Biodegradable film and laminate

Abstract

Disclosed are a biodegradable film and an enhanced biodegradable fabric and laminate prepared by laminated biodegradable films, which mainly comprise PBAT or PBS, or a mixture thereof, PLA and other degradable high molecular polymers, such as PBSA, PCL, PCL-BS and PHA, to prepare PLA, and a new mixture of PLA and PHAs, or a mixture of PLA with PBAT and PBS, or a mixture of PLA and PHAs with PBAT and PBS or other degradable high molecular polymers. The new fabrics and laminates have a stronger biodegradability in an environment containing microorganisms and have a good shelf life, and good strength, agility and flexibility.

Claims

1. A biodegradable film comprising PHAs, PLA and cellulose fiber, wherein the content of PLA is 75%?85% in mass percent, and the PHAs are PHBs or PHVs, or copolymer or blend of PHBs and PHVs; wherein the PHBs are P(3HB-co-4HB) polymerized by 3HB and 4HB, and the mole percent of 4HB is 28%; wherein the biodegradable film is configured for producing film, container for solid and liquid, rigid or flexible package, woven, knitted and non-woven fabric with filament and staple fiber, and composite product of fabric and film; the non-woven fabric is produced through melt spinning which comprises spunbond and meltdown processes and is bonded by wet adhesive or dry adhesive; the non-woven fabrics are obtained by needlepunching, hydroentangling, thermal calendering, hot air through-air thermal bonding or the following heating processes including microwave, ultrasonic wave, welding, far infrared heating and near infrared heating; wherein the composite product of fabric and film is laminated film or fabric which combines with spinning laying, needlepunching, air laying of pulp or fiber, or hydroentangling processes; wherein the biodegradable film comprises biodegradable film and PBAT, and the least compatible blending ratio of PBAT and PLA of biodegradable film is 1:1 in mass percent.

2. The biodegradable film according to claim 1, wherein the laminated film or fabric comprises thermal spunbond-meltblown-spunbond type or ultrosonically bonded type, and wherein the composite product is used for industrial protective clothing and medical protective clothing.

3. The biodegradable film according to claim 1, wherein the composite product includes meltblown filter media which exists as outer and inner facings through spun bonding and is sewn or thermally or ultrasonically bonded on the edges.

4. Biodegradable laminate comprising the biodegradable film according to claim 1 and PBS; wherein the content of PBS is 5%?20% in mass percent in the biodegradable laminate, and wherein comprising blend of PBS and PBAT, and biodegradable film as recited according to claim 1.

Description

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

(1) Although the biodegradation of P(3HB-co-4HB) product is easy to occur in soil, sludge and sea water, the biodegradation rate in water in the absence of microorganisms is still very slow (Saito, Yuji, Shigeo Nakamura, Masaya Hiramitsu and Yoshiharu Doi, Microbial Synthesis and Properties of Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-4-hydroxybutyrate), Polymer International 39 (1996), 169-174). Thus, the shelf life of P(3HB-co-4HB) product in clean environment such as dry storage in sealed package or in clean wipes cleansing solution etc. is very good. However, when located in dirty environments containing microorganisms such as soil, river water, river mud, compost of manure and sand, sludge and sea water, the disposed P(3HB-co-4HB) fabric, P(28.56-cooperative hydroxybutyrate) fabric, film and packaging material are easy to degrade. It should be pointed out that polylactic acid (PLA) is easy to be composed instead of being degraded in the dirty environments above. Heat and moisture in the resulting compost pile must firstly break the PLA polymer into smaller polymer chains which finally degrade to lactic acid. After that, microorganisms in the compost and soil consume the smaller polymer fragments and lactic acid as the nutrients.

(2) Accordingly, the mixing of hydroxybutyrate with PLA may accelerate the degradation rate of blend product made from PHAs-PLA such as P(3HB-co-4HB). Furthermore, product made by mixing PHAs with PLA has extended its shelf life in clean environment. Although the price of PLA has decreased substantially over the past 10 years to just a little more than that of synthetic polymers such as polypropylene and PET polyester, the price of PHAs still remains two to three times higher than that of PLA. This is because PLA is synthesized on a large scale from lactic acid, while PHAs are produced by bacteria with specific carbon source and have to be extracted from the bacteria with a solvent. Therefore, it is not commercially feasible to mix more than 25% PHA with PLA to melt extrude products such as woven and knitted fiber, nonwoven fabric, film, food packaging container, etc.

(3) Four groups of sample solution formulations are listed in tables 1-4, which are formulations for 400 Kg of clean wipes cleaning solution (typically the liquid contained in package of baby wipes); river water collected from the East River in Dongguan of China with some river mud; river mud collected from the East River in Dongguan of China; and a mixed compost of silt, sand and cow manure, respectively. The above-mentioned starting materials are mixed with distilled water and the resulting mixture is adjusted to a pH value of above 7 with dilute KOH. Two sample solutions with identical formulation are used for each treatment. Each of the treatment boxes containing the samples exposed to the treatment is covered and the pH value and percentage of solid are determined every two weeks. Average results in the first 4 weeks of exposure are shown in Table 5.

(4) In one embodiment of this invention, two blends of PLA and PHB, i.e. 25 Kg of blend of 85% PLA (NatureWorks 2002D) and 15% PHB (3HB-co-4HB) as well as 25 Kg of blend of 75% PLA (NatureWorks 2002D) and 25% PHB (3HB-co-4HB) are melt blended and extruded as pellets that are then shipped to Biax-Fiberflilm Corporation, Greenville, Wis., USA. Those pellets are melt spun to produce meltblown (MB) fabric with a basis weight of 50 g/m.sup.2. For the purpose of comparative test, MB fabric of 100% PLA (Nature Works 2002D) is also produced. During the MB process of these polymers, it becomes increasingly obvious that melting and hot air temperature used to prepare the MB fabric are too high since the 2002D PLA polymer has a very low melt index (indicating a very high molecular weight of PLA) and it requires higher temperature to increase the fluidity of MN PLA for its smooth extrusion through the meltblown die orifice. The melting temperature of 100% 2002D PLA is 274? C. and the hot air temperature is 576? C. On contrary, a melting temperature of 266? C. and a hot air temperature of 260? C. are generally applied for melt spinning spunbond grade PLA with a melt index of 70-80 (Wadsworth, Larry and Doug Brown, High Strength, High Quality Meltblown Insulation, Filters and Wipes with Less Energy Presentation to Guangdong Nonwovens Association Conference, Dongguan, China, Nov. 26-27, 2009). Therefore, owing to such two blends, the PHB component contained apparently undergoes some thermal degradation, which is evidenced by much smoke coming from the extruded MB fiber and the low strength of the produced MB PLA/PHB fabric. In the following experiments, it is scheduled that PLA polymer (NatureWorks PLA 6251 D) with higher melt index (which is 70-85 and requires for much lower MB processing temperature) is employed to be mixed with PHB in the same ratio. In addition, similar composition using the 6251D PLA is scheduled to be made on a 1-meter spunbond non-woven pilot line. This typically operates at a temperature that is only a little above the melting point of the PLA and the blended PLA-PHB polymer so that even less thermal degradation occurs. This is because a filament drafting step absent from the MB process is adopted in the SB process, and thus the produced filament is obviously larger than that produced from the same polymer. Compared to the MB fabric with a diameter of 2-8 ?m, the average diameter of the fiber in SB fabric is typically 12-25 ?m. The second MB operation and SB operation of these polymer compositions will reduce the thermal degradation effect to a maximum extent, and thus the degradation observed in the biodegradation process is mainly from biodegradation. Also, since the MB and SB non-woven fabrics have large differences in their diameters, the smaller MB fiber has more surface area and is expected to undergo biodegradation more readily and more quickly.

(5) The MB 100% 2002D MB fabric, the 85% 2002D PLA/15% PHB and the 75% 2002D/25% PLA rolled to have a width of 12.5 inch and a density of 50 g/m.sup.2 are shipped from Biax-Fiberfilm Company back to U.S. Pacific Nonwovens & Technical Textile Technology (DongGuan) Limited which is located at No.2 East Dyke, Aozhitang Industrial Park in Dongcheng District, Dongguan of Guangzhou Province of China and subordinate to U.S. Pacific Nonwovens Industry. Herein, 1.5 meter of each fabric is immersed with different treatment methods and then left exposed to different treatment fluids together with samples to be removed from each treatment box, while the corresponding repeated treatments are carried out at intervals of 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 16 weeks and 20 weeks.

(6) Below is the specific experiment process. First of all, MB PLA and PLA-PHB fabrics added with clean wipes cleaning solution are stored in a porous steel basket and further exposed in the treatment box. After four weeks' treatment, MB sample in compost is gently washed in a nylon stocking. Thereafter, corresponding degradation conditions can be observed after washing and drying. Some river water is applied to the MB fabric in the same manner as that of the clean wipes cleaning solution. Then the MB fabric is placed in the porous steel basket in the covered treatment box until samples of the 100% MB PLA, 85% PLA-15% PHB, and 75% PLA-25% PHB are removed from all of the treatment boxes at an interval of 4 week increments up to a total of 20 weeks. In the case of river mud and silt/sand/manure compost, the fabric to be exposed thereto is first laid onto the treatment box while being immersed and thoroughly penetrated by the treatment solution. Subsequently, the fabric is inserted into a nylon panty hose stocking with one half of a 1.5-meter sample being placed into one leg and the other half into the other leg. The stocking containing the fabric is then gently pulled over the sample and buried into the proper box containing some river mud or compost. Besides, the treatment box is attached with a label by a nylon string for each stocking. The fabric samples removed every 4 week are laid onto a metal box with a wire screen on the bottom. In this case, a nylon knitted fabric is placed on top of the wire mesh, and the treated fabric is gently washed by applying some low pressure water onto the palm. Then a second nylon knitted fabric is placed on top of the washed sample and the fabric is gently turned over to wash the other side. Finally, all of the washed and treated fabrics are placed on a laundry drying table and dried over two days until dry before being taken to the laboratory for test. A portion of each of the treated and dried fabrics is sent to an external laboratory for scanning electron microscopy analyses to determine the extent of fiber breakage as an experimental result of the treatment process. In addition, gel permeation chromatography is adopted to determine if some changes and presumable loss in molecular weight of the polymer occur during exposure to the different treatments, and differential thermal analysis is adopted to determine any changes in crystalline phase. After four weeks' different treatments, test results for physical property of the fabrics are shown in tables. Herein, table 6A is specific to 100% 2002D PLA MB fabric, table 7A to 85% 2002D PLA/15% PHB MB sample, and table 8A to 75% 2002D/25% PHB fabrics. The 100% MB PLA sample loses 6% of the machine direction (MD) tensile strength after exposure in the clean wipes cleaning solution for 4 weeks, while the 85%PLA/15% PHB and 75%PLA/PHB fabrics only lose 4% and 1% of the machine direction (MD) tensile strength, respectively, in the clean wipes cleaning solution. However, all of the 100% PLA, 85% PLA/15% PHB and 75% PLA/25% PHB lose 50%, 32% and 65% of cross machine direction (CD) trapezoid tearing strength, respectively. After 4 weeks in the river water, 100% MB PLA loses 26% of MD tensile strength and 64% of CD tearing strength, and the 85% PLA/15% PHB and 75% PLA/25% PHB lose 19% and 22% of MD tensile strength and 77% and 80% of CD tearing strength, respectively. After 4 weeks in the river mud, the 100% PLA fabric loses 91% of MD tensile strength and 98% of CD tearing strength, and the 85% PLA/15% and 75% PLA/25% PHB lose 76% and 75% of MD tensile strength and 96% and 87% of CD tearing strength, respectively. After 4 weeks in the silt/sand/cow compost, the 100% PLA loses 94% of MD tensile strength and 99% of CD tearing strength, and the 85% PLA/15% PHB and 75% PLA/25% PHB lose 76% and 86% of MD tensile strength and 99% and 83% of CD tearing strength, respectively. The air permeability of all the samples exposed to the river mud and compost increases, which causes higher air permeability value and indicate more open structures with the increase of biodegradation. Less increase in air permeability is caused to the MB 100% PLA fabric when compared with the PLA-PHB blend fabric under different treatments. Besides, none of the fabrics loses any weight and in fact some gain weight since it is difficult to remove all of the treatment debris from the samples without causing further damage to the fabrics.

(7) The exposure effects in different treatments for 12 weeks of the 100% 2002D PLA MB fabric, 85% PLA/15% PHB, and 75% PLA/25% PHB are shown in Tables 6B, 7B, and 8B, respectively. After these fabrics have been stored on a roll wrapped in plastic for 16 weeks, the 85% PLA/15% PHB are not notably low in MB and CD tenacity after 16 weeks storage, while the 75% PLA/25% PHB shows 22% loss in MD tenacity and 33% loss in CD tenacity. As what is found after 4 weeks of exposure to different treatments, after 12 weeks of exposure, MD and CD tenacities compared to those of the corresponding domestic fabrics are higher in the clean wipes solution with 100% PLA as compared to two blends of PLA and PHB. All of the samples show appreciable degradation in river water, river mud and silt/sand/manure compost after 12 weeks.

(8) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Formulation for Clean Wipes Cleaning Solution Loaded in Two Different Boxes Weight Weight Ingredient Percentage (%) (Kg) Purified Water 97.56 390.24 Propylene Glycol 1.2 4.8 Lanolin 0.6 2.4 Cocoamphodiacte 0.3 1.2 Polysorbate-20 0.1 0.4 Ethylparaben 0.0167 0.0668 Methylparaben 0.0167 0.0668 Propylparaben 0.0167 0.0668 Benzalkonium Chloride 0.075 0.3 Disodium EDTA 0.075 0.3 Citric Acid 0.01 0.04 aromatic hydrocarbon 0.03 0.120 Total 100.0 400 Kg (approx. 400 L)

(9) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Composition of River Water in Each of Two Boxes Ingredient Weight (Kg) River Water 380 River Mud 20 Total 400 Kg

(10) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Composition of River Mud in Each of Two Boxes Ingredient Weight (Kg) River Mud 300 River Water 100 Total 400

(11) TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Weight Compositions of Silt, Sand, Cow Manure and Distilled Water in Each of the Two Boxes Ingredients Weight percentage (%) Weight (Kg) Silt 23 69 Sand 23 69 Cow Manure 23 69 Distilled Water 31 93 pH value is adjusted to 7.5 by 10% Potassium Hydroxide. (Weight of KOH is included in the composition of distilled water.) Total 100 300 Kg

Illustration of Table 4:

(12) 69 Kg of dry silt (obtained from river by USP gardener) is added to a large mixing container;

(13) 69 Kg of dry cow manure is added, which has already been broken up into small pieces by a large electric mixer;

(14) 69 Kg of dry sand is added slowly during mixing operation;

(15) 83 Kg of distilled water is added slowly during stirring operation;

(16) In the case of complete mixing, pH value is detected by a litmus paper or a pH meter. 10% potassium hydroxide (prepared in distilled water) is added slowly until the pH value reaches 7.5.

(17) Remaining amount of distilled water is added so that the water containing calcium hydroxide accounts for 93 Kg in total. pH value is checked and further adjusted to 7.5.

(18) TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 pH Value and Percentage of Solids in Treatment Boxes for Biax MB PLA (2002D) and MB PLA (2002D) Blended with 15% and 25% PHB pH value Percentage of solid Treatment First Replication Average First Replication Average Clean wipes Cleaning Solution 3.92 3.94 3.93 1.30 1.32 1.31 River Water 6.89 6.98 6.94 0.13 0.14 0.14 River Mud 7.19 7.18 7.18 51.8 50.4 51.1 Silt/Sand/Manure Compost 7.36 7.51 7.44 52.4 54.6 53.5

(19) TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 6A Weight, Thickness, Air Permeability and Strength Properties of 100% PLA (2002D) at post-production and after Exposure for Four Weeks to Clean Wipes Cleaning Solution, River Water, River Mud and Silt/Sand/Manure Compost 100% PLA 2002D after 4 Weeks Tenacity Tearing Air (N) Elongation Strength (N) Weight Thickness Perm. MD (%) CD (g/m.sup.2) (mm) (l/m.sup.2 .Math. s) % Loss CD MD CD % Loss Post-production 46.4 0.400 2122 31.8 14.0 10.1 57.2 22.1 Clean wipes 47.2 0.366 2298 29.9 6 12.8 6.8 29.8 11.0 50 Cleaning Solution River 45.8 0.384 2260 23.6 26 9.8 3.2 3.8 8.0 64 Water River Mud 49.2 0.394 2672 3.0 91 1.2 3.0 1.2 0.4 98 Silt/Sand/Manure 56.8 0.472 2506 1.8 94 0.6 0.7 0.4 0.2 99 Compost

(20) TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 7A Weight, Thickness, Air Permeability and Strength Properties of 85% PLA (2002D)/15% PHB at post-production and after Exposure for Four Weeks in Clean Wipes Cleaning Solution, River Water, River Mud and Silt/Sand/Manure Compost 85% PLA/15% PHB after 4 Weeks Tenacity Tearing Air (N) Elongation Strength (N) Weight Thickness Perm MD (%) CD (g/m.sup.2) (mm) (l/m.sup.2 .Math. s) % Loss CD MD CD % Loss Post-production 57.8 0.455 3134 14.4 9.7 19.8 32.9 7.9 Clean wipes 52.5 0.536 3876 13.8 4 9.4 13.5 21.3 3.4 57 Cleaning Solution River 58.8 0.460 3024 11.6 19 7.2 4.2 7.0 1.8 77 Water River Mud 63.2 0.531 3639 3.4 76 2.2 2.7 3.4 0.3 96 Silt/Sand/Manure 59.8 0.508 3916 3.5 76 1.4 3.6 3.6 0.1 99 Compost

(21) TABLE-US-00008 TABLE 8A Weight, Thickness, Air Permeability and Strength Properties of 75% PLA (2002D)/25% PHB at Post-production and after Exposure for Four Weeks in Clean Wipes Cleaning Solution, River Water, River Mud and Silt/Sand/Manure Compost 75% PLA/25% PHB after 4 Weeks Tenacity Tearing Air (N) Elongation Strength (N) Weight Thickness Perm MD (%) CD (g/m.sup.2) (mm) (l/m.sup.2 .Math. s) % Loss CD MD CD % Loss Post-production 53.8 0.387 3740 8.5 3.6 5.2 12.0 3.7 Clean wipes 56.2 0.344 3708 8.4 1 3.8 2.5 4.4 1.3 65 Cleaning Solution River 53.6 0.338 3627 6.6 22 2.4 1.6 1.8 0.74 80 Water River Mud 53.7 0.403 4502 2.1 75 0.8 2.6 2.6 0.48 87 Silt/Sand/Manure 61.5 0.460 5448 1.2 86 0.8 3.6 9.1 0.62 83 Compost

(22) TABLE-US-00009 TABLE 6B Weight, Thickness, Air Permeability and Strength Properties of 100% PLA (2002D) MB Wet Wipes at Post-production After 3 and 16 Weeks and After Exposure for 12 Weeks in Clean Wipes Solution, River Water, River Mud and Silt/Sand/Manure Compost 100% PLA 2002D After 12 Weeks Tenacity Tearing Air (N) Elongation Strength (N) Weight Thickness Perm MD CD (%) CD (g/m.sup.2) (mm) (l/m.sup.2 .Math. s) % Loss % Loss MD CD % Loss Post-production 46.4 0.400 2122 31.8 14.0 10.1 57.2 22.1 after 3 Weeks Post-production 44.8 0.396 2079 32.2 0 12.7 9 7.0 45.4 9.8 56 after 16 Weeks Clean Wipes 46.7 0.41 2328 14.5 54 3.8 73 1.2 1.0 2.3 90 Solution River Water 46.6 0.392 2272 4.9 85 2.4 83 0.6 0.7 0.8 96 River Mud 49.2 0.408 2652 0.6 98 0.2 99 0.9 0.2 0.3 99 Silt/Sand/Manure * * * * * * * * * * * Compost * Samples are too disintegrated to perform physical testing.

(23) TABLE-US-00010 TABLE 7B Weight, Thickness, Air Permeability and Strength Properties of 85% PLA (2002D)/15% PHB at Post-production After 3 and 16 Weeks and After Exposure for 12 Weeks in Clean Wipes Solution, River Water, River Mud and Silt/Sand/Manure Compost 85% PLA/15% PHB After 12 Weeks Tenacity Tearing Air (N) Elongation Strength (N) Weight Thickness Perm MD CD (%) CD (g/m.sup.2) (mm) (l/m.sup.2 .Math. s) % Loss % Loss MD CD % Loss Post-production 57.8 0.455 3134 14.4 9.7 19.8 32.9 7.9 after 3 Weeks Post-production 54.9 0.441 3049 15.0 0 9.5 2 19.2 31.5 7.1 10 for 16 weeks Clean Wipes 60.6 0.576 3418 10.0 31 5.4 44 4.2 8.0 2.3 71 Solution River Water 61.4 0.506 2853 8.5 41 6.3 35 5.6 11.4 2.2 72 River Mud 66.9 0.522 3020 2.5 83 1.9 80 2.1 2.7 0.6 92 Silt/Sand/Manure 62.6 0.490 3152 2.5 83 3.2 67 2.4 4.8 1.1 86 Compost *Samples are too disintegrated to perform physical testing.

(24) TABLE-US-00011 TABLE 8B Weight, Thickness, Air Permeability and Strength Properties of 75% PLA (2002D)/25% PHB at Post-production d After 3 and 16 Weeks and After Exposure for 12 Weeks in Clean Wipes Solution, River Water, River Mud and Silt/Sand/Manure Compost 75% PLA/25% PHB After 12 Weeks Tenacity Tearing Air (N) Elongation Strength (N) Weight Thickness Perm MD CD (%) CD (g/m.sup.2) (mm) (l/m.sup.2 .Math. s) % Loss % Loss MD CD % Loss Post-production 53.8 0.387 3740 8.5 3.6 5.2 12.0 3.7 after 3 Weeks Post-production 55.5 0.383 3339 6.6 22 2.4 33 1.5 1.6 1.5 59 after 16 Weeks Clean Wipes 56.8 0.376 3838 4.6 46 1.9 47 1.4 2.2 0.7 81 Solution River Water 46.8 0.346 3182 4.4 48 1.4 61 0.9 0.6 0.5 86 River Mud 57.4 0.440 5129 1.1 87 1.1 69 2.0 2.9 0.7 81 Silt/Sand/Manure * * * * * * * * * * * Compost * Samples are too disintegrated to perform physical testing.

(25) In addition to the biodegradation studies described above, pure PBAT films in a thickness of 9 micron (?m) with or without 20% calcium carbonate are obtained from a vendor in China. Meltblown (MB) Vistamaxx? containing 20% PP is obtained from Biax-Fiberfilm Corporation in Neenah, Wis., USA. Spunbond (SB) PLA pigmented black with carbon black with a nominal weight of 80 g/m.sup.2 is obtained from Saxon Textile Research Institute in Germany. The pure PBAT film and PBAT film with 20% calcium carbonate are laminated in separate trials to Vistamaxx MB containing 20% PP and black SB PLA using hot-melt adhesive of 5-13 g/m.sup.2. At this point, hot-melt adhesive generally of 0.5-12 g/m.sup.2 and preferably of 1-7 g/m.sup.2 are adopted. In addition, two layers of SB PLA are laminated and adhered using hot-melt adhesive. All of the raw materials and laminates are tested as shown in Table 9 for weight, thickness, tenacity, elongation-to-break, tearing strength, bursting strength, water vapor transmission rate (WVT) and hydrohead. It should be pointed that these are only some samples of different embodiments of this invention and that in addition to using a hot-melt technology to adhere different layers of the materials below together, the PBAT films or other biodegradable/compostable films can be directly applied to the substrates by extrusion coating without the necessary adoption of an adhesive. The laminate can be joined or bonded together by a portion of technologies listed below such as thermal point calendaring, overall-calendering or ultra-sonic welding. Furthermore, instead of a hot-melt adhesive, glue, or water or solvent-based adhesives or latexes can be used to adhere the laminates together.

(26) As shown in Table 9, the 9 ?m pure (100%) PBAT film (sample 1) has good elongation in the MD direction and very high elongation of over 300% in the CD. The bursting strength test cannot be performed on samples 1 through 5 because all of these samples are so elastic that the films and laminates do not rupture during the test and appeared free of deformation after the test. The water vapor transmission rate of sample 1 is rather high at 3380 g/m.sup.2/24 hours as was the hydrostatic head at 549 mm. The PBAT film containing 20% calcium carbonate (CaCO.sub.3) (sample 2) has similar properties as sample 1 with the same WVTR and lower hydrohead. PBAT film similar to samples 1 and 2 with a smaller thickness of 6 ?m or less would also be expected to have good elongation and higher WVTR, although its hydrohead may be lower. The meltblown (MB) sample 3, containing 80% Vistamaxx? (Vistamaxx polyolefin-based polymer high in elasticity and produced by ExxonMobil) and 20% PP has a very high MD and CD elongation of about 300% and a very high WVTR of 8816 g/m.sup.2/24 hours when the fabric is fairly open. However, the hydrohead of sample 3 is rather high at 1043 mm, which indicates it still has good barrier properties. It should be pointed that 20% PP is added to the Vistamaxx polymer pellets and physically mixed before the blend is fed into an MB extruder and melted so that the Vistamaxx MB fabric will not be too sticky. If 100% Vistamaxx is meltblown, it will be very sticky, block on the roll and be difficult to un-wind for lamination or use later. Nevertheless, it is most feasible to meltblow 100% Vistamaxx if the MB Vistamaxx is laminated in-line with a film such as PBAT or PBS with or without CaCO.sub.3 or to another non-woven, scrim or fabric. In fact it may not be necessary to use an adhesive since 100% Vistamaxx or a higher concentration of Vistamaxx is already very sticky.

(27) Compared to the unique adoption of Vistamaxx, the lamination of the pure PBAT and PBAT containing 20% CaCO.sub.3 with Vistamaxx using a hot-melt adhesive notably increases the MD and CD tenacity. These samples also have very high MB elongation and particularly high CD elongation (390% for sample 4 and 542% for sample 5). Also, samples 4 and 5 have notably high MVTR values of 1671 and 1189 g/m.sup.2/24 hours and high hydroheads of 339 and 926 mm H.sub.2O, respectively. Again it should be pointed that the PBAT films can be extrusion-coated directly onto MB 100% Vistamaxx or onto MB Vistamaxx with some PP with or without the use of a hot-melt adhesive, and the extrusion-coating process can allow a much thinner PBAT film to be used, possibly as low as 4 or 5 ?m, with a resulting higher MVTR but with possibly lower hydrohead.

(28) The black SB PLA with a target weight of 80 g/m.sup.2 has a MD tenacity of 104 N and a CD tenacity of 31 N, while its MD elongation is low to be 3.6% and CD elongation is high to be 30.7%. Its busting strength is 177 KN/m.sup.2, the WVTR is rather high at 8322 g/m.sup.2/24 hours and the hydrohead is notable at 109 mm. The MD and CD tenacity of the 80 g/m black SB PLA, which is laminated to pure PBAT with hot-melt adhesive, are higher than those with the SB PLA alone at 107 and 39 N, respectively, but its CD elongation is only 9.8%. However, the PBAT laminated SB PLA has higher bursting strength at 220 KN/m.sup.2. The breathability is still good with a WVTR of 2459 g/m.sup.2/24 hours and a very high hydrohead of 3115 mm H.sub.2O. The SB PLA laminated with PBAT containing 20% CaCO3 has similar properties to sample 8, except that the hydrohead still high at 2600 mm H.sub.2O becomes lower. The lamination of SB PLA with thinner PBAT film, and especially with thinner PBAT film deposited by extrusion coating, produces protective apparel for medical, industrial or sports applications. At this regard, the lamination has high MVTR for wearing comfort and high hydrostatic head for barrier protection. The barrier protection can be further enhanced by the application of a repellent finish (fluorochemical silicone or other types of repellent finishes) to either the PBAT film side or to the SB PLA on either side before or after lamination with the film Another enhancement is the lamination of MB PLA with SB PLA before or after lamination with the film. The repellent finishing agent can also possibly be added to the polymer melt used to produce the PBAT film, SB or MB PLA, for example.

(29) When two layers of SB PLA are melt-adhesively bonded together to produce sample 9, the MD and CD tenacities and bursting strengths are essentially twice as those of one layer of sample 6. The target MD and CD tenacities and corresponding elongation-to-break (% elongation) values of patient lifting slings produced from 110 g/m.sup.2 SB PP are at least 200 and 140 N/5 cm, respectively. As shown in Table 9, the MD tenacity of the two adhered layers of SB PLA is 215 N but their CD tenacity is only about 50% of the required level. Also the MD and CD % elongation values are much lower than the required minimum of 40%. The MD and CD elongations of SB PLA can be improved by blending PBAT from 5 to 60% (preferably from 20 to 50% PBAT) with the PLA prior to extrusion of the SB fabrics. Furthermore, PBAT and PBS may be blended with PLA to achieve fabric with the desired MD and CD tenacity and elongation values as well as stability to heat exposure. Furthermore, the SB filament web may be bonded by processes other than thermal point calendaring to achieve greater multi-directional strength and elongation to include hydroentanglement and needlepunching. Needlepunched SB PLA can be produced at greater weights than 110 g/m.sup.2 without the need to laminate and bond two or more SB PLA fabrics together to achieve the required strength and elongation values.

(30) TABLE-US-00012 TABLE 9 Strength and Barrier Properties of Laminates of PBAT Film with Meltblown (MB) Vistamaxx? and Spunbond (SB) PLA and of a Laminate of Two SB PLA Layers Tear Tenacity Strength Burst Sample No./ Weight Thick N/5 cm Elongation % Trapzoid, N Strength WVTR Hydrohead Description g/m.sup.2 mm MD CD MD CD MD CD KN/m.sup.2 g/m.sup.224 hr mm H.sub.2O 1/Pure PBAT 8.9 0.009 10.0 5.1 67.7 307.6 1.5 14.6 *DNB 3380 549 Film, 9 ?m 2/PBAT Film 9.3 0.010 8.9 4.1 48.1 296.3 1.8 8.0 DNB 2803 415 with 20% CaCO.sub.3 3/MB 42.1 0.229 17.2 11.6 304.0 295.8 16.0 8.6 DNB 8816 1043 Vistamaxx & 20% PP 4/PBAT Film + 63.9 0.242 31.4 16.0 179.5 390.0 24.6 8.5 DNB 1671 339 Vistamaxx 5/PBAT Film + 65.3 0.249 25 17.7 116.6 541.9 22.0 10 DNB 1189 926 20% CaCO.sub.3 + Vistamaxx 6/Black 80 gsm 81.3 0.580 102.4 30.7 3.6 30.7 6.2 12.0 177 8322 109 SB PLA 7/Black 80 gsm 101.3 0.584 107.0 39.2 4.6 9.8 8.5 20.7 220 2459 3115 SB PLA + Pure PBAT Film 8/Black 80 gsm 96.5 0.557 97.0 36.3 4.9 8.0 9.3 19.0 151 2353 2600 SB PLA + PBAT Film-20% CaCO.sub.3 9/2 Layers of 183.6 1.060 215.3 76.8 4.9 9.4 14.7 22.5 503 7886 70 Black SB PLA Bonded by 3 gsm hot-Melt *DNBfree of burst due to high elasticity