CERAMIC MATERIAL AND CUTTING TOOLS MADE THEREOF
20170334790 · 2017-11-23
Assignee
Inventors
- SUNG SU CHUN (Dalsung-gun, Daegu, KR)
- Dae Yeop LEE (Dalsung-gun, Daegu, KR)
- Geun Ho PARK (Dalsung-gun, Daegu, KR)
- Chang Hoon HONG (Dalsung-gun, Daegu, KR)
US classification
- 1/1
Cpc classification
B23B27/148
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
C04B2235/96
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C04B2235/3225
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C01B21/0826
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C04B2235/3217
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C04B2235/767
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C04B2235/3873
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C04B35/62655
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C04B2235/3206
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
International classification
Abstract
A ceramic material includes of β-sialon (Si.sub.(6-z)Al.sub.zO.sub.zN.sub.(8-z)), polytype 15R, an intergranular phase, and yttrium. The polytype 15R includes twin grains.
Claims
1.-3. (canceled)
4. A ceramic material consisting of: β-sialon (Si.sub.(6-z)Al.sub.zO.sub.zN.sub.(8-z)), polytype 15R, and intergranular phase, and yttrium, wherein: z is the substitution rate in the β-sialon; and the polytype 15R comprises twin grains.
5. The ceramic material according to claim 4, wherein: an amount of the polytype 15R is between 25% and 55%, as measured as a ratio of a height in a Cu-Kα X-ray diffraction pattern of 15R peak at a 2θ value of 34° and a height in the same diffraction pattern of a β-sialon peak at a 2θ value of 33°.
6. A cutting tool for machining a chip-forming metal, comprising: the ceramic material according to claim 5.
7. A cutting tool for machining a chip-forming metal, comprising: the ceramic material according to claim 4.
8. A ceramic material comprising: β-sialon (Si.sub.(6-z)Al.sub.zO.sub.zN.sub.(8-z)), polytype 15R, and intergranular phase, and yttrium, wherein: z is the substitution rate in the β-sialon; and the polytype 15R comprises twin grains.
9. The ceramic material according to claim 8, wherein: an amount of the polytype 15R is between 25% and 55%, as measured as a ratio of a height in a Cu-Kα X-ray diffraction pattern of 15R peak at a 2θ value of 34° and a height in the same diffraction pattern of a β-sialon peak at a 2θ value of 33°.
10. A cutting tool for machining a chip-forming metal, comprising: the ceramic material according to claim 9.
11. A cutting tool for machining a chip-forming metal, comprising: the ceramic material according to claim 8.
12. The ceramic material according to claim 8, wherein:
1.3≦z≦1.8.
13. The ceramic material according to claim 12, wherein:
1.6≦z≦1.7.
14. The ceramic material according to claim 8, wherein the ceramic material is devoid of Mg.
15. The ceramic material according to claim 8, comprising reaction products of Si.sub.3N.sub.4, AlN, Y.sub.2O.sub.3 and Al.sub.2O.sub.3, but not MgO.
16. A ceramic material consisting essentially of: β-sialon (Si.sub.(6-z)Al.sub.zO.sub.zN.sub.(8-z)), polytype 15R, and intergranular phase, and yttrium, wherein: z is the substitution rate in the β-sialon; and the polytype 15R comprises twin grains.
17. The ceramic material according to claim 16, wherein: an amount of the polytype 15R is between 25% and 55%, as measured as a ratio of a height in a Cu-Kα X-ray diffraction pattern of 15R peak at a 2θ value of 34° and a height in the same diffraction pattern of a β-sialon peak at a 2θ value of 33°.
18. The ceramic material according to claim 16, wherein:
1.3≦z≦1.8.
19. The ceramic material according to claim 18, wherein:
1.6≦z≦1.7.
20. The ceramic material according to claim 16, wherein the ceramic material is devoid of Mg.
21. The ceramic material according to claim 16, consisting essentially of reaction products of Si.sub.3N.sub.4, AlN, Y.sub.2O.sub.3 and Al.sub.2O.sub.3.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
[0016] The above and other objects, features and advantages of the present disclosure will become more apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art by describing in detail exemplary embodiments thereof with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
[0017]
[0018]
[0019]
[0020]
[0021]
[0022]
[0023]
[0024]
MODE FOR THE INVENTION
[0025] The raw materials used for the preparation of a ceramic material according to an exemplary embodiment and ratios thereof are shown in [Table 1] below. Y.sub.2O.sub.3 content and MgO content, which include metal ions for use as a catalyst in the preparation of the ceramic material, are fixed at 4 wt %.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Weight % No Si.sub.3N.sub.4 MgO AlN Y.sub.2O.sub.3 Al.sub.2O.sub.3 1 69.99 7.46 4.000 18.55 2 69.99 0.500 7.46 3.500 18.55 3 66.73 10.3 4.000 18.97 4 63.47 13.14 4.000 19.39 5 60.2 15.99 4.000 19.81 6 56.94 18.83 4.000 20.23 7 53.67 21.68 4.000 20.65 8 50.41 24.52 4.000 21.07 9 63.54 9.31 4.000 23.15 10 63.54 0.500 9.31 3.500 23.15 11 60.62 12.05 4.000 23.33 12 57.69 14.8 4.000 23.51 13 54.76 17.55 4.000 23.69 14 48.9 23.05 4.000 24.05 15 45.97 25.8 4.000 24.23
[0026] Powder mixture mixed at wt % according to [Table 1] is added with methanol as a solvent, a dispersant and a binder, and milled with a ball mill for about 20 hr. The raw materials are milled as described above so that a slurry of the raw materials is prepared.
[0027] After milling to prepare slurry, the slurry is granulated through a spray dryer. Powder is obtained by passing the granulated raw materials through a sieve.
[0028] The obtained powder is compressed into a compact. The compact is subject to debinding, and then sintered and densified during 2 hours of gas pressure sintering at 1680° C.˜1820° C.
[0029] [Table 2] below shows the ceramic material prepared from the Examples shown in [Table 1] by the procedures described above. Further, the prepared ceramic material was analyzed with the X-ray diffractography.
[0030]
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 z value of β-SiAlON (substitution rate) ratio of No Za Zc average 15R/beta (%) 1 1.45 1.46 1.46 0 2 1.48 1.50 1.49 0 3 1.48 1.47 1.48 4.71 4 1.47 1.47 1.47 9.18 5 1.43 1.44 1.43 19.48 6 1.39 1.38 1.38 30.69 7 1.39 1.37 1.38 39.22 8 1.39 1.36 1.37 51.17 9 1.84 1.85 1.85 0 10 1.89 1.90 1.90 0 11 1.76 1.79 1.78 5.64 12 1.77 1.77 1.77 12.2 13 1.71 1.74 1.73 21.47 14 1.68 1.69 1.68 48.8 15 1.63 1.65 1.64 71.22
[0031] Referring to
[0032] Further, based on the X-ray diffraction pattern as shown in
[0033] Additionally, the amount of the polytype 15R phase can be determined based on the ratio of the height in a Cu-Kα X-ray diffraction pattern of 15R peak at a 2θ value (b) of 34°, and the ratio of the height in a Cu-Kα X-ray diffraction pattern of the β-sialon peak at a 2θ value (a) of 33°.
[0034]
[0035] Additionally, referring to
[0036] Among the materials for a ceramic material, Example 2 and Example 10 that include MgO do not form polytype 15R phase. In other words, among Examples 1 to 15, the Examples that form the polytype 15R phase use Y.sub.2O.sub.3 as a catalyst.
[0037] Accordingly, the ceramic material according to an exemplary embodiment may consist of β-sialon, polytype 15R phase and intergranular phase between β-sialon and polytype 15R phase, and may contain yittrium (Y) which was included in the raw material. Further, in the ceramic material according to an exemplary embodiment, the polytype 15R phase may include twin grains.
[0038] <Evaluation 1>
[0039] Examples 1 to 16 were tested for Vickers hardness (H.sub.V), Rockwell hardness (H.sub.R) and fracture toughness (K.sub.IC), as shown in [Table 3] below. Referring to [Table 3], the unit of the Vickers hardness (H.sub.V) is kgf/mm.sup.2, and the unit of fracture toughness (K.sub.IC) is Pa.Math.m.sup.1/2.
TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 ratio of No H.sub.v H.sub.Ra K.sub.IC 15R/beta (%) 1 1535.4 93.8 3.5 0 2 1542.7 93.8 3.42 0 3 1536.8 93.8 3.53 4.71 4 1526.3 93.7 3.58 9.18 5 1515.6 93.7 3.54 19.48 6 1514.6 93.6 3.71 30.69 7 1514.1 93.5 3.69 39.22 8 1487.4 93.4 3.73 51.17 9 1489.5 93.8 3.2 0 10 1514.6 93.8 3.14 0 11 1502.1 93.6 3.29 5.64 12 1493.3 93.6 3.02 12.2 13 1494.6 93.6 3.24 21.47 14 1475.6 93.3 3.59 48.8 15 1469.1 93.2 3.39 71.22
[0040] Referring to [Table 3], the Vickers hardness (H.sub.V) was measured, by pressing with a square base diamond pyramid indenter consisting of a 136 degree included angle between opposite faces under 10 kg load, and measuring a diagonal line of the concave portion. At this time, the descending speed of the indenter was 150 μm/s, and 15 seconds of indentation time was maintained.
[0041] For the Rockwell hardness (H.sub.Ra) of [Table 3], a steel ball of a predetermined shape or a diamond cone-shaped indenter was used to exert an initial reference load, after which the load was increased to test load (60 kgf in the measuring of the present disclosure). The load was then returned to the initial reference load. The Rockwell hardness was then defined based on the difference of depths of the two indentations, i.e., the difference between the depth under reference loading and depth of the indentation.
[0042] The fracture toughness (K.sub.IC) in [Table 3] is measured using [Mathematical equation 1] suggested by Lawn B. R. and Fuller E. R. in “Equilibrium penny-like cracks in indentation fracture” (J. Mat. Sci. 12: 2016-2024(1975)).
[0043] where, P denotes indentation load (10 kg), and c is a length of crack.
[0044]
[0045] Referring to
[0046] However, referring to
[0047] Additionally, [Table 4] shows the brittleness index (B.sub.1) and wear resistance (R.sub.W) according to different ratios of polytype 15R.
TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 ratio of No 15R/beta (%) B.sub.I (×10.sup.3) Rw 1 0 4.30 0.66 2 0 4.42 0.65 3 4.71 4.27 0.66 4 9.18 4.18 0.67 5 19.48 4.20 0.67 6 30.69 4.00 0.69 7 39.22 4.02 0.69 8 51.17 3.91 0.70 9 0 4.56 0.63 10 0 4.73 0.61 11 5.64 4.47 0.64 12 12.2 4.85 0.60 13 21.47 4.52 0.63 14 48.8 4.03 0.69 15 71.22 4.25 0.66
[0048] Referring to [Table 4], the brittleness index (B.sub.1) is proportional to the Vickers hardness (H.sub.V), but is inversely proportional to the fracture toughness (K.sub.IC). [Mathematical equation 2] as below is used to obtain the brittleness index (B.sub.1) in [Table 4].
B.sub.1=H.sub.V/K.sub.IC [Mathematical equation 2]
[0049] The wear resistance (R.sub.W) in [Table 4] is an index to the frictional wear excluding chemical wear, which is inversely proportional to the Vickers hardness (H.sub.V), but is proportional to the fracture toughness (K.sub.IC). Also notable is higher sensitivity to the variation of fracture toughness (K.sub.IC), than to the Vickers hardness (H.sub.V). [Mathematical equation 3] as below is used to obtain the wear resistance (R.sub.W) in [Table 4].
R.sub.W=K.sub.IC.sup.3/4/H.sub.V.sup.0.5 [Mathematical equation 3]
[0050]
[0051] Referring to [Table 4], and
[0052] More specifically, it is understood that a ceramic material having between 25% and 55% of a ratio of polytype 15R phase may have lower brittleness index, but have higher wear resistance than the ceramic materials including polytype 15R phase of other ranges.
[0053] In the ceramic material according to an exemplary embodiment, the amount of the polytype 15R phase may be between 25% and 55%.
[0054] For example, referring to Example 14, one will be able to predict that a cutting tool insert would exhibit good wear resistance, as it is fabricated by processing the ceramic material with high ratio of polytype 15R phase.
[0055] <Evaluation 2>
[0056] Cutting tools, i.e., inserts were fabricated with the ceramic materials prepared according to Examples 10, 11 and 14 of [Table 1]. Each insert was subject to a test with Inconel 718 by a turning, at a speed of 740 m/min, moving speed of 0.1 mm/rev, and to a cutting depth of 1.5 mm and a cutting width of 20 mm. No cutting oil was used.
[0057] The frequency of cycles of withstanding by each insert was recorded, until the flank wear depth (Vb) became 0.45 mm.
[0058]
[0059]
[0060] When the life of the cutting tool fabricated with β-sialon without polytype 15R is 100, the life of a cutting tool fabricated with a ceramic material (Example 11) including 5.64% polytype 15R and β-sialon can be 104.
[0061] Further, when the life of the cutting tool fabricated with β-sialon without polytype 15R is 100, the life of a cutting tool fabricated with a ceramic material (Example 14) including 48.8% polytype 15R and β-sialon can be 266.
[0062] As indicated by the milling test result of
[0063] The milling test result of
[0064] Those with ordinary knowledge in the technical field of the present disclosure will be able to understand that the present disclosure can be embodied into different and more detailed modes, without departing from the technical concept or without modifying essential characteristics thereof. Accordingly, it will be understood that the exemplary embodiments described above are only illustrative, and should not be construed as limiting. While the scope of the present disclosure is represented by the claims accompanied below, the meaning and the scope of the claims, and all the modifications or modified forms that can be derived from the equivalent concepts will have to be interpreted as falling into the scope of the present disclosure.