CERAMIC MATERIAL AND CUTTING TOOLS MADE THEREOF

20170334790 · 2017-11-23

Assignee

Inventors

US classification

  • 1/1

Cpc classification

International classification

Abstract

A ceramic material includes of β-sialon (Si.sub.(6-z)Al.sub.zO.sub.zN.sub.(8-z)), polytype 15R, an intergranular phase, and yttrium. The polytype 15R includes twin grains.

Claims

1.-3. (canceled)

4. A ceramic material consisting of: β-sialon (Si.sub.(6-z)Al.sub.zO.sub.zN.sub.(8-z)), polytype 15R, and intergranular phase, and yttrium, wherein: z is the substitution rate in the β-sialon; and the polytype 15R comprises twin grains.

5. The ceramic material according to claim 4, wherein: an amount of the polytype 15R is between 25% and 55%, as measured as a ratio of a height in a Cu-Kα X-ray diffraction pattern of 15R peak at a 2θ value of 34° and a height in the same diffraction pattern of a β-sialon peak at a 2θ value of 33°.

6. A cutting tool for machining a chip-forming metal, comprising: the ceramic material according to claim 5.

7. A cutting tool for machining a chip-forming metal, comprising: the ceramic material according to claim 4.

8. A ceramic material comprising: β-sialon (Si.sub.(6-z)Al.sub.zO.sub.zN.sub.(8-z)), polytype 15R, and intergranular phase, and yttrium, wherein: z is the substitution rate in the β-sialon; and the polytype 15R comprises twin grains.

9. The ceramic material according to claim 8, wherein: an amount of the polytype 15R is between 25% and 55%, as measured as a ratio of a height in a Cu-Kα X-ray diffraction pattern of 15R peak at a 2θ value of 34° and a height in the same diffraction pattern of a β-sialon peak at a 2θ value of 33°.

10. A cutting tool for machining a chip-forming metal, comprising: the ceramic material according to claim 9.

11. A cutting tool for machining a chip-forming metal, comprising: the ceramic material according to claim 8.

12. The ceramic material according to claim 8, wherein:
1.3≦z≦1.8.

13. The ceramic material according to claim 12, wherein:
1.6≦z≦1.7.

14. The ceramic material according to claim 8, wherein the ceramic material is devoid of Mg.

15. The ceramic material according to claim 8, comprising reaction products of Si.sub.3N.sub.4, AlN, Y.sub.2O.sub.3 and Al.sub.2O.sub.3, but not MgO.

16. A ceramic material consisting essentially of: β-sialon (Si.sub.(6-z)Al.sub.zO.sub.zN.sub.(8-z)), polytype 15R, and intergranular phase, and yttrium, wherein: z is the substitution rate in the β-sialon; and the polytype 15R comprises twin grains.

17. The ceramic material according to claim 16, wherein: an amount of the polytype 15R is between 25% and 55%, as measured as a ratio of a height in a Cu-Kα X-ray diffraction pattern of 15R peak at a 2θ value of 34° and a height in the same diffraction pattern of a β-sialon peak at a 2θ value of 33°.

18. The ceramic material according to claim 16, wherein:
1.3≦z≦1.8.

19. The ceramic material according to claim 18, wherein:
1.6≦z≦1.7.

20. The ceramic material according to claim 16, wherein the ceramic material is devoid of Mg.

21. The ceramic material according to claim 16, consisting essentially of reaction products of Si.sub.3N.sub.4, AlN, Y.sub.2O.sub.3 and Al.sub.2O.sub.3.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

[0016] The above and other objects, features and advantages of the present disclosure will become more apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art by describing in detail exemplary embodiments thereof with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:

[0017] FIG. 1 shows an X-ray diffraction pattern from a ceramic material according to an exemplary embodiment;

[0018] FIG. 2 is a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) micrograph of a ceramic material according to an exemplary embodiment;

[0019] FIG. 3 shows a variation of Vickers hardness (H.sub.V) according to ratio of polytype 15R;

[0020] FIG. 4 shows a variation of Rockwell hardness (H.sub.Ra) according to ratio of polytype 15R;

[0021] FIG. 5 shows a variation of fracture toughness (K.sub.IC) according to ratio of polytype 15R;

[0022] FIG. 6 shows a variation of brittleness (B.sub.I) according to ratio of polytype 15R;

[0023] FIG. 7 shows a variation of wear resistance (R.sub.W) according to ratio of polytype 15R; and

[0024] FIG. 8 shows a milling test result of a cutting tool according to an exemplary embodiment.

MODE FOR THE INVENTION

[0025] The raw materials used for the preparation of a ceramic material according to an exemplary embodiment and ratios thereof are shown in [Table 1] below. Y.sub.2O.sub.3 content and MgO content, which include metal ions for use as a catalyst in the preparation of the ceramic material, are fixed at 4 wt %.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Weight % No Si.sub.3N.sub.4 MgO AlN Y.sub.2O.sub.3 Al.sub.2O.sub.3 1 69.99 7.46 4.000 18.55 2 69.99 0.500 7.46 3.500 18.55 3 66.73 10.3 4.000 18.97 4 63.47 13.14 4.000 19.39 5 60.2 15.99 4.000 19.81 6 56.94 18.83 4.000 20.23 7 53.67 21.68 4.000 20.65 8 50.41 24.52 4.000 21.07 9 63.54 9.31 4.000 23.15 10 63.54 0.500 9.31 3.500 23.15 11 60.62 12.05 4.000 23.33 12 57.69 14.8 4.000 23.51 13 54.76 17.55 4.000 23.69 14 48.9 23.05 4.000 24.05 15 45.97 25.8 4.000 24.23

[0026] Powder mixture mixed at wt % according to [Table 1] is added with methanol as a solvent, a dispersant and a binder, and milled with a ball mill for about 20 hr. The raw materials are milled as described above so that a slurry of the raw materials is prepared.

[0027] After milling to prepare slurry, the slurry is granulated through a spray dryer. Powder is obtained by passing the granulated raw materials through a sieve.

[0028] The obtained powder is compressed into a compact. The compact is subject to debinding, and then sintered and densified during 2 hours of gas pressure sintering at 1680° C.˜1820° C.

[0029] [Table 2] below shows the ceramic material prepared from the Examples shown in [Table 1] by the procedures described above. Further, the prepared ceramic material was analyzed with the X-ray diffractography.

[0030] FIG. 1 shows an X-ray diffraction pattern from a ceramic material according to an exemplary embodiment. For reference, referring to FIG. 1, (3 represents β-sialon (Si.sub.6-zAl.sub.zO.sub.zN.sub.(8-z)), and 15R represents polytype 15R phase. Further, FIG. 1 shows the X-ray diffraction pattern of Example 14 (No. 14) for an example.

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 z value of β-SiAlON (substitution rate) ratio of No Za Zc average 15R/beta (%) 1 1.45 1.46 1.46 0 2 1.48 1.50 1.49 0 3 1.48 1.47 1.48 4.71 4 1.47 1.47 1.47 9.18 5 1.43 1.44 1.43 19.48 6 1.39 1.38 1.38 30.69 7 1.39 1.37 1.38 39.22 8 1.39 1.36 1.37 51.17 9 1.84 1.85 1.85 0 10 1.89 1.90 1.90 0 11 1.76 1.79 1.78 5.64 12 1.77 1.77 1.77 12.2 13 1.71 1.74 1.73 21.47 14 1.68 1.69 1.68 48.8 15 1.63 1.65 1.64 71.22

[0031] Referring to FIG. 1, it is noted that the ceramic material according to an exemplary embodiment includes β-sialon, but does not include α-sialon. Further, based on the peak around 34° and a plurality of satellite peaks shown in FIG. 1, it is understood that the ceramic material according to an exemplary embodiment includes the polytype 15R phase.

[0032] Further, based on the X-ray diffraction pattern as shown in FIG. 1, a z value of the β-sialon included in the ceramic material prepared according to Examples of the present disclosure can be determined.

[0033] Additionally, the amount of the polytype 15R phase can be determined based on the ratio of the height in a Cu-Kα X-ray diffraction pattern of 15R peak at a 2θ value (b) of 34°, and the ratio of the height in a Cu-Kα X-ray diffraction pattern of the β-sialon peak at a 2θ value (a) of 33°.

[0034] FIG. 2 is a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) micrograph of a ceramic material according to an exemplary embodiment. For reference, FIG. 2 is the SEM micrograph of a sample prepared from Example 14 (No. 14). As shown in FIG. 2, the ceramic material consists of β-sialon, polytype 15R phase, and intergranular phase between β-sialon and polytype 15R phase.

[0035] Additionally, referring to FIG. 2, it is noted that the polytype 15R phase includes crystal grains of bright bands and dark bands repeatedly stacked on one another. Such crystal grains may be the twin grains. Accordingly, it is understood that, in the ceramic material according to an exemplary embodiment, the polytype 15R phase may include twin grains.

[0036] Among the materials for a ceramic material, Example 2 and Example 10 that include MgO do not form polytype 15R phase. In other words, among Examples 1 to 15, the Examples that form the polytype 15R phase use Y.sub.2O.sub.3 as a catalyst.

[0037] Accordingly, the ceramic material according to an exemplary embodiment may consist of β-sialon, polytype 15R phase and intergranular phase between β-sialon and polytype 15R phase, and may contain yittrium (Y) which was included in the raw material. Further, in the ceramic material according to an exemplary embodiment, the polytype 15R phase may include twin grains.

[0038] <Evaluation 1>

[0039] Examples 1 to 16 were tested for Vickers hardness (H.sub.V), Rockwell hardness (H.sub.R) and fracture toughness (K.sub.IC), as shown in [Table 3] below. Referring to [Table 3], the unit of the Vickers hardness (H.sub.V) is kgf/mm.sup.2, and the unit of fracture toughness (K.sub.IC) is Pa.Math.m.sup.1/2.

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 ratio of No H.sub.v H.sub.Ra K.sub.IC 15R/beta (%) 1 1535.4 93.8 3.5 0 2 1542.7 93.8 3.42 0 3 1536.8 93.8 3.53 4.71 4 1526.3 93.7 3.58 9.18 5 1515.6 93.7 3.54 19.48 6 1514.6 93.6 3.71 30.69 7 1514.1 93.5 3.69 39.22 8 1487.4 93.4 3.73 51.17 9 1489.5 93.8 3.2 0 10 1514.6 93.8 3.14 0 11 1502.1 93.6 3.29 5.64 12 1493.3 93.6 3.02 12.2 13 1494.6 93.6 3.24 21.47 14 1475.6 93.3 3.59 48.8 15 1469.1 93.2 3.39 71.22

[0040] Referring to [Table 3], the Vickers hardness (H.sub.V) was measured, by pressing with a square base diamond pyramid indenter consisting of a 136 degree included angle between opposite faces under 10 kg load, and measuring a diagonal line of the concave portion. At this time, the descending speed of the indenter was 150 μm/s, and 15 seconds of indentation time was maintained.

[0041] For the Rockwell hardness (H.sub.Ra) of [Table 3], a steel ball of a predetermined shape or a diamond cone-shaped indenter was used to exert an initial reference load, after which the load was increased to test load (60 kgf in the measuring of the present disclosure). The load was then returned to the initial reference load. The Rockwell hardness was then defined based on the difference of depths of the two indentations, i.e., the difference between the depth under reference loading and depth of the indentation.

[0042] The fracture toughness (K.sub.IC) in [Table 3] is measured using [Mathematical equation 1] suggested by Lawn B. R. and Fuller E. R. in “Equilibrium penny-like cracks in indentation fracture” (J. Mat. Sci. 12: 2016-2024(1975)).

[00001] K IC = 0.0726 × P C 1.5 [ Mathematical .Math. .Math. equation .Math. .Math. 1 ]

[0043] where, P denotes indentation load (10 kg), and c is a length of crack.

[0044] FIG. 3 shows a variation of Vickers hardness (H.sub.V) according to ratio of polytype 15R. FIG. 4 shows a variation of Rockwell hardness (H.sub.Ra) according to ratio of polytype 15R. FIG. 5 shows a variation of fracture toughness (K.sub.IC) according to ratio of polytype 15R.

[0045] Referring to FIGS. 3 and 4, the Vickers hardness (H.sub.V) or the Rockwell hardness (H.sub.Ra) shows decreasing tendency as the ratio of polytype 15R increases.

[0046] However, referring to FIG. 5, except for Example 15, it is noted that the fracture toughness (K.sub.IC) exhibits an increasing tendency as the ratio of the polytype 15R increases.

[0047] Additionally, [Table 4] shows the brittleness index (B.sub.1) and wear resistance (R.sub.W) according to different ratios of polytype 15R.

TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 ratio of No 15R/beta (%) B.sub.I (×10.sup.3) Rw 1 0 4.30 0.66 2 0 4.42 0.65 3 4.71 4.27 0.66 4 9.18 4.18 0.67 5 19.48 4.20 0.67 6 30.69 4.00 0.69 7 39.22 4.02 0.69 8 51.17 3.91 0.70 9 0 4.56 0.63 10 0 4.73 0.61 11 5.64 4.47 0.64 12 12.2 4.85 0.60 13 21.47 4.52 0.63 14 48.8 4.03 0.69 15 71.22 4.25 0.66

[0048] Referring to [Table 4], the brittleness index (B.sub.1) is proportional to the Vickers hardness (H.sub.V), but is inversely proportional to the fracture toughness (K.sub.IC). [Mathematical equation 2] as below is used to obtain the brittleness index (B.sub.1) in [Table 4].


B.sub.1=H.sub.V/K.sub.IC  [Mathematical equation 2]

[0049] The wear resistance (R.sub.W) in [Table 4] is an index to the frictional wear excluding chemical wear, which is inversely proportional to the Vickers hardness (H.sub.V), but is proportional to the fracture toughness (K.sub.IC). Also notable is higher sensitivity to the variation of fracture toughness (K.sub.IC), than to the Vickers hardness (H.sub.V). [Mathematical equation 3] as below is used to obtain the wear resistance (R.sub.W) in [Table 4].


R.sub.W=K.sub.IC.sup.3/4/H.sub.V.sup.0.5  [Mathematical equation 3]

[0050] FIG. 6 shows a variation of brittleness (B.sub.1) according to ratio of polytype 15R. FIG. 7 shows a variation of wear resistance (R.sub.W) according to ratio of polytype 15R.

[0051] Referring to [Table 4], and FIGS. 6 and 7, as the ratio of the polytype 15R phase increases, wear resistance shows increasing tendency, while brittleness index shows decreasing tendency. That is, as shown in FIG. 3, the Vickers hardness (H.sub.V) shows decreasing tendency as the ratio of the polytype 15R increases, and as shown in FIG. 5 (but excluding Example 15), the fracture toughness (K.sub.IC) shows increasing tendency as a ratio of the polytype 15R increases, which are similar to the tendencies shown in FIGS. 6 and 7.

[0052] More specifically, it is understood that a ceramic material having between 25% and 55% of a ratio of polytype 15R phase may have lower brittleness index, but have higher wear resistance than the ceramic materials including polytype 15R phase of other ranges.

[0053] In the ceramic material according to an exemplary embodiment, the amount of the polytype 15R phase may be between 25% and 55%.

[0054] For example, referring to Example 14, one will be able to predict that a cutting tool insert would exhibit good wear resistance, as it is fabricated by processing the ceramic material with high ratio of polytype 15R phase.

[0055] <Evaluation 2>

[0056] Cutting tools, i.e., inserts were fabricated with the ceramic materials prepared according to Examples 10, 11 and 14 of [Table 1]. Each insert was subject to a test with Inconel 718 by a turning, at a speed of 740 m/min, moving speed of 0.1 mm/rev, and to a cutting depth of 1.5 mm and a cutting width of 20 mm. No cutting oil was used.

[0057] The frequency of cycles of withstanding by each insert was recorded, until the flank wear depth (Vb) became 0.45 mm.

[0058] FIG. 8 shows a milling test result of a cutting tool according to an exemplary embodiment.

[0059] FIG. 8 is based on the life of a cutting tool of Example 10 which is used with β-sialon free of polytype 15R.

[0060] When the life of the cutting tool fabricated with β-sialon without polytype 15R is 100, the life of a cutting tool fabricated with a ceramic material (Example 11) including 5.64% polytype 15R and β-sialon can be 104.

[0061] Further, when the life of the cutting tool fabricated with β-sialon without polytype 15R is 100, the life of a cutting tool fabricated with a ceramic material (Example 14) including 48.8% polytype 15R and β-sialon can be 266.

[0062] As indicated by the milling test result of FIG. 8, it is notable that the cutting tool fabricated with a ceramic material of Example 14 with the higher ratio of polytype 15R exhibits longest life. In other words, it is understood that the cutting tool fabricated with the ceramic material of Example 14 of higher polytype 15R ratio exhibits higher wear resistance than the cutting tool fabricated with the ceramic material of Example 11 with lower polytype 15R ratio, and also exhibits better wear resistance than the cutting tool fabricated with the ceramic material of Example 10 which is free of polytype 15R.

[0063] The milling test result of FIG. 8 reveals that the tendency is in agreement with that exhibited by [Table 4] and FIG. 7.

[0064] Those with ordinary knowledge in the technical field of the present disclosure will be able to understand that the present disclosure can be embodied into different and more detailed modes, without departing from the technical concept or without modifying essential characteristics thereof. Accordingly, it will be understood that the exemplary embodiments described above are only illustrative, and should not be construed as limiting. While the scope of the present disclosure is represented by the claims accompanied below, the meaning and the scope of the claims, and all the modifications or modified forms that can be derived from the equivalent concepts will have to be interpreted as falling into the scope of the present disclosure.