi:10.1167/iovs.07-0287. [0273] McLaren, M. J. et al. (1997). FEBS Lett. 412, 21-29. doi:10.1016/50014-5793(97)00566-8. [0274] McNally, N. et al. (2002). Hum. Mol. Genet. 11, 1005-16. doi:10.1093/hmg/11.9.1005. [0275] Miller, N. R. (2004). Eye (Loud). 18, 1026-37. doi:10.1038/sj.eye.6701592. [0276] Millington-Ward, S. et al. (2011). Mol. Ther. 19, 642-649. doi:10.1038/mt.2010.293. [0277] Molday, L. L. et al. (2013). Hum. Mol. Genet. 22, 3894-3905. doi:10.1093/hmg/ddt244. [0278] Montezuma, S. R. et al. (2006). Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 47, 3514-3522. doi:10.1167/iovs.06-0106. [0279] Mowat, F. M. et al. (2014). Gene Ther. 21, 96-105. doi:10.1038/gt.2013.64. [0280] Mueller, C. et al. (2008). Gene Ther. 15, 858-63. doi:10.1038/gt.2008.68. [0281] Nadal-Nicols, F. M. et al. (2009). Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 50, 3860-3868. doi:10.1167/iovs.08-3267. [0282] Nadal-Nicols, F. M. et al. (2014). Front. Neuroanat. 8, 99. doi:10.3389/fnana.2014.00099. [0283] Ng, T. F. et al. (2007). Chem. Immunol. Allergy 92, 300-316. doi:10.1159/000099280. [0284] Noval, S. et al. (2012). Eye 26, 315-320. doi:10.1038/eye.2011.291. [0285] O'Reilly, M. et al. (2007). Am. J. Hum. Genet. 81, 127-135. doi:10.1086/519025. [0286] Ortin-Martinez, A. et al. (2014). PLoS One 9. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0113798. [0287] Palfi, A. et al. (2006). Hum. Mutat. 27, 260-268. doi:10.1002/humu.20287. [0288] Palfi, A. et al. (2012). Hum. Gene Ther. 23, 847-858. doi:10.1089/hum.2011.142. [0289] Palfi, A. et al. (2015). Mol. Ther. Methods Clin. Dev. 2, 15016. doi:10.1038/mtm.2015.16. [0290] Palfi, A. et al. (2010). Hum. Gene Ther. 21, 311-323. doi:10.1089/hum.2009.119. [0291] Pang, C. P. et al. (2006). Mol. Vis. 12, 85-92. doi:v12/a9 [pii]. [0292] Passman, R. S. et al. (2012). Am. J. Med. 125, 447-453. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.09.020. [0293] Patricio, M. I. et al. (2017)Mol. Ther.Nucleic Acids 6, 198-208. doi:10.1016/j.omtn.2016.12.006. [0294] Petrs-Silva, H. et al. (2009). Mol. Ther. 17, 463-471. doi:10.1038/mt.2008.269. [0295] Prusky, G. T. et al. (2004). Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 45, 4611-4616. doi:10.1167/iovs.04-0541. [0296] Purvin, V., et al. (2009). Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 37, 712-717. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9071.2009.02122.x. [0297] Purvin, V. et al. (2011). J. Neuro-Ophthalmology 31, 58-68. doi:10.1097/WNO.0b013e31820cf78a. [0298] Ramachandran, P. et al. (2016). Hum. Gene Ther., hum.2016.111. doi:10.1089/hum.2016.111. [0299] Rathnasamy, G. et al. (2017). Mol. Neurobiol. 54, 3453-3464. doi:10.1007/s12035-016-9905-3. [0300] Reed, S. E. et al. (2006). J. Virol. Methods 138, 85-98. doi:10.1016/j.jviromet.2006.07.024. [0301] Rex, T. S. et al. (2009). Exp. Eye Res. 89, 735-740. doi:10.1016/j.exer.2009.06.017. [0302] Reynier, P. et al. (2004). J. Med. Genet. 41, e110. doi:10.1136/jmg.2003.016576. [0303] Rhee, K. Do et al. (2010). Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, 647-654. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1399-9_74. [0304] Rohr, U.-P. et al. (2002). J. Virol. Methods 106, 81-8. doi:10.1016/50166-0934(02)00138-6. [0305] Rong, X. et al. (2011). Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 43, 334-42. doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2011.05.011. [0306] Russell, S. et al. (2017). Lancet 6736, 1-12. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31868-8. [0307] Sakurai, F. et al. (2001). Gene Ther. 8, 677-86. doi:10.1038/sj.gt.3301460. [0308] Schambach, A. et al. (2006). Gene Ther. 13, 641-645. doi:10.1038/sj.gt.3302698. [0309] Schlamp, C. L. et al. (2013). Mol. Vis. 19, 1387-96. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23825918%5Cnhttp://www.pubmedcentral.nih.go v/articlerender.fcgi?artid=PMC3695759. [0310] Sengupta, A. et al. (2016). EMBO Mol. Med. 8, 1248-1264. doi:10.15252/emmm 201505699. [0311] Shoge, K. et al. (1999). Neurosci. Lett. 259, 111-114. [0312] Sieving, P. A. et al. (2006). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 103, 3896-901. doi:10.1073/pnas.0600236103. [0313] So, N. M. et al. (2000). Acta Radiol. 41, 559-61. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11092475. [0314] Spanopoulou, E. et al. (1991). Mol. Cell. Biol. 11, 2216-28. doi:10.1128/MCB.11.4.2216.Updated. [0315] Struebing, F. L. et al. (2016). Front. Genet. 7, 1-14. doi:10.3389/fgene.2016.00169. [0316] Sullivan, T. A. et al. (2011). Hum. Gene Ther. 22, 1191-1200. doi:10.1089/hum.2011.052. [0317] Sun, X., et al. (2010). Gene Ther. 17, 117-31. doi:10.1038/gt.2009.104. [0318] Suri, D. et al. (2016). Lupus 25, 93-96. doi:10.1177/0961203315603142. [0319] Takahashi, M. (2004). Methods Mol Biol 246, 439-449. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Cita tion&list_uids=14970609. [0320] Takazawa, T. et al. (2014). Orbit 33, 13-6. doi:10.3109/01676830.2013.841716. [0321] Tian, L. et al. (2005). J. Plant Physiol. 162, 1355-1366. doi:10.1016/j.jplph.2005.03.011. [0322] Tomita, H. et al. (2005). Cardiovasc. Res. 67, 134-41. doi:10.1016/j.cardiores.2005.02.022. [0323] Tnges, L. et al. (2011). J. Neurochem. 117, 892-903. doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.2011.07257.x. [0324] Trompeter, H.-I. I. et al. (2003). J. Immunol. Methods 274, 245-256. doi:10.1016/50022-1759(02)00431-3. [0325] Trost, A. et al. (2015). Exp. Eye Res. 136, 59-71. doi:10.1016/j.exer.2015.05.010. [0326] Trujillo, C. A. et al. (2007). Clin. Ophthalmol. 1, 393-402. Available at: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2704523&tool=pmcentrez& rendertype=abstract. [0327] Trujillo, M. A. et al. (2006). Mol. Endocrinol. 20, 2559-75. doi:10.1210/me.2006-0147. [0328] TSAI, R. et al. (1997). J. Ocul. Pharmacol. Ther. 13, 473-477. Available at: http://online.liebertpub.com/doi/abs/10.1089/jop.1997.13.473. [0329] Tshilenge, K.-T. et al. (2016). Hum. Gene Ther. Methods 27, 122-134. doi:10.1089/hgtb.2016.034. [0330] Usui, S. et al. (2009). Mol. Ther. 17, 778-86. doi:10.1038/mt.2009.47. [0331] Uteza, Y. et al. (1999). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 96, 3126-3131. doi:10.1073/pnas.96.6.3126. [0332] Ververis, K., et al. (2013). Biol. Targets Ther. 7, 47-60. doi:10.2147/BTT.S29965. [0333] Wang, Q. et al. (2011). Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 27, 769-782. doi:10.1159/000330085. [0334] Wssle, H. J. Comp. Neurol. 265, 391-408. doi:10.1002/cne.902650308. [0335] Wassmer, S. J. et al. (2017). Sci. Rep. 7, 45329. doi:10.1038/srep45329. [0336] Watanabe, T. et al. (2001). Magn. Reson. Med. 46, 424-429. doi:10.1002/mrm.1209. [0337] Weinreb, R. N. et al. (2014). JAMA 311, 1901-11. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.3192. [0338] Weinshenker, B. G. et al. (2017). Mayo Clin. Proc. 92, 663-679. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.12.014. [0339] Welsbie, D. S. et al. (2017). Neuron 94, 1142-1154.e6. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2017.06.008. [0340] Wert, K. J. et al. (2013). Hum. Mol. Genet. 22, 558-567. doi:10.1093/hmg/dds466. [0341] Williams, S. et al. (2005). BMC Biotechnol. 5, 17. doi:10.1186/1472-6750-5-17. [0342] Wu, W.-C. et al. (2004). Mol. Vis. 10, 93-102. doi:v10/a13 [pii]. [0343] Xiang, M. et al. (1996). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93, 596-601. [0344] Xiao, X. et al. (1998). J. Virol. 72, 2224-32. doi:10.1073/pnas.1201800109. [0345] Yang, S. et al. (2016). EBioMedicine 10, 258-268. doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.07.002. [0346] Yin, L. et al. (2011). Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 52, 2775-2783. doi:10.1167/iovs.10-6250. [0347] Ying, S. et al. (1998). Curr. Eye Res., 777-782. doi:10.1076/ceyr.17.8.777.5158. [0348] Yu-Wai-Man, P. et al. (2016). Acta Neuropathol. 132, 789-806. doi:10.1007/s00401-016-1625-2. [0349] Zeng, Y. et al. (2007). J. Virol. 81, 2401-2417. doi:10.11283VI.02024-06. [0350] Zhang, Y. et al. (2009). J. Neurosci. 29, 9186-9196. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0184-09.2009. [0351] Zhao, X. et al. (2006). Brain Res. 1073-1074, 460-469. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2005.12.061. [0352] Zhu, Y. et al (2014). J. Neurosci. 34, 7845-61. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2960-13.2014. [0353] Zolotukhin, S. et al. (1999). Gene Ther. 6, 973-985. doi:10.1038/sj.gt.3300938.